Literature DB >> 34313794

Coding variants in mouse and rat model organisms: mousepost and ratpost.

Steven Timmermans1,2, Claude Libert3,4.   

Abstract

Mice and rats are the most commonly used vertebrate model organisms in biomedical research. The availability of a reference genome in both animals combined with the deep sequencing of several doze of popular inbred lines also provides rich sequence variation data in these species. In some cases, such sequence variants can be linked directly to a distinctive phenotype. In previous work, we created the mouse and rat online searchable databases ("Mousepost" and "Ratpost") where small variant information for protein coding transcripts in mouse and rat inbred strains can be easily retrieved at the amino acid level. These tools are directly useful in forward genetics strategies or as a repository of existing sequence variations. Here, we perform a comparison between the "Mousepost" and "Ratpost" databases and we couple these two tools to a database of human sequence variants ClinVar. We investigated the level of redundancy and complementarity of known variants in protein coding transcripts and found that the large majority of variants is species-specific. However, a small set of positions is conserved in an inbred line between both species. We conclude that both databases are highly complementary, but this may change with further sequencing efforts in both species.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34313794     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-021-09898-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  2 in total

1.  Ensembl 2020.

Authors:  Andrew D Yates; Premanand Achuthan; Wasiu Akanni; James Allen; Jamie Allen; Jorge Alvarez-Jarreta; M Ridwan Amode; Irina M Armean; Andrey G Azov; Ruth Bennett; Jyothish Bhai; Konstantinos Billis; Sanjay Boddu; José Carlos Marugán; Carla Cummins; Claire Davidson; Kamalkumar Dodiya; Reham Fatima; Astrid Gall; Carlos Garcia Giron; Laurent Gil; Tiago Grego; Leanne Haggerty; Erin Haskell; Thibaut Hourlier; Osagie G Izuogu; Sophie H Janacek; Thomas Juettemann; Mike Kay; Ilias Lavidas; Tuan Le; Diana Lemos; Jose Gonzalez Martinez; Thomas Maurel; Mark McDowall; Aoife McMahon; Shamika Mohanan; Benjamin Moore; Michael Nuhn; Denye N Oheh; Anne Parker; Andrew Parton; Mateus Patricio; Manoj Pandian Sakthivel; Ahamed Imran Abdul Salam; Bianca M Schmitt; Helen Schuilenburg; Dan Sheppard; Mira Sycheva; Marek Szuba; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Glen Threadgold; Alessandro Vullo; Brandon Walts; Andrea Winterbottom; Amonida Zadissa; Marc Chakiachvili; Bethany Flint; Adam Frankish; Sarah E Hunt; Garth IIsley; Myrto Kostadima; Nick Langridge; Jane E Loveland; Fergal J Martin; Joannella Morales; Jonathan M Mudge; Matthieu Muffato; Emily Perry; Magali Ruffier; Stephen J Trevanion; Fiona Cunningham; Kevin L Howe; Daniel R Zerbino; Paul Flicek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The Year of the Rat: The Rat Genome Database at 20: a multi-species knowledgebase and analysis platform.

Authors:  Jennifer R Smith; G Thomas Hayman; Shur-Jen Wang; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Matthew J Hoffman; Mary L Kaldunski; Monika Tutaj; Jyothi Thota; Harika S Nalabolu; Santoshi L R Ellanki; Marek A Tutaj; Jeffrey L De Pons; Anne E Kwitek; Melinda R Dwinell; Mary E Shimoyama
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.