Literature DB >> 34311659

Real-world migraine-related healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with improved vs. worsened/stable migraine: a panel-based chart review in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.

Pamela Vo1, Elyse Swallow2, Eric Wu2, Miriam L Zichlin2, Noah Katcher2, Monika Maier-Peuschel3, Mariantonietta Naclerio4, Daniela Ritrovato4, Santosh Tiwari5, Parth Joshi5, Matias Ferraris1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the migraine-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with improved vs. worsened/stable migraine.
METHODS: This was a follow-up to a retrospective, panel-based chart review conducted in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain among a panel of physicians (neurologists, headache specialists, and pain specialists) who agreed to participate in patient studies and had treated ≥10 migraine patients in 2017. Eligible physicians extracted data for up to five adults with ≥4 monthly migraine days (MMDs) who initiated a preventive treatment on or after 1 January 2013 and received physician care for ≥6 months after the date of the most recent preventive treatment initiation (index date). Based on the trajectory of migraine severity from the 1-month pre-index period to the 6-month post-index period, cohorts were classified as improved (converting from chronic to episodic or from chronic/episodic to <4 MMDs) or stable/worsened (remaining chronic/episodic or transforming from episodic to chronic) migraine. Migraine-related HRU and costs (2017 €) during the 6-month post-index period were compared between patients with improved vs. stable/worsened migraine.
RESULTS: Overall, 470 patient charts were analyzed, with 339 classified as improved migraine and 131 classified as stable/worsened migraine. After adjusting for within-physician correlation, country, sex, and presence of comorbidities before the index date, the improved migraine cohort had significantly fewer migraine-related physician office visits (-0.81; p < .001), emergency room/accident & emergency (ER/A&E) visits (-0.67; p < .001), and hospitalizations (-0.12; p < .001) in the 6-month post-index period vs. the stable/worsened migraine cohort. Consistent with HRU patterns, the adjusted migraine-related costs for physician office visits (-€42.23; p < .05), hospitalizations (-€215.56; p < .05), and total costs (-€396.81; p < .01) in the 6-month post-index period were significantly reduced for the improved migraine cohort vs. the stable/worsened migraine cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Over a 6-month period following initiation of preventive migraine treatment, patients with improved migraine had significantly lower migraine-related HRU and costs than those with stable/worsened migraine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare resource utilization; I; I00; I1; I10; generalized estimating equation; healthcare costs; migraine chronification; preventive treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34311659     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1953301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  1 in total

1.  Novel Migraine Therapies May Reduce Public and Personal Disadvantages for People with Migraine.

Authors:  Fidel Dominique Festin Ambat; Enrico Bentivegna; Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.744

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.