Literature DB >> 34313949

Test clamp procedure in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it a safe procedure?

Takahiro Nohara1,2, Suguru Kadomoto3, Hiroaki Iwamoto3, Hiroshi Yaegashi3, Masashi Iijima3, Shohei Kawaguchi3, Takashi Shima4, Kazuyoshi Shigehara3, Kouji Izumi3, Yoshifumi Kadono3, Chikashi Seto4, Atsushi Mizokami3.   

Abstract

We performed test clamp procedure in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to prevent massive bleeding during tumor resection and to omit dissection of non-feeding arteries around the tumor. We subsequently analyzed the safety and usefulness of the procedure. The Test clamp procedure was performed for 1 to 3 min during renal artery test ischemia prior to the actual ischemia and tumor resection. We confirmed the disappearance of blood flow around the renal tumor using color Doppler ultrasonography. If arterial blood flow around the tumor remained, we surveyed the site for other arteries that needed to be clamped and repeated the test clamp procedure until renal blood flow around the tumor disappeared. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive RAPN cases performed from July 2016 to March 2020 at our institutions and reviewed medical records. The clinical data of the RAPN cases were statistically analyzed. Sixty-four RAPN cases underwent the test clamp procedure, which was categorized as the TEST group. Test clamping was performed safely without any clamping-related complications in all cases. Eleven cases (17%) underwent partial ischemia, which was a significantly higher number than that in the control group. Massive bleeding during tumor resection was more frequent in the control group. Postoperative deterioration of estimated glomerular filtration rate did not differ significantly between both groups. Although further investigation was still necessary, our findings indicate that the test clamp procedure may be a safe and secure procedure to perform in RAPN for both patients and surgeons.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Partial clamp; Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Test clamp procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34313949     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01288-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  28 in total

1.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Choi; Ji Hye You; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Overall survival and renal function after partial and radical nephrectomy among older patients with localised renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched multicentre study.

Authors:  Jae Seung Chung; Nak Hoon Son; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Sang Chul Lee; Cheol Kwak; Sung Hoo Hong; Yong June Kim; Seok Ho Kang; Seok-Soo Byun
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Stephen A Boorjian; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Eugene D Kwon; John C Cheville; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?

Authors:  William C Huang; Elena B Elkin; Andrew S Levey; Thomas L Jang; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Davidiuk; Alexander S Parker; Colleen S Thomas; Bradley C Leibovich; Erik P Castle; Michael G Heckman; Kaitlynn Custer; David D Thiel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Homayoun Zargar; Mohamad E Allaf; Sam Bhayani; Michael Stifelman; Craig Rogers; Mark W Ball; Jeffrey Larson; Susan Marshall; Ramesh Kumar; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality.

Authors:  Laurent Zini; Paul Perrotte; Umberto Capitanio; Claudio Jeldres; Shahrokh F Shariat; Elie Antebi; Fred Saad; Jean-Jacques Patard; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Impact of Renal Hilar Control on Outcomes of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Systematic Review and Cumulative Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni E Cacciamani; Luis G Medina; Tania S Gill; Alec Mendelsohn; Fatima Husain; Lokesh Bhardwaj; Walter Artibani; Renè Sotelo; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2018-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.