Literature DB >> 34315032

The effect of interpolating low amplitude leads on the inverse reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity.

Ali S Rababah1, Laura R Bear2, Yesim Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz3, Wilson Good4, Jake Bergquist4, Job Stoks5, Rob MacLeod4, Khaled Rjoob6, Michael Jennings6, James Mclaughlin6, Dewar D Finlay6.   

Abstract

Electrocardiographic imaging is an imaging modality that has been introduced recently to help in visualizing the electrical activity of the heart and consequently guide the ablation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias. One of the main challenges of this modality is that the electrocardiographic signals recorded at the torso surface are contaminated with noise from different sources. Low amplitude leads are more affected by noise due to their low peak-to-peak amplitude. In this paper, we have studied 6 datasets from two torso tank experiments (Bordeaux and Utah experiments) to investigate the impact of removing or interpolating these low amplitude leads on the inverse reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity. Body surface potential maps used were calculated by using the full set of recorded leads, removing 1, 6, 11, 16, or 21 low amplitude leads, or interpolating 1, 6, 11, 16, or 21 low amplitude leads using one of the three interpolation methods - Laplacian interpolation, hybrid interpolation, or the inverse-forward interpolation. The epicardial potential maps and activation time maps were computed from these body surface potential maps and compared with those recorded directly from the heart surface in the torso tank experiments. There was no significant change in the potential maps and activation time maps after the removal of up to 11 low amplitude leads. Laplacian interpolation and hybrid interpolation improved the inverse reconstruction in some datasets and worsened it in the rest. The inverse forward interpolation of low amplitude leads improved it in two out of 6 datasets and at least remained the same in the other datasets. It was noticed that after doing the inverse-forward interpolation, the selected lambda value was closer to the optimum lambda value that gives the inverse solution best correlated with the recorded one.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activation times maps; Hybrid interpolation; Inverse reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity; Inverse-forward interpolation; Laplacian interpolation; Low amplitude leads; Potential maps

Year:  2021        PMID: 34315032      PMCID: PMC8461453          DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   6.698


  19 in total

Review 1.  On selecting a body surface mapping procedure.

Authors:  R Hoekema; G J Uijen; A van Oosterom
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Methods of solving reduced lead systems for inverse electrocardiography.

Authors:  Alireza Ghodrati; Dana H Brooks; Robert S MacLeod
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Recent progress in inverse problems in electrocardiology.

Authors:  R S MacLeod; D H Brooks
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

4.  Effects of ECG Signal Processing on the Inverse Problem of Electrocardiography.

Authors:  Laura R Bear; Y Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz; J Svehlikova; J Coll-Font; W Good; E van Dam; R Macleod; E Abell; R Walton; R Coronel; Michel Haissaguerre; R Dubois
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2018-09

5.  Selection of the number and positions of measuring locations for electrocardiography.

Authors:  R C Barr; M S Spach; G S Herman-Giddens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Novel hybrid method for interpolating missing information in body surface potential maps.

Authors:  Ali S Rababah Msc; Raymond R Bond; Khaled Rjoob Msc; Daniel Guldenring; James McLaughlin; Dewar D Finlay
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  Relating epicardial to body surface potential distributions by means of transfer coefficients based on geometry measurements.

Authors:  R C Barr; M Ramsey; M S Spach
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Effects of Interpolation on the Inverse Problem of Electrocardiography.

Authors:  Y S Dogrusoz; L R Bear; J Bergquist; R Dubois; W Good; R S MacLeod; A Rababah; J Stoks
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2020-02-24

9.  Novel experimental model for studying the spatiotemporal electrical signature of acute myocardial ischemia: a translational platform.

Authors:  Brian Zenger; Wilson W Good; Jake A Bergquist; Brett M Burton; Jess D Tate; Leo Berkenbile; Vikas Sharma; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.833

10.  PFEIFER: Preprocessing Framework for Electrograms Intermittently Fiducialized from Experimental Recordings.

Authors:  Anton Rodenhauser; Wilson W Good; Brian Zenger; Jess Tate; Kedar Aras; Brett Burton; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  J Open Source Softw       Date:  2018
View more
  1 in total

1.  Body Surface Potential Mapping: Contemporary Applications and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Jake Bergquist; Lindsay Rupp; Brian Zenger; James Brundage; Anna Busatto; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Hearts (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.