| Literature DB >> 34315123 |
Chaeyoung Rhee1, Sung-Gwan Park2, Dae Wook Kim1, Sung Il Yu1, Juhee Shin1, Seokhwan Hwang3, Seung Gu Shin4.
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion encounters operational instability due to fluctuations in organic loading. Propionic acid (HPr) is frequently accumulated due to its unfavorable reaction thermodynamics. Here, 'specific' bioaugmentation using HPr enrichment cultures (three different injection regimes of quantity and frequency) was compared with 'non-specific' bioaugmentation using anaerobic sludge, and with non-biological supplementation of magnetite or coenzyme M. The specific bioaugmentation treatments showed superior recovery responses during continuous feeding after a peak overload. A 'one-shot' bioaugmentation with enrichment showed the best remediation, with ~25% recovery time and >10% CH4 conversion efficiency compared to the control. Consecutive bioaugmentation showed evidence of increased stability of the introduced community. Families Synergistaceae, Syntrophobacteraceae, and Kosmotogaceae were likely responsible for HPr-oxidation, in potential syntrophy with Methanoculleus and Methanobacterium. The different supplementation strategies can be considered to reduce the effect of start-up or overload in anaerobic digesters based on the availability of supplementation resources.Entities:
Keywords: Bioaugmentation; Coenzyme M; Magnetite; Next-generation sequencing; Propionate
Year: 2021 PMID: 34315123 DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioresour Technol ISSN: 0960-8524 Impact factor: 9.642