Literature DB >> 34314431

Computational Eurotransplant kidney allocation simulations demonstrate the feasibility and benefit of T-cell epitope matching.

Matthias Niemann1, Nils Lachmann2, Kirsten Geneugelijk3, Eric Spierings3.   

Abstract

The EuroTransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) aims at allocating organs to patients on the waiting list fairly whilst optimizing HLA match grades. ETKAS currently considers the number of HLA-A, -B, -DR mismatches. Evidently, epitope matching is biologically and clinically more relevant. We here executed ETKAS-based computer simulations to evaluate the impact of epitope matching on allocation and compared the strategies. A virtual population of 400,000 individuals was generated using the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) haplotype frequency dataset of 2011. Using this population, a waiting list of 10,400 patients was constructed and maintained during simulation, matching the 2015 Eurotransplant Annual Report characteristics. Unacceptable antigens were assigned randomly relative to their frequency using HLAMatchmaker. Over 22,600 kidneys were allocated in 10 years in triplicate using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations on 32-CPU-core cloud-computing instances. T-cell epitopes were calculated using the www.pirche.com portal. Waiting list effects were evaluated against ETKAS for five epitope matching scenarios. Baseline simulations of ETKAS slightly overestimated reported average HLA match grades. The best balanced scenario maintained prioritisation of HLA A-B-DR fully matched donors while replacing the HLA match grade by PIRCHE-II score and exchanging the HLA mismatch probability (MMP) by epitope MMP. This setup showed no considerable impact on kidney exchange rates and waiting time. PIRCHE-II scores improved, whereas the average HLA match grade diminishes slightly, yet leading to an improved estimated graft survival. We conclude that epitope-based matching in deceased donor kidney allocation is feasible while maintaining equal balances on the waiting list.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34314431     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  43 in total

1.  What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models.

Authors:  Michael A Babyak
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Allocation of organs, particularly kidneys, within Eurotransplant.

Authors:  G G Persijn
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.850

3.  Six-locus high resolution HLA haplotype frequencies derived from mixed-resolution DNA typing for the entire US donor registry.

Authors:  Loren Gragert; Abeer Madbouly; John Freeman; Martin Maiers
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.850

Review 4.  Matching donor and recipient based on predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen epitopes.

Authors:  K Geneugelijk; E Spierings
Journal:  Int J Immunogenet       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.466

5.  Association between specific HLA combinations and probability of kidney allograft loss: the taboo concept.

Authors:  I I Doxiadis; J M Smits; G M Schreuder; G G Persijn; H C van Houwelingen; J J van Rood; F H Claas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Human leukocyte antigen antibodies and chronic rejection: from association to causation.

Authors:  Paul I Terasaki; Junchao Cai
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Predicting HLA class I alloantigen immunogenicity from the number and physiochemical properties of amino acid polymorphisms.

Authors:  Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis; Afzal N Chaudhry; Linda D Sharples; David J Halsall; Timothy R Dafforn; J Andrew Bradley; Craig J Taylor
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Allocating Deceased Donor Kidneys to Candidates with High Panel-Reactive Antibodies.

Authors:  Howard M Gebel; Bertram L Kasiske; Sally K Gustafson; Joshua Pyke; Eugene Shteyn; Ajay K Israni; Robert A Bray; Jon J Snyder; John J Friedewald; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Analysis of T and B Cell Epitopes to Predict the Risk of de novo Donor-Specific Antibody (DSA) Production After Kidney Transplantation: A Two-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shintaro Sakamoto; Kenta Iwasaki; Toshihide Tomosugi; Matthias Niemann; Eric Spierings; Yuko Miwa; Kosei Horimi; Asami Takeda; Norihiko Goto; Shunji Narumi; Yoshihiko Watarai; Takaaki Kobayashi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  PIRCHE-II: an algorithm to predict indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Kirsten Geneugelijk; Eric Spierings
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.846

View more
  1 in total

1.  Alloimmune Risk Stratification for Kidney Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Oriol Bestard; Olivier Thaunat; Maria Irene Bellini; Georg A Böhmig; Klemens Budde; Frans Claas; Lionel Couzi; Lucrezia Furian; Uwe Heemann; Nizam Mamode; Rainer Oberbauer; Liset Pengel; Stefan Schneeberger; Maarten Naesens
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.842

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.