Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai1, Ren-Yeong Huang1, Chia-Dan Cheng1, Wan-Chien Cheng1, David L Cochran2, Thomas T Nguyen3, Yi-Shing Shieh4, Fu-Gong Lin5,6, Cheng-En Sung7. 1. Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Department of Periodontics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. 3. Division of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 4. Department of Oral Diagnosis and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Department of Optometry, University of Kang Ning, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. peter71130000@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the prevalence of labial bone perforation (LBP) related to the associated anatomic factors in anterior mandibular region using a virtual immediate implant placement procedure. METHODS: Series qualified CBCT images of 149 participants (894 teeth) were selected to analyze the assigned anatomical parameters, including concavity depth, concavity angle, torque, and deep bone thickness. Four classes of crestal and radicular dentoalveolar bone phenotypes (CRDAPs) of mandibular anterior teeth were categorized according to the thickness of dentoalveolar bone at both crestal and radicular zones. Data were adjusted for categorical (gender and CRDAP) and continuous (age, cavity angle, cavity depth, and deep bone thickness) variables using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equation method. RESULTS: The overall probability of LBP after virtual implant placement was 21.6%. There is statistically significant higher prevalence of LBP at canine (28.5%) and CRDAP class II (29.2%) regions (p < 0.001). After adjusting confounding variables, CRDAP class II and class IV regions are more likely to have LBP when compared with CRDAP class I (control) regions (p < 0.01). The risk of LBP at canine site is 6.31 times more likely than at the central incisor (control) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using a virtual immediate implant placement technique, the prevalence of LBP is significantly higher at the mandibular canine site and thin radicular dentoalveolar phenotype in the anterior mandibular region.
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the prevalence of labial bone perforation (LBP) related to the associated anatomic factors in anterior mandibular region using a virtual immediate implant placement procedure. METHODS: Series qualified CBCT images of 149 participants (894 teeth) were selected to analyze the assigned anatomical parameters, including concavity depth, concavity angle, torque, and deep bone thickness. Four classes of crestal and radicular dentoalveolar bone phenotypes (CRDAPs) of mandibular anterior teeth were categorized according to the thickness of dentoalveolar bone at both crestal and radicular zones. Data were adjusted for categorical (gender and CRDAP) and continuous (age, cavity angle, cavity depth, and deep bone thickness) variables using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equation method. RESULTS: The overall probability of LBP after virtual implant placement was 21.6%. There is statistically significant higher prevalence of LBP at canine (28.5%) and CRDAP class II (29.2%) regions (p < 0.001). After adjusting confounding variables, CRDAP class II and class IV regions are more likely to have LBP when compared with CRDAP class I (control) regions (p < 0.01). The risk of LBP at canine site is 6.31 times more likely than at the central incisor (control) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using a virtual immediate implant placement technique, the prevalence of LBP is significantly higher at the mandibular canine site and thin radicular dentoalveolar phenotype in the anterior mandibular region.
Authors: C C Mello; C A A Lemos; F R Verri; D M Dos Santos; M C Goiato; E P Pellizzer Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 2.789