Commentary: Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MD

Management of neonatal Ebstein's anomaly remains elusive and varies based on presentation, morphology, and experience. A staged Starnes procedure followed by cone repair is a valid strategy in selected patients.

See Article page 281.

In this issue of the Journal, Da Silva and colleagues describe 2 children with Ebstein's anomaly who had initially undergone a neonatal Starnes procedure (right ventricular exclusion with fenestrated tricuspid valve patch and modified Blalock–Taussig shunt) and subsequently underwent takedown of the patch and cone repair of the tricuspid valve plus right ventricular outflow tract obstruction relief, thus converting them to biventricular repair (1 patient at age 5 months) and one-and-a-half ventricular repair (1 patient at age 17 months after an intermediary Glenn shunt). The authors concluded that this sequence of initial single ventricle palliation and subsequent tricuspid valve repair is a viable strategy for treating neonates with Ebstein's anomaly and severe heart failure.

Ebstein's anomaly is a heterogeneous complex congenital heart disease that involves the tricuspid valve and the right ventricle, with the presentation varying based on the severity of the disease. Dr José Pedro Da Silva is credited for introducing the cone repair, with reports of excellent early and late outcomes. Subsequently, many surgeons adopted cone repair as the procedure of choice for Ebstein's anomaly. Nonetheless, the majority of patients who underwent cone repair in the early experience of Da Silva and others were older children and young adults, whereas cone repair in very small children has been rarely described.,

The current contribution from Da Silva and colleagues demonstrates the following: (1) cone repair is effective in neonates and small infants with Ebstein's anomaly, analogous to some reports from Asia,; and (2) cone repair can be performed following the Starnes procedure. Although tricuspid valve repair has been previously described following the Starnes procedure, this current report might be the first describing cone repair in that setting. This is valuable information, given the evidence that right ventricular exclusion leads to ventricular regression. The window for performing biventricular repair after right ventricular exclusion remains unclear.

The issue of whether or not to proceed with a primary neonatal cone repair versus initial single ventricle Starnes procedure followed by cone repair is also unresolved. Although neonatal cone repair might be technically feasible, Ebstein's anomaly involves the right ventricle as well, and the dysfunctional right ventricle might not be able to generate sufficient pressure to open the pulmonary valve in neonates with severe Ebstein's anomaly, favoring initial single ventricle palliation. The criteria for selecting candidates for primary neonatal repair or for eventual biventricular repair remain to be determined and are likely linked to clinical presentation, heart morphology, and institutional experience and philosophy towards this complex disease. This report of a staged approach offers a valid strategy in neonates with significant heart failure as a result of severe Ebstein's anomaly.

Although adding another treatment strategy for a difficult problem to the surgeon's armamentarium is a cause for celebration, unfortunately, the reality is less appealing. First, there are substantial variances in the management strategies of neonates with severe Ebstein's anomaly: some centers (eg, Toronto, Melbourne) have reported successful conservative medical management in the majority of patients., When intervention is necessary, some centers are more likely to implement a single ventricle palliation strategy (eg, Los Angeles, Michigan), whereas a few applied primary biventricular repair in the majority of patients (eg, Memphis, Osaka, Taipei).4, 5, 6,, These variations again highlight the differences in experience and approach to this complex disease and the knowledge gap that exists, prohibiting a consensus uniform tactic for managing these complicated neonates. Second, operative mortality following the diverse treatment strategies of neonatal Ebstein's anomaly continues to be higher than desired. One of the many contributions of Dr Vaughn Starnes to our field include the single ventricle right ventricular exclusion principle that provided improved survival in these patients; however, mortality continues to be among the highest in our specialty: 5 of 27 (19%) in the experience from Los Angeles (only 13% with patch fenestration). Similarly, reported mortality following neonatal tricuspid valve repair for Ebstein's anomaly is high, up to 75%; in the experience of Dr Knott-Craig from Memphis, mortality was 28%, although it was lower in those without pulmonary atresia and those with pulmonary atresia who underwent a right ventricle–to–pulmonary artery conduit. In a recent review of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, tricuspid valve repair was the most common neonatal intervention (40%; mortality, 34%), followed by aortopulmonary shunt (20%; mortality, 17%) and the Starnes procedure (9%; mortality, 25%); again highlighting variations in strategies and continuous high mortality.

In summary, neonatal management of Ebstein's anomaly remains elusive, and proper candidates for conservative medical management and single or biventricular repair are not well identified. Management varies based on morphology, clinical presentation, and institutional experience; however, overall early mortality remains high for all treatment strategies. A staged approach that includes an initial single ventricle Starnes procedure followed by conversion to biventricular repair is feasible and might be considered in selected neonates with intractable heart failure that is not responsive to conservative management.