Literature DB >> 34308585

[Effect of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty on femoral rotation alignment and its short-term effectiveness].

Maolin Sun1, Liu Yang1, Lin Guo1, Rui He1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the improvement of femoral rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by robotic-arm assisted positioning and osteotomy and its short-term effectiveness.
METHODS: Between June 2020 and November 2020, 60 patients (60 knees) with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee, who met the selection criteria, were selected as the study subjects. Patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. Patients were treated with robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) in trial group, and with conventional TKA in control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side and course of osteoarthritis, body mass index, and the preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), knee society score-knee (KSS-K) and KSS-function (KSS-F) scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). The clinical (KSS-K, KSS-F scores) and imaging (HKA, LDFA, MPTA, PCA) evaluation indexes of the knee joints were compared between the two groups at 3 months after operation.
RESULTS: All patients were successfully operated. The incisions in the two groups healed by first intention, with no complications related to the operation. Patients in the two groups were followed up 3-6 months, with an average of 3.9 months. KSS-K and KSS-F scores of the two groups at 3 months after operation were significantly higher than those before operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). X-ray re-examination showed that the prosthesis was in good position, and no prosthesis loosening or sinking occurred. HKA, MPTA, and PCA significantly improved in both groups at 3 months after operation ( P<0.05) except LDFA. There was no significant difference in HKA, LDFA, and MPTA between the two groups ( P>0.05). PCA in trial group was significantly smaller than that in control group ( t=2.635, P=0.010).
CONCLUSION: RATKA can not only correct knee deformity, relieve pain, improve the quality of life, but also achieve the goal of restoring accurate femoral rotation alignment. There was no adverse event after short-term follow-up and the effectiveness was satisfactory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic-arm; lower limb alignment; rotation alignment; short-term effectiveness; total knee athroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34308585      PMCID: PMC8311216          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202102043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  14 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Canovas; L Dagneaux
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  An assessment of femoral rotational alignment of mini-incision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison based on the transepicondylar line from the kneeling view and the intraoperative posterior condylar line.

Authors:  Hwa-Chang Liu; Wen-Tien Wu; Kai-Chiang Yang; Kuang-Ting Yeh; Shoichiro Sumi; Chen-Chie Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Ronald E Delanois; Jaydev B Mistry; Chukwuweike U Gwam; Nequesha S Mohamed; Ujval S Choksi; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Variation in the Posterior Condylar Angle.

Authors:  Łukasz Cieliński; Damian Kusz; Michał Wójcik; Jakub Kamiński; Marcin Kusz
Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil       Date:  2016-11-30

5.  Three-dimensional assessment of lower limb alignment: Accuracy and reliability.

Authors:  J Fürmetz; J Sass; T Ferreira; J Jalali; L Kovacs; F Mück; N Degen; P H Thaller
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  How to interpret postoperative X-rays after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nishikant Kumar; Chandrashekhar Yadav; Rishi Raj; Sumit Anand
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 7.  Knee osteoarthritis: a review of management options.

Authors:  S M Hussain; D W Neilly; S Baliga; S Patil; Rmd Meek
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 0.729

8.  Randomized, prospective, monocentric study to compare the outcome of continuous passive motion and controlled active motion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Schulz; Bernhard Krohne; Wolfgang Röder; Kirsten Sander
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.285

9.  Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M J G Blyth; I Anthony; P Rowe; M S Banger; A MacLean; B Jones
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  An innovative three-dimensional method for identifying a proper femoral intramedullary entry point in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lu-Yao Ma; Hong-Yu Wei; Fu-Yin Wan; Wan-Shou Guo; Jin-Hui Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.