| Literature DB >> 34316285 |
Akrivi Krouska1, Christos Troussas1, Cleo Sgouropoulou1.
Abstract
The closure of educational institutions due to the COVID-19 pandemic leads imperatively to the utilization of technological advances and the Internet for enabling the continuity of learning. To this direction, Mobile Game-based Learning (MGbL) can be beneficial to teaching and learning; since, from technological perspective, most students prefer to use their mobile devices, such as smartphones or tablets, and from pedagogical perspective, incorporating gaming in educational process can boost students' motivation for learning and improve their learning outcomes. Hence, this study investigates learners' intention to use MGbL as an alternative educational practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, by modeling the pedagogical affordance of this technology and student interactions with it. As a testbed for this research, a MGbL application was used for the instruction of the programming language C# in higher education, during the lockdown period of 2020. The findings reveal that the MGbL technology has a significant and positive impact on student engagement and academic performance.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Collaborative learning; Educational use; Mobile game-based learning; Personalized learning; Structural equation modeling
Year: 2021 PMID: 34316285 PMCID: PMC8299167 DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10672-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) ISSN: 1360-2357
Fig. 1Research model
Demographic information of participants
| Characteristics | Number/Level | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Female | 19.2 years in average |
| Male | 19.5 years in average | |
| Gender | Female | 46 |
| Male | 54 | |
| Area of origin | Urban origins | 64 |
| Non-urban origins | 36 | |
| Year of study | 2nd year of studies | 100 |
| Computer skills | Advanced | |
| Grade in studies (Average of first-year courses) | 8.5 – 10 | 16 |
| 6.5 – 8.4 | 59 | |
| 5 – 6.4 | 25 | |
Results of measurement model
| Variable | Indicator | Outer Loading | AVE | CR | Cronbach’s Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEoU | PEoU1 | .909 | .748 | .898 | .841 |
| PEoU2 | .927 | ||||
| PEoU3 | .748 | ||||
| PE | PE1 | .940 | .595 | .810 | .821 |
| PE2 | .758 | ||||
| PE3 | .793 | ||||
| PL | PL1 | .927 | .739 | .894 | .839 |
| PL2 | .765 | ||||
| PL3 | .879 | ||||
| MGbL | MGbL1 | .962 | .691 | .857 | .780 |
| MGbL2 | .916 | ||||
| MGbL3 | .970 | ||||
| CL | CL1 | .838 | .654 | .845 | .740 |
| CL2 | .759 | ||||
| CL3 | .812 | ||||
| SE | SE1 | .701 | .642 | .842 | .750 |
| SE2 | .788 | ||||
| SE3 | .903 | ||||
| SP | SP1 | .859 | .638 | .840 | .722 |
| SP2 | .722 | ||||
| SP3 | .808 |
Fornell-Larcker discriminant validity criterion
| PEoU | PE | PL | MGbL | CL | SE | SP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEoU | |||||||
| PE | .541 | ||||||
| PL | .327 | .194 | |||||
| MGbL | .406 | .612 | .268 | ||||
| CL | .365 | .398 | .239 | .325 | |||
| SE | .193 | .378 | .541 | .456 | .157 | ||
| SP | .160 | .232 | .496 | .756 | .192 | .449 |
The values on the diagonal (square root of AVE) are greater than their own row and column values (inter-construct correlations)
Results of hypothesis testing
| Hypothesis | Path | β | Std. Dev. | t-stat. | p value | Supported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | PEoU ➔ MGbL | .287 | .155 | 2.563 | .032 | Yes |
| H2 | PE ➔ MGbL | .325 | .156 | 2.485 | .038 | Yes |
| H3 | PL ➔ MGbL | .223 | .166 | 2.884 | .026 | Yes |
| H4 | PL ➔ SP | .425 | .152 | 3.005 | .020 | Yes |
| H5 | MGbL ➔ CL | .195 | .164 | 2.691 | .028 | Yes |
| H6 | MGbL ➔ SE | .564 | .132 | 3.604 | .003 | Yes |
| H7 | MGbL ➔ SP | .606 | .112 | 6.467 | .000 | Yes |
| H8 | CL ➔ SP | .106 | .162 | 2.328 | .042 | Yes |
| H9 | SE ➔ SP | .136 | .165 | 2.089 | .046 | Yes |
Fig. 2Structural Model