| Literature DB >> 34318016 |
Robert L Geggel1,2, Kimberlee Gauvreau1,2, Ryan Callahan1,2, Eric N Feins3,4, Christopher W Baird3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A review of our center's experience before March 2011 showed that one half of 36 patients who had a baffling or reimplantation procedure to repair scimitar syndrome developed pulmonary vein obstruction. We analyzed the results of a new operation that enlarges the left atrium and avoids circuitous pathways or tension on the scimitar pulmonary vein.Entities:
Keywords: CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; IVC, inferior vena cava; congenital heart disease; partial anomalous pulmonary venous return; pulmonary vein stenosis; scimitar syndrome
Year: 2020 PMID: 34318016 PMCID: PMC8303092 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.07.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JTCVS Tech ISSN: 2666-2507
Figure 1Sites of obstruction associated with traditional baffle repair of scimitar syndrome. Diagram depicts traditional baffle repair of scimitar syndrome. The stars depict sites of potential obstruction associated with the long angulated course of the scimitar vein baffle pathway, including at the proximal segment of the scimitar vein baffle pathway, superior limbic band, and atrial septal defect.
Figure 2Triple patch operative technique to repair scimitar syndrome. A, Baseline anatomy showing scimitar vein connecting to the IVC superior to the level of the diaphragm and intact atrial septum. B, An incision is made in the right atrium and IVC to identify the origin of the scimitar vein. The atrial septum (1) and superior limbic band (2) are imaged. C, The atrial septum and superior limbic band have been resected. The left atrium is pulled downward and anastomosed to the right atrial tissue bringing the left atrium closer to the scimitar vein. D, A V-shaped incision is made in the atrium and scimitar vein and the space is filled in with a thin pulmonary homograft. E, An autologous pericardial patch is placed to divide the scimitar vein from the IVC and direct flow from the scimitar vein via a relatively straight baffle to the left atrium (red arrows) effectively closing the atrial septal defect. The vena cava flow courses anterior to this patch (blue arrows). F, A pericardial patch is placed in the IVC in the region where the baffle patch was placed to “raise the roof” and augment the caliber of this region.
Figure 3Preoperative cineangiograms. Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral views of levophase of right pulmonary artery angiogram in a 7-year-old patient who had the SV coursing a distance from the atrium and who subsequently had the triple multipatch procedure using pulmonary homograft insertion to connect the SV to the atrial tissue (A, B) and in a 10-year-old patient who had the SV in close proximity to the atrium and who subsequently had direct connection of the SV to the atrial tissue without use of pulmonary homograft material (C, D). SV, Scimitar vein.
Patient characteristics
| Variable | Multipatch procedure (n = 11) | Baffle or reimplantation (n = 11) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, y | 0.2 (1 d, 9.5) | 0.5 (1 d, 8.3) | .79 |
| Age at surgery, y | 3.7 (5 d, 15.7) | 3.7 (0.7, 10.6) | .49 |
| Imaging follow-up, y | 1.0 (29 d, 3.6) | 2.2 (0.6, 4.2) | .20 |
| Sex male | 7 (64%) | 6 (55%) | 1.0 |
| APC | 6 (55%) | 6 (55%) | 1.0 |
| Extracardiac anomalies | 6 (55%) | 4 (36%) | .67 |
| Cardiac anomalies excluding ASD | |||
| VSD and coarctation | 1 | ||
| RUPV-azygos vein | 1 | ||
| DORV | 1 | ||
| LUPV-innominate vein | 2 | ||
| LUPV-LSVC stenosis | 1 | ||
| LLPV stenosis | 1 | ||
| Holmes heart, DILV | 1 | ||
| LSVC-coronary sinus | 5 | ||
| Clinical presentation | |||
| Respiratory symptoms | 4 | 4 | |
| Murmur evaluation | 2 | 1 | |
| Dextrocardia on chest radiograph | 1 | 3 | |
| Follow-up fetal echocardiogram | 3 | 1 | |
| Incidental diagnosis | 2 | ||
| Unknown | 1 |
Values are given as median (range) or number. APC, Aortopulmonary collateral; ASD, atrial septal defect; VSD, ventricular septal defect; RUPV, right upper pulmonary vein; DORV, double-outlet right ventricle; LUPV, left upper pulmonary vein; LSVC, left superior vena cava; LLPV, left lower pulmonary vein; DILV, double inlet left ventricle.
Vertebral anomaly, imperforate anus, laryngeal cleft, cataract, renal dysplasia.
Tracheoesophageal fistula/esophageal atresia, imperforate anus, vertebral anomaly, thumb hypoplasia, hydrocephalus, tracheobronchomalacia.
Neonatal echocardiogram to follow-up on concerns raised from fetal study, including possible coarctation; coarctation and VSD; unable to identify right pulmonary veins; dextroposition.
Echocardiogram to evaluate previously diagnosed ASD; noted at catheterization in patient with double-inlet left ventricle.
Hemodynamic parameters at presentation and postoperative scimitar vein obstruction
| Variable | Multipatch procedure | Baffle or reimplantation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qp/Qs (n = 11, 10) | 2.0 (1.6-2.8) | 2.3 (1.6, 4.0) | .48 |
| Systolic PAP >1/2 systemic (n = 11, 11) | 1 | 3 | .59 |
| RVEDVi, mL/m2 (n = 6, 3) | 118 (103-204) | 126 (73-144) | .90 |
| Right lung perfusion, n (%) (n = 6, 10) | 42 (28-55) | 39 (21-52) | .74 |
| Postoperative SV obstruction (n = 11 , 11) | 0 | 5 (45%) | .017 |
Values are given as total number or median with range. Qp/Qs, Ratio of pulmonary/systemic flow; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; RVEDVi, right ventricular end-diastolic volume index; SV, scimitar vein.
Figure 4Postoperative cardiac computed tomography scan. Postoperative computed tomography scan of 7-year-old child who had the triple multipatch procedure as part of surgical repair. Unobstructed left upper (LU) and left lower (LL) pulmonary veins connecting to the left atrium are shown in (A) and unobstructed scimitar vein (SV) is shown in (B) This patient also had the right upper (RU) pulmonary vein connecting to the azygos vein and had this vein baffled separately to the left atrium. Ao, Aorta.
Figure 5Freedom from scimitar vein obstruction after surgical repair. Kaplan–Meier curve depicting freedom from development of scimitar vein obstruction after standard repair (baffling or reimplantation) and the new procedure using double or triple patches as described in the text. The variable length of follow-up is depicted by the number of patients at risk over the study period. The shaded area depicts the confidence band for the baffle or reimplantation group. Confidence bands could not be constructed for the new procedure group, since no patients developed obstruction.