Tomoaki Yoh1, Satoru Seo2, Satoshi Ogiso1, Koshiro Morino1, Takahiro Nishio1, Yukinori Koyama1, Ken Fukumitsu1, Takamichi Ishii1, Kojiro Taura1, Etsuro Hatano1. 1. Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. 2. Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. rutosa@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited studies have reported the actual learning process of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). This study aimed to chronologically evaluate our 15 years' experience of LLR. METHODS: All consecutive LLRs between 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The time period was divided into three groups; first (2006-2010), second (2011-2015), and third (2016-2020) period. The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of overall (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) or major (grade ≥ IIIa) postoperative complications within 30 days. Using the IWATE criteria (four difficulty levels based on six indices), LLR was categorized as basic (< 7 points) and advanced (≥ 7 points) one. All analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 382 LLRs were gradually performed (first period, n = 54; second period, n = 114, and third period, n = 214). Low incidences of overall and major complications were maintained (9.3, 10.5, and 7.0%, p = 0.514, and 1.9, 2.6, and 2.3%, p = 1.000). Meanwhile, pure LLRs (i.e., LLRs without hand-assisted or hybrid approach) and advanced LLRs were increasingly performed in 25 (46.3%), 71 (62.3%), and 205 (95.8%) patients (p < 0.001) and 3 (5.6%), 18 (15.8%), and 58 (27.1%) patients (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that stepwise approach from basic to advanced procedures and use of hand-assisted or hybrid approach during the early phases for starting LLR practice may allow for maintaining low morbidity in specialized center.
BACKGROUND: Limited studies have reported the actual learning process of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). This study aimed to chronologically evaluate our 15 years' experience of LLR. METHODS: All consecutive LLRs between 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The time period was divided into three groups; first (2006-2010), second (2011-2015), and third (2016-2020) period. The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of overall (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) or major (grade ≥ IIIa) postoperative complications within 30 days. Using the IWATE criteria (four difficulty levels based on six indices), LLR was categorized as basic (< 7 points) and advanced (≥ 7 points) one. All analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 382 LLRs were gradually performed (first period, n = 54; second period, n = 114, and third period, n = 214). Low incidences of overall and major complications were maintained (9.3, 10.5, and 7.0%, p = 0.514, and 1.9, 2.6, and 2.3%, p = 1.000). Meanwhile, pure LLRs (i.e., LLRs without hand-assisted or hybrid approach) and advanced LLRs were increasingly performed in 25 (46.3%), 71 (62.3%), and 205 (95.8%) patients (p < 0.001) and 3 (5.6%), 18 (15.8%), and 58 (27.1%) patients (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that stepwise approach from basic to advanced procedures and use of hand-assisted or hybrid approach during the early phases for starting LLR practice may allow for maintaining low morbidity in specialized center.