Literature DB >> 34310109

Environmental Health Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: A Visual Overview and a Renewed Call for Coordination.

Rachel M Shaffer1.   

Abstract

In the United States (U.S.), chemical evaluations and assessments are conducted by seven federal agencies responding to distinct statutory requirements and focusing on different exposure scenarios. While risk assessment is a fundamental concept in public health practice and policy, there is no clear, central, and concise summary of these processes. The novel infographic presented here depicts more than 30 different evaluation and assessment processes conducted by federal agencies for chemicals found in the environment, workplace, consumer products, hazardous waste sites, food, and/or cosmetics. The majority of these assessments are statutorily required. Most serve as sources of authoritative information to provide public health guidance or recommendations. Less than half directly result in risk management actions or regulations. Understanding these roles and processes can facilitate engagement from the broader community, including by highlighting priority areas for research to inform public health policy. This infographic also illustrates the opportunity and need for further intra- and interagency collaboration and coordination - including a particular focus on aggregate risk assessment, given that the population regularly experiences exposures from multiple sources crossing agency domains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aggregate risk; environmental health; federal policy; hazard identification; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34310109      PMCID: PMC8530530          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   11.357


  11 in total

1.  The environmental Web: a national profile of the state infrastructure for environmental health and protection.

Authors:  T A Burke; N M Shalauta; N L Tran; B S Stern
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  1997-03

2.  Acute health reference values: overview, perspective, and current forecast of needs.

Authors:  George M Woodall
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2005 Jun 11-25

Review 3.  Epidemiology and risk assessment.

Authors:  J M Samet; R Schnatter; H Gibb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Multi-pathway human exposure assessment of phthalate esters and DINCH.

Authors:  Georgios Giovanoulis; Thuy Bui; Fuchao Xu; Eleni Papadopoulou; Juan A Padilla-Sanchez; Adrian Covaci; Line S Haug; Anna Palm Cousins; Jörgen Magnér; Ian T Cousins; Cynthia A de Wit
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Epidemiology and quantitative risk assessment: a bridge from science to policy.

Authors:  I Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Leveraging Epidemiology to Improve Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Keeve E Nachman; Mary A Fox; Mary C Sheehan; Thomas A Burke; Joseph V Rodricks; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Open Epidemiol J       Date:  2011-01-19

7.  Should the scope of human mixture risk assessment span legislative/regulatory silos for chemicals?

Authors:  Richard M Evans; Olwenn V Martin; Michael Faust; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Assessing Human Exposure to Chemicals in Materials, Products and Articles: The International Risk Management Landscape for Phthalates.

Authors:  Clara M A Eichler; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; John C Little
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 9.  A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects.

Authors:  Elsie M Sunderland; Xindi C Hu; Clifton Dassuncao; Andrea K Tokranov; Charlotte C Wagner; Joseph G Allen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Statement on advancing the assessment of chemical mixtures and their risks for human health and the environment.

Authors:  Elina Drakvik; Rolf Altenburger; Yasunobu Aoki; Thomas Backhaus; Tina Bahadori; Robert Barouki; Werner Brack; Mark T D Cronin; Barbara Demeneix; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Jacob van Klaveren; Carsten Kneuer; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Erik Lebret; Leo Posthuma; Lena Reiber; Cynthia Rider; Joëlle Rüegg; Giuseppe Testa; Bart van der Burg; Hilko van der Voet; A Michael Warhurst; Bob van de Water; Kunihiko Yamazaki; Mattias Öberg; Åke Bergman
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 9.621

View more
  4 in total

1.  Practical Opportunities to Improve the Impact of Health Risk Assessment on Environmental and Public Health Decisions.

Authors:  Tine Bizjak; Davor Kontić; Branko Kontić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Time to Break the "Lock-In" Impediments to Chemicals Management.

Authors:  Jonathan Blumenthal; Miriam L Diamond; Matthew Hoffmann; Zhanyun Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  U.S. Federal Agency interests and key considerations for new approach methodologies for nanomaterials.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Patricia Ceger; David G Allen; Jayme Coyle; Raymond Derk; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; John Gordon; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Joanna Matheson; Danielle McShan; Bryant C Nelson; Anil K Patri; Penelope Rice; Liying Rojanasakul; Abhilash Sasidharan; Louis Scarano; Xiaoqing Chang
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.250

4.  Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Implementation: How the Amended Law Has Failed to Protect Vulnerable Populations from Toxic Chemicals in the United States.

Authors:  Swati D G Rayasam; Patricia D Koman; Daniel A Axelrad; Tracey J Woodruff; Nicholas Chartres
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 11.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.