P Ramezani Darmian1, Z Memarzadeh1, R Aryan1, Y Nahidi1, Z Mehri1, A Taghipour2, N Samimi3, M Amini4, P Layegh1. 1. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 2. Health Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 3. Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 4. Lung Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
This research was supported by the Vice Chancellor for Research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences under grant number 990169.
Ethical approval
All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
All patients or their legal guardians signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.Dear EditorIn December 2019, a new member of the coronavirus family emerged in Wuhan city in Hubei Province of China, and rapidly spread all over the world causing a pandemic.
,
A recent Cochrane review categorized different presentations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) into four groups: respiratory, systemic, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal. However, some bizarre manifestations like olfactory problems,
thrombotic events
and even mental problems
may exist with this infection. One of these rare presentations is skin involvement that can even be the first presentation of the disease.
Dermatologic signs and symptoms of COVID‐19 are diverse and still need investigation to be completed. We conducted a study between September and October 2020 on 387 COVID‐19 hospitalized patients in Imam Reza Hospital of Mashhad, Iran. All COVID‐19 cases were confirmed according to the diagnosis of pulmonologists and infectious disease specialists based on polymerase chain reaction test or high‐resolution computed tomography of the chest. All patients were visited by an academic dermatologist and a volunteer resident of dermatology at the patients' hospital beds.Initially, the preliminary data including age, gender, demographic information, past medical history, drug history, clinical and laboratory findings of each patient were extracted from their medical files. Then, cooperative patients were asked about the history of any dermatologic lesion from a few weeks before clinical signs and symptoms of COVID‐19 appear up to this point. Those with a positive history of these lesions were examined to define the distribution of the lesion. Furthermore, a full history regarding their dermatologic symptoms, any past medical history or family history of a skin problem was taken. For ill patients, physical examination of the skin was performed by a dermatologist. Photographs were also taken of all the patients' lesions. Additionally, we followed up each patient by telephone calls 2 weeks after each visit in order to detect further skin involvements. All the lesions' photographs were reviewed by three academic dermatologists and the final diagnosis was made based on their consensus. Skin biopsies were conducted in some cases that seemed necessary. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Board of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUMS.REC.1399.175). Written informed consent was signed by all patients or their legal guardians for those with very severe or unconscious conditions. P‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).A total of 387 patients including 205 males and 182 females were enrolled in this study. The details of demographic and baseline data of the patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Demographic and baseline data of the patients
Feature
Frequency
Percent
Gender
Male
205
53.0
Female
182
47.0
Admitted ward
ICU
57
14.8
General
329
85.2
COVID‐19 Diagnosis method
Polymerase chain reaction
123
31.8
Clinical signs and high‐resolution computed tomography
264
68.2
Hospitalization duration
≤1 week
140
36.6
>1 week
242
63.4
Outcome
Recovery
318
82.0
Death
69
18.0
Past medical history
Hypertension
190
49.1
Cardiac disease
135
34.9
Cerebrovascular accident
8
2.1
Diabetes
84
21.7
Renal disease
44
11.4
Dyslipidaemia
214
55.3
Clinical signs
Respiratory
294
76
Constitutional
167
43.2
Gastrointestinal
30
7.7
Neurologic
35
9.0
Other
2
0.5
Treatments
Immunosuppressive
103
26.6
Anti‐epileptic
33
8.5
Antiviral (Kaletra)
115
29.9
Hydroxychloroquine
336
87.5
Azithromycin
353
91.9
Ceftriaxone
366
95.3
Heparin
364
94.8
Dexamethasone
54
14.1
Anti‐inflammatory
60
15.6
Addiction
Yes
90
23.3
No
297
76.7
Demographic and baseline data of the patientsThe most prevalent accompanying disease was dyslipidaemia (214 cases; 55.3%) followed by hypertension (190 cases; 49.1%). Respiratory symptoms were present in 294 patients (76%); 167 patients (43%) experienced constitutional signs and symptoms; 29 (7.5%) had cutaneous involvement in the presence of COVID‐19 infection; 15 cases (3.9%) had dermatological symptoms before and 14 patients (3.6%) during hospitalization. Moreover, four patients (1.0%) developed skin symptoms before, 12 (3.1%) during and 13 (3.4%) after presentation of other clinical symptoms of COVID‐19 infection. The most common type of skin lesions was papule/plaque (nine cases; 2.3%) and the diagnoses of our cases included livedo reticularis/racemosa, pityrasis rosea like, herpes labialis, herpes zoster, maculopapular viral exanthema, urticarial viral rash, acral peeling, contact dermatitis and drug reaction in which the most common were livedo reticularis/racemosa (four cases; 1.0%) and acral peeling (four cases; 1.0%). There was no significant difference regarding age, gender, underlying diseases, CRP and lymphocyte levels, ICU admission and outcome of the disease in patients with different cutaneous diagnoses. (Table 2). Further studies are needed to complete these results.
Table 2
Final diagnosis of skin lesions in different genders, age groups, hospitalization statuses and disease outcomes
Feature
Gender
Hospitalization status
Age
Disease outcome
Male
Female
P
ICU
Non‐ICU
P
<30
30–60
>60
P
Recovery
Death
P
Final diagnosis: frequency (%)
Pityrasis rosea like
1 (6.3)
0 (0)
0.4
0 (0)
1 (4.8)
0.4
0 (0)
1 (6.3)
0 (0)
0.5
1 (5)
0 (0)
0.14
Herpes labialis
1 (6.3)
1 (7.7)
0 (0)
2 (9.5)
0 (0)
1 (6.3)
1 (8.3)
2 (10)
0 (0)
Herpes zoster
0 (0)
2 (15.4)
1 (14.3)
1 (4.8)
0 (0)
2 (12.5)
0 (0)
1 (5)
0 (0)
Maculopapular viral exanthema
2 (12.5)
1 (7.7)
1 (14.3)
1 (4.8)
0 (0)
2 (12.5)
0 (0)
2 (10)
0 (0)
Drug reaction
1 (6.3)
2 (15.4)
0 (0)
3 (14.3)
0 (0)
0 (0)
3 (25.0)
2 (10)
0 (0)
Livedo reticularis/ rasemoca
1 (6.3)
3 (23.1)
2 (28.6)
2 (9.5)
1 (100)
2 (12.5)
2 (16.7)
1 (5)
3 (50)
Acral peeling
4 (25.0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
4 (19.0)
0 (0)
3 (18.8)
1 (8.3)
3 (15)
1 (16.7)
Contact dermatits
1 (6.3)
2 (15.4)
2 (28.6)
1 (4.8)
0 (0)
1 (6.3)
2 (16.7)
1 (5)
1 (16.7)
Urticarial viral rash
2 (12.5)
0 (0)
0 (0)
2 (9.5)
0 (0)
1 (6.3)
1 (8.3)
2 (10)
2 (33.3)
Other
3 (18.8)
2 (15.4)
1 (14.3)
5 (19.0)
0 (0)
3 (18.8)
2 (16.7)
5 (25)
5 (83.3)
Final diagnosis of skin lesions in different genders, age groups, hospitalization statuses and disease outcomes
Authors: Michael S Xydakis; Puya Dehgani-Mobaraki; Eric H Holbrook; Urban W Geisthoff; Christian Bauer; Charlotte Hautefort; Philippe Herman; Geoffrey T Manley; Dina M Lyon; Claire Hopkins Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Ali Rostami; Mahdi Sepidarkish; Mariska M G Leeflang; Seyed Mohammad Riahi; Malihe Nourollahpour Shiadeh; Sahar Esfandyari; Ali H Mokdad; Peter J Hotez; Robin B Gasser Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2020-10-24 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Susana Majadas; Javier Pérez; Nerea M Casado-Espada; Antonio Zambrana; Alberto Bullón; Carlos Roncero Journal: Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 12.145