| Literature DB >> 34313806 |
Julio César Castillo-Cuenca1,2, Álvaro Martínez-Moreno3, José Manuel Diaz-Cao2, Angel Entrena-García4, Jorge Fraga5, Pedro Casanova Arias5, Sonia Almería6, Ignacio García-Bocanegra7.
Abstract
A cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and associated risk factors in pigs in the largest pork-producing region in Cuba. Serum samples from 420 pigs, including 210 sows and 210 post-weaning pigs, were tested for antibodies against T. gondii using a commercial indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anti-T. gondii antibodies were detected in 56 animals (13.3%, 95% CI: 10.1-16.6). A generalized estimating equations model revealed that the risk factors associated with higher seropositivity in pigs were altitude (higher in farm's location < 250 m above sea level (masl) versus ≥ 250 masl) and age (higher in sows compared to post-weaning pigs). The results indicated that this protozoan parasite is widely distributed on pig farms in the study area, which is a public health concern since the consumption of raw or undercooked pork meat products containing tissue cysts is considered one of the main routes of T. gondii transmission worldwide. Control measures should be implemented to reduce the risk of exposure to T. gondii in pigs in Cuba.Entities:
Keywords: Cuba; Domestic pigs; Public health; Seroprevalence; Toxoplasma gondii
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34313806 PMCID: PMC8370946 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07245-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Fig. 1Map of Villa Clara province (Cuba) showing the distribution and within-farm seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii on the sampled pig farms
Distribution of the prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii, using ELISA, on pig farms in Villa Clara province (Cuba) by category. Variables with P-value < 0.20 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis (generalized estimating equation) to determine potential risk factors
| Variable | Categories | Number/overall (% positive) | OR | 95% CI | Chi-square | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farm | A | 8/60 (13.3) | NA | 25.385 | < 0.001 | |
| B | 15/60 (25.0) | |||||
| C | 0/60 (0.0) | |||||
| D | 3/60 (5.0) | |||||
| E | 6/60 (10.0) | |||||
| F | 13/60 (21.7) | |||||
| G | 11/60 (18.3) | |||||
| Altitude (m above sea level) | < 250 | 47/240 (19.6) | 4.627 | 2.20–9.72 | 18.830 | < 0.001 |
| ≥ 250 | 9/180 (5.0) | * | ||||
| Farm size | > 501 | 23/120 (19.2) | 1.918 | 1.07–3.43 | 4.497 | 0.022 |
| < 500 | 33/300 (11.0) | * | ||||
| Age | Sows | 46/210 (21.9) | 5.610 | 2.75–11.5 | 26.703 | < 0.001 |
| Post-weaning pigs | 10/210 (4.8) | * | ||||
| Sex | Male | 4/106 (3.8) | 0.627 | 0.17–2.29 | 0.505 | 0.350 |
| Female | 6/102 (5.9) | * | ||||
| Offspring per birth | < 9 | 10/32 (31.3) | 0.558 | 0.24–1.28 | 1.927 | 0.125 |
| ≥ 10 | 36/178 (20.2) | * | ||||
| Parity number | < 3 | 30/116 (25.9) | 0.588 | 0.30–1.16 | 1.927 | 0.125 |
| ≥ 4 | 16/94 (17.0) | * | ||||
| Weaning piglets | < 9 | 10/47 (21.3) | 1.05 | 0.48–2.31 | 0.014 | 0.541 |
| ≥ 10 | 36/163 (22.1) | * | ||||
| Still birth | Yes | 12/67 (17.9) | 0.70 | 0.34–1.46 | 0.918 | 0.220 |
| No | 34/143 (23.8) | * |
NA not applicable; *reference category
Fig. 2Results of the analysis of means comparing seroprevalences on the sampled farms