Literature DB >> 3431694

Size determination of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations by MR, CT and angio.

B Noorbehesht1, J I Fabrikant, D R Enzmann.   

Abstract

Twenty patients with high-flow supratentorial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were studied by magnetic resonance imaging (MR), computed tomography (CT), and selective cerebral angiography. The size of the malformation measured on MR was found, in general, to be smaller than the size determined from angiographic films. This discrepancy increased as the size of the AVM increased. AVM size on CT and angiography was found to be essentially equivalent. The reason for these differences between MR and CT or angiography was the ability to separate out the draining veins by MR, whereas this was difficult on projection films and contrast enhanced CT. Calcification was more easily detected by CT than by MR. MR better detected hemorrhage, which could be mistaken for old infarction on CT. Foci of cystic change within the nidus of the AVM were equally evident on MR and CT. Due to its sensitivity in discriminating between AVM nidus and adjacent draining veins and MR's ability to show the AVM in three planes, MR appeared to be more accurate in defining the AVM nidus than either CT or cerebral angiography. Such accurate delineation is crucial in patients prior to stereotactic radiosurgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3431694     DOI: 10.1007/BF00350432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of intracranial vascular malformations.

Authors:  H Sang; C B Wilson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1975-09

2.  Treatment of arteriovenous malformations of the cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  J L POOL
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  NMR imaging in the diagnosis and management of intracranial angiomas.

Authors:  I R Young; G M Bydder; A S Hall; R E Steiner; B S Worthington; R C Hawkes; G N Holland; W S Moore
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  NMR demonstration of cerebral abnormalities: comparison with CT.

Authors:  M Brant-Zawadzki; P L Davis; L E Crooks; C M Mills; D Norman; T H Newton; P Sheldon; L Kaufman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Stereotactic heavy-ion Bragg peak radiosurgery for intra-cranial vascular disorders: method for treatment of deep arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  J I Fabrikant; J T Lyman; Y Hosobuchi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of CT and MR in 400 patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  W G Bradley; V Waluch; R A Yadley; R R Wycoff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Intracranial vascular malformations: MR and CT imaging.

Authors:  W Kucharczyk; L Lemme-Pleghos; A Uske; M Brant-Zawadzki; G Dooms; D Norman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases.

Authors:  G M Bydder; R E Steiner; I R Young; A S Hall; D J Thomas; J Marshall; C A Pallis; N J Legg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  MR imaging of cerebral vascular malformations.

Authors:  B C Lee; L Herzberg; R D Zimmerman; M D Deck
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Heavy charged-particle Bragg peak radiosurgery for intracranial vascular disorders.

Authors:  J I Fabrikant; J T Lyman; K A Frankel
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1985
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Value of contrast enhanced CT scanning in the non-trauma emergency room patient.

Authors:  L P Wood; M Parisi; I J Finch
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  F Nüssel; H Wegmüller; P Huber
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ozkan Ozsarlak; Johan W Van Goethem; Menno Maes; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-12-04       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Usefulness of three-dimensional phase contrast MR angiography on arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  B Pant; M Sumida; K Arita; A Tominaga; F Ikawa; K Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Arteriovenous malformation of brain with stroke in Down syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Rajniti Prasad; Utpal Kant Singh; Om Prakash Mishra
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-02-20

6.  Intracranial magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  P M Ruggieri; T J Masaryk; J S Ross; M T Modic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Neurovascular lesions and endovascular therapy: the role of MR.

Authors:  B A Jabour; J E Dion; R Lufkin; F Viñuela; T Lin; B Moffit; G R Duckwiler; J Bentson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Intracranial Gorgon: Surgical Case Report of a Large Calcified Brain Arteriovenous Malformation.

Authors:  Ioan Alexandru Florian; Laura Popovici; Teodora Larisa Timis; Ioan Stefan Florian; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.