Literature DB >> 34315486

Prevalence and determinants of low social support during pregnancy among Australian women: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Asres Bedaso1,2, Jon Adams3, Wenbo Peng3, David Sibbritt3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a time for women in which the need for social support is crucial. Social support reduces stressors and improves the emotional and physical well-being of pregnant women. Women receiving low social support during pregnancy are at risk of substances use, developing mental illness, and adverse birth outcomes. The current study aims to determine the prevalence and determinants of low social support during pregnancy among Australian women.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the 1973-1978 cohort of Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) and those who report being pregnant (n = 493) were included in the current analyses. Social support was assessed using Medical Outcomes Study Social Support index (MOSS). A logistic regression model was applied to identify determinants of low social support, separately for each MOSS domain. RESULT: The study found that 7.1% (n = 35) of pregnant women reported low social support. Significant determinants of low emotional support were non-partnered (AOR = 4.4, 95% CI: 1.27, 14.99), difficulty managing on available income (AOR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.18, 8.32), experiencing depressive symptoms (AOR = 8.5, 95% CI: 3.29, 22.27) and anxiety symptoms (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.26, 7.03). Significant determinants of low affectionate support were suffering from depressive symptoms (AOR = 5.3, 95% CI: 1.59, 17.99), having anxiety symptoms (AOR: 6.9, 95% CI: 2.21, 22.11) and being moderately/very stressed (AOR: 3, 95% CI: 1.17, 7.89). Significant determinants of low tangible support were difficulty managing available income (AOR = 3, 95% CI: 1.29, 6.95), and being depressed (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.48, 5.34).
CONCLUSION: The study revealed that 7.1% of pregnant women reported low social support. Having a mental health problems, being stressed, being from low socio-economic status and being non-partnered were significant determinants of low social support during pregnancy. Maternal health professionals and policymakers can use this information to screen pregnant women at risk of receiving low social support and improve the level of support being provided.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affectionate support; Emotional support; Low social support; Mental health; Pregnancy; Tangible support; Women

Year:  2021        PMID: 34315486     DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01210-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  43 in total

1.  [Some emotional repercussions of adolescent pregnancy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1999-2001)].

Authors:  Adriane Reis Sabroza; Maria do Carmo Leal; Paulo Roberto de Souza; Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 1.632

2.  Depression during pregnancy among young couples: the effect of personal and partner experiences of stressors and the buffering effects of social relationships.

Authors:  Anna A Divney; Heather Sipsma; Derrick Gordon; Linda Niccolai; Urania Magriples; Trace Kershaw
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 3.  Clarifying the social support theory-research linkage.

Authors:  J E Hupcey
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Unintended pregnancy and the psychosocial well-being of pregnant women.

Authors:  S T Orr; C A Miller
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

5.  Maternal psychological distress, prenatal cortisol, and fetal weight.

Authors:  Miguel A Diego; Nancy A Jones; Tiffany Field; Maria Hernandez-Reif; Saul Schanberg; Cynthia Kuhn; Adolfo Gonzalez-Garcia
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 6.  Untreated prenatal maternal depression and the potential risks to offspring: a review.

Authors:  Deana B Davalos; Carly A Yadon; Hope C Tregellas
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Psychological science on pregnancy: stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues.

Authors:  Christine Dunkel Schetter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Psychosocial correlates of prepartum and postpartum depressed mood.

Authors:  D Da Costa; J Larouche; M Dritsa; W Brender
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Perinatal depression and birth outcomes in a Healthy Start project.

Authors:  Megan V Smith; Lin Shao; Heather Howell; Haiqun Lin; Kimberly A Yonkers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-04

10.  Stressful life events, social health issues and low birthweight in an Australian population-based birth cohort: challenges and opportunities in antenatal care.

Authors:  Stephanie J Brown; Jane S Yelland; Georgina A Sutherland; Peter A Baghurst; Jeffrey S Robinson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.