Literature DB >> 34308697

Correlation Between the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and Patient Reported Outcomes.

Anne L Versteeg1, Arjun Sahgal2, Ilya Laufer3, Laurence D Rhines4, Daniel M Sciubba5, James M Schuster6, Michael H Weber7, Aron Lazary8, Stefano Boriani9, Chetan Bettegowda5, Michael G Fehlings10, Michelle J Clarke11, Paul M Arnold12, Ziya L Gokaslan13, Charles G Fisher14.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: International multicenter prospective observational cohort study on patients undergoing radiation +/- surgical intervention for the treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between the total Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), individual SINS components and PROs.
METHODS: Data regarding patient demographics, diagnostics, treatment, and PROs (SF-36, SOSGOQ, EQ-5D) was collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-treatment. The SINS was assessed using routine diagnostic imaging. The association between SINS, PRO at baseline and change in PROs was examined with the Spearmans rank test.
RESULTS: A total of 307 patients, including 174 patients who underwent surgery+/- radiotherapy and 133 patients who underwent radiotherapy were eligible for analyses. In the surgery+/- radiotherapy group, 18 (10.3%) patients with SINS score between 0-6, 118 (67.8%) with a SINS between 7-12 and 38 (21.8%) with a SINS between 13-18, as compared to 55 (41.4%) SINS 0-6, 71(53.4%) SINS 7-12 and 7 (5.2%) SINS 13-18 in the radiotherapy alone group. At baseline, the total SINS and the presence of mechanical pain was significantly associated with the SOSGOQ pain domain (r = -0.519, P < 0.001) and the NRS pain score (r = 0.445, P < 0.001) for all patients. The presence of mechanical pain demonstrated to be moderately associated with a positive change in PROs at 12 weeks post-treatment.
CONCLUSION: Spinal instability, as defined by the SINS, was significantly correlated with PROs at baseline and change in PROs post-treatment. Mechanical pain, as a single SINS component, showed the highest correlations with PROs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient reported outcomes; spinal instability; spinal metastases

Year:  2021        PMID: 34308697     DOI: 10.1177/21925682211033591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Global Spine J        ISSN: 2192-5682


  3 in total

1.  Impact of Spinal Instrumentation on Neurological Outcome in Patients with Intermediate Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS).

Authors:  Moritz Lenschow; Maximilian Lenz; Niklas von Spreckelsen; Julian Ossmann; Johanna Meyer; Julia Keßling; Lukas Nadjiri; Sergej Telentschak; Kourosh Zarghooni; Peter Knöll; Moritz Perrech; Eren Celik; Max Scheyerer; Volker Neuschmelting
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  A Natural History of Patients Treated Operatively and Nonoperatively for Spinal Metastases Over 2 Years Following Treatment: Survival and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace X Xiong; Miles W A Fisher; Joseph H Schwab; Andrew K Simpson; Lananh Nguyen; Daniel G Tobert; Tracy A Balboni; John H Shin; Marco L Ferrone; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Survival after surgery for spinal metastatic disease: a nationwide multiregistry cohort study.

Authors:  Christian Carrwik; Claes Olerud; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.