Literature DB >> 34314668

Emergence of SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein Escape Mutation Q493R after Treatment for COVID-19.

Daniele Focosi, Federica Novazzi, Angelo Genoni, Francesco Dentali, Daniela Dalla Gasperina, Andreina Baj, Fabrizio Maggi.   

Abstract

We report in vivo selection of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike mutation (Q493R) conferring simultaneous resistance to bamlanivimab and etesivimab. This mutation was isolated from a patient who had coronavirus disease and was treated with these drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Italy; SARS-CoV-2; bamlaniv/etesevimab; coronavirus disease; coronaviruses; receptor-binding motif; respiratory infections; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; spike protein; spike protein escape mutation Q493R; treatment; variant; viruses; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34314668      PMCID: PMC8462334          DOI: 10.3201/eid2710.211538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) usually result from random mutations in humans or other hosts, but accelerated evolution can also occur under selective pressure from therapeutic interventions using neutralizing antibodies (). Bamlanivimab has been recently withdrawn as a monotherapy because of treatment failure against E484K SARS-CoV-2 virus variants. Emergency use remains authorized for the bamlanivimab/etesevimab cocktail, targeting overlapping epitopes (), for which no completely resistant variant has been reported to date. This cocktail has been effective in reducing hospitalizations when administered early after infection (). Given increasing reports of accelerated intrahost evolution of drug-resistant SARS-CoV-2 clades after neutralizing antibody‒based treatments (,), we began screening patients who failed to show virus-negative results for nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens after they were given bamlanivimab/etesevimab. We report an in vivo case of a spike protein escape mutation conferring combined resistance to bamlanivimab and etesevimab. A 73-year-old man had cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed during February 2021. While he was waiting for chemotherapy, sepsis developed, and he was admitted to Varese Hospital (Varese, Italy) on April 12 and given a steroid and antimicrobial drugs. At admission, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) for SARS CoV-2 in an NPS specimen showed a negative result, but the same test showed a positive result on April 24. Given that he had recovered from sepsis, the patient was moved to the coronavirus disease unit of the hospital on April 25. He satisfied 1 of the frail-patient categories for emergency use of spike protein monoclonal antibodies approved by the Italian Drug Agency. The patient was also seronegative for S1/S2 IgG against spike protein (Diasorin, https://www.diasorin.com). On April 26, the patient received a single intravenous infusion of bamlanivimab (700 mg) and etesevimab (400 mg) at the hospital. RT-PCR performed on an NPS specimen collected before the infusion was positive for SARS-CoV-2 and showed a cycle threshold (Ct) of 12 (Alinity Analyzer; Abbott Laboratories, https://www abbott.com). Follow-up analysis of NPS specimens showed positive results on Apr 28 (Ct 15) and May 3 (Ct 24). Chest computed tomography on April 30 showed progression to interstitial pneumonia, and the patient was given noninvasive ventilation. No additional bamlanivimab/etesevimab infusion was performed, and the patient died on May 14. According to national guidelines for breakthrough infections, we sequenced SARS-CoV-2‒positive samples. We performed a SARS CoV-2 RT-PCR on NPS specimens by using the Alinity Platform (Abbott Laboratories), and measured S1/S2 IgG by using a chemiluminescent immunoassay (Diasorin). We used the Sanger method to sequence the spike gene as reported (), analyzed sequences by using NextStrain (https://nextstrain.org), and deposited sequences in GenBank. Spike gene sequencing of the NPS specimen obtained on April 24 clade B.1.1.7 (Alpha; NextStrain clade 20I/501Y.V1; GenBank accession no. MZ157261), which was 94% prevalent in Italy at that time. However, the May 3 specimen showed a secondary A1478G peak in the spike protein gene, corresponding to the spike Q493R mutation, which became predominant by May 8 (Ct 18; GenBank accession no. MZ157275) (Figure).
Figure

Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants in a patient who had coronavirus disease who was given bamlanivimab and etesivimab, Italy. Ct, cycle threshold; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants in a patient who had coronavirus disease who was given bamlanivimab and etesivimab, Italy. Ct, cycle threshold; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. E484, F490, Q493, and S494 are the 4 aa residues within the spike protein receptor-binding motif that are known to be critical for bamlanivimab binding. Q493 is also among the many more receptor-binding motif residues crucial for interactions with etesivimab. Q493R/K (which can be selected in vitro by bamlanivimab [,]) is to date the only mutation that causes resistance to bamlanivimab and etesivimab. This residue also causes resistance to other class 3 monoclonal antibodies () (i.e., those that do not overlap with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 binding site and have accessibility to the receptor-binding domain epitope in the up and down conformations). In pseudoviral neutralization assays, Q493R reduces susceptibility to bamlanivimab by >6,666-fold, to etesevimab by 232-fold, and to the combination of both drugs by >100-fold (). In a flow cytometry competitive assay, Q493R reduces the 50% inhibitory concentration >100-fold for bamlanivimab and 42-fold for etesivimab (). Q493R has a frequency of 0.006% in the GISAID database (https://www.gisaid.org; 85 of 1,424,998 deposited sequences as of May 8, 2021; https://covid19dashboard.regeneron.com/?tab=Mutation_Details&subTab=Spike), making the occurrence of co-infection with a Q493R-positive strain extremely unlikely in our patient. It remains unclear how such risk extends to different spike protein monoclonal antibody cocktails targeting nonoverlapping epitopes. Although different mutations can similarly cause immune escape by the nonoverlapping REGN-CoV-2 (imdevimab plus casirivimab) cocktail, hamster models and clinical trials showed no increased emergence of variants (R. Copin et al., Regeneron Pharamaceuticals Inc., pers. comm., 2021 Jun 22). Nevertheless, Choi et al. reported a patient having detectable SARS-CoV-2 for 154 days, and accelerated viral evolution in the spike protein after being given remdesivir and REGN-CoV-2 (). The nonoverlapping AZD7442 (COV2–2130 and COV2–2196) cocktail also seems resistant to rapid escape (J. Dong et al., Huazhong University of Science and Technology, pers. comm., 2021 Jun 21), but again, such in vitro or animal models could miss rare in vivo events. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 mutations conferring resistance to bamlanivimab and etesevimab can arise in vivo after specific selective pressure; Q493 mutations increase binding affinity to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Additional studies are needed to clarify whether such escape mutations can spread and persist in humans. Genomic surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 variants is encouraged for coronavirus disease patients who do not respond well to treatment with spike protein monoclonal antibodies.
  6 in total

1.  Intractable Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Prolonged Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Replication in a Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T-Cell Therapy Recipient: A Case Study.

Authors:  Matthew K Hensley; William G Bain; Jana Jacobs; Sham Nambulli; Urvi Parikh; Anthony Cillo; Brittany Staines; Amy Heaps; Michele D Sobolewski; Linda J Rennick; Bernard J C Macatangay; Cynthia Klamar-Blain; Georgios D Kitsios; Barbara Methé; Ashwin Somasundaram; Tullia C Bruno; Carly Cardello; Feng Shan; Creg Workman; Prabir Ray; Anuradha Ray; Janet Lee; Rahil Sethi; William E Schwarzmann; Mark S Ladinsky; Pamela J Bjorkman; Dario A Vignali; W Paul Duprex; Mounzer E Agha; John W Mellors; Kevin D McCormick; Alison Morris; Ghady Haidar
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Imported SARS-CoV-2 Variant P.1 in Traveler Returning from Brazil to Italy.

Authors:  Fabrizio Maggi; Federica Novazzi; Angelo Genoni; Andreina Baj; Pietro Giorgio Spezia; Daniele Focosi; Cristian Zago; Alberto Colombo; Gianluca Cassani; Renee Pasciuta; Antonio Tamborini; Agostino Rossi; Martina Prestia; Riccardo Capuano; Lorenzo Azzi; Annalisa Donadini; Giuseppe Catanoso; Paolo Antonio Grossi; Lorenzo Maffioli; Gianni Bonelli
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Complete map of SARS-CoV-2 RBD mutations that escape the monoclonal antibody LY-CoV555 and its cocktail with LY-CoV016.

Authors:  Tyler N Starr; Allison J Greaney; Adam S Dingens; Jesse D Bloom
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-04-05

4.  A cocktail of antibodies for COVID-19 therapy.

Authors:  Dean B Matthews
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  Persistence and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in an Immunocompromised Host.

Authors:  Bina Choi; Manish C Choudhary; James Regan; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert F Padera; Xueting Qiu; Isaac H Solomon; Hsiao-Hsuan Kuo; Julie Boucau; Kathryn Bowman; U Das Adhikari; Marisa L Winkler; Alisa A Mueller; Tiffany Y-T Hsu; Michaël Desjardins; Lindsey R Baden; Brian T Chan; Bruce D Walker; Mathias Lichterfeld; Manfred Brigl; Douglas S Kwon; Sanjat Kanjilal; Eugene T Richardson; A Helena Jonsson; Galit Alter; Amy K Barczak; William P Hanage; Xu G Yu; Gaurav D Gaiha; Michael S Seaman; Manuela Cernadas; Jonathan Z Li
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Emergence of the E484K mutation in SARS-COV-2-infected immunocompromised patients treated with bamlanivimab in Germany.

Authors:  Bjoern Jensen; Nadine Luebke; Torsten Feldt; Verena Keitel; Timo Brandenburger; Detlef Kindgen-Milles; Matthias Lutterbeck; Noemi F Freise; David Schoeler; Rainer Haas; Alexander Dilthey; Ortwin Adams; Andreas Walker; Joerg Timm; Tom Luedde
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-07-14
  6 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Severino Jefferson Ribeiro da Silva; Jessica Catarine Frutuoso do Nascimento; Renata Pessôa Germano Mendes; Klarissa Miranda Guarines; Caroline Targino Alves da Silva; Poliana Gomes da Silva; Jurandy Júnior Ferraz de Magalhães; Justin R J Vigar; Abelardo Silva-Júnior; Alain Kohl; Keith Pardee; Lindomar Pena
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Broader-species receptor binding and structural bases of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 to both mouse and palm-civet ACE2s.

Authors:  Linjie Li; Pu Han; Baihan Huang; Yufeng Xie; Weiwei Li; Di Zhang; Pengcheng Han; Zepeng Xu; Bin Bai; Jingya Zhou; Xinrui Kang; Xiaomei Li; Anqi Zheng; Rong Zhang; Shitong Qiao; Xin Zhao; Jianxun Qi; Qihui Wang; Kefang Liu; George Fu Gao
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 38.079

Review 3.  Identifying Markers of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Patients With Secondary Immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Nathan M Markarian; Gaël Galli; Dhanesh Patel; Mark Hemmings; Priya Nagpal; Albert M Berghuis; Levon Abrahamyan; Silvia M Vidal
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Accelerated SARS-CoV-2 intrahost evolution leading to distinct genotypes during chronic infection.

Authors:  Chrispin Chaguza; Anne M Hahn; Mary E Petrone; Shuntai Zhou; David Ferguson; Mallery I Breban; Kien Pham; Mario A Peña-Hernández; Christopher Castaldi; Verity Hill; Wade Schulz; Ronald I Swanstrom; Scott C Roberts; Nathan D Grubaugh
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-07-02

5.  Dynamics of the interaction between the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant and human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2.

Authors:  Priya Antony; Amie Jobe; Ranjit Vijayan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.061

6.  Update on SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant of Concern and Its Peculiar Mutational Profile.

Authors:  Valentina Svicher; Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein; Mohammad Alkhatib; Romina Salpini; Luca Carioti; Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio; Stefano D'Anna; Leonardo Duca; Giosuè Costa; Maria Concetta Bellocchi; Lorenzo Piermatteo; Anna Artese; Maria Mercedes Santoro; Stefano Alcaro
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 7.  Emerging evidence on Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant.

Authors:  Vineet Sharma; Himanshu Rai; Dev N S Gautam; Pradeep K Prajapati; Rohit Sharma
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 20.693

8.  Emergence of Q493R mutation in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein during bamlanivimab/etesevimab treatment and resistance to viral clearance.

Authors:  Aurélie Guigon; Emmanuel Faure; Chloé Lemaire; Marie-Charlotte Chopin; Claire Tinez; Ady Assaf; Mouna Lazrek; Didier Hober; Laurence Bocket; Ilka Engelmann; Enagnon Kazali Alidjinou
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.072

9.  Structural and functional characterizations of infectivity and immune evasion of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron.

Authors:  Zhen Cui; Pan Liu; Nan Wang; Lei Wang; Kaiyue Fan; Qianhui Zhu; Kang Wang; Ruihong Chen; Rui Feng; Zijing Jia; Minnan Yang; Ge Xu; Boling Zhu; Wangjun Fu; Tianming Chu; Leilei Feng; Yide Wang; Xinran Pei; Peng Yang; Xiaoliang Sunney Xie; Lei Cao; Yunlong Cao; Xiangxi Wang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Evolution of spike mutations following antibody treatment in two immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Yotam Bronstein; Amos Adler; Haytham Katash; Ora Halutz; Yair Herishanu; Katia Levytskyi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 20.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.