Literature DB >> 34308398

Expansion of a national Covid-19 alert level system to improve population health and uphold the values of Indigenous peoples.

Amanda Kvalsvig1, Nick Wilson1, Cheryl Davies1, Carmen Timu-Parata1,2, Virginia Signal1, Michael G Baker1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34308398      PMCID: PMC8272795          DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac        ISSN: 2666-6065


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Aotearoa New Zealand's (NZ) Alert Level system for Covid-19 pandemic control appears to have been a highly effective instrument for pandemic response communication and implementation and has contributed to successful elimination of Covid-19 [1], [2]. The system was designed for the policy settings of NZ's first outbreak (February to May 2020), but it no longer aligns well with new evidence and the much more sophisticated response to recent outbreaks, where the aim is to maximise health benefits while minimising social and economic harm. Importantly, several aspects of the Alert Level design and implementation have not worked adequately for Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa NZ. In this proposed revision we consider the evolving requirements for the system to address outbreaks before the population is substantially vaccinated and to establish a more sustainable future role in protecting population health.

A revised Covid-19 Alert Level system as valuable legacy infrastructure

The Alert Level system is well-positioned to become an enduring legacy of the Covid-19 pandemic. With some revision this system could provide a flexible infection control framework to manage the next phase of the pandemic and to address NZ's longstanding burden of infectious disease incidence and inequities [3] by building in prevention synergies with other endemic, epidemic, and pandemic diseases. There is also potential for benchmarking infection control to support mutual travel agreements with other countries, particularly in the Western Pacific. The past year has amply demonstrated the value of Indigenous models of health for responding to public health emergencies [4]. This new version aims to be explicitly equity-promoting and to uphold Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi, the founding document of NZ's constitution.

Key aspects of the Alert Level revision

The proposed changes are summarised in the points below and in Table 1, [10]; we present a more detailed discussion in the online Supplement. Benefits of the revised system include:
Table 1

Summary of the proposed revised Alert Levels for future management of the Covid-19 pandemic and other infectious disease outbreaks. This system is optimised for infections with similar transmission characteristics to SARS-CoV-2 and may need to be adapted to respond to other infections, including those transmitted by other routes (eg, direct contact as in Ebola).

Upholding Te Tiriti and implementing a more equitable response: The current system has made several assumptions that do not necessarily hold for Māori [4], for example, that ‘households’ are small nuclear families. In many regards the current system is rules-focused rather than building on the known effectiveness of a strengths-based, mana-enhancing (self-empowering) approach. Māori knowledge and capability can ensure that the system is more responsive to populations at risk [5] and more effective at protecting community wellbeing in a public health emergency. Better calibrating controls to the level of risk: A more fine-grained set of response options is required to retain a safe level of outbreak control when lifting stay-at-home requirements, and to ensure that when there is an outbreak in one region, control measures in the rest of the country appropriately reflect heightened risk. A much clearer approach to regional travel is required to avoid seeding of outbreaks into other regions. Responding to new knowledge: Recent experience needs to be translated into improved outbreak control [6], eg, increased emphasis on measures to prevent spread via inhalation (face masks, ventilation, filtration) [7], [8], particularly in high-risk settings for superspreading events. Another key lesson is the need for support to mitigate severe and inequitable hardships, in particular food insecurity, incurred by the pandemic response. Signalling improvements and innovation: The proposed revised Alert Levels (organised into three bands) can facilitate effective communication that links required actions to a more intuitively recognisable level of risk. Aligning revision of Alert Levels to vaccine rollout provides an opportunity to communicate to the public that the pandemic response is changing in several important ways, enabling a smooth transition to a post-pandemic future. Supporting harmonisation with Australia (and the wider world): New Zealand has an arrangement with Australia for quarantine-free travel between the two countries and this ‘green zone’ is likely to be expanded in future. This process would be supported by harmonisation of systems and approaches for Covid-19 management, including ways of assessing and managing outbreak risk. A more rational and evidence-informed Alert Level system provides an ideal opportunity to develop a consistent approach to Covid-19 management across multiple countries. Establishing protective measures for a safer future: In 2020 the Covid-19 response in NZ effectively prevented, and in some cases even eliminated, transmission of non-Covid infectious diseases [9]. Over the next one to two years lifting some Covid-19 restrictions (in particular border controls) will generate a more complex infectious diseases environment that will include other epidemic, endemic, and pandemic infectious disease threats. There is an opportunity now to strengthen the Alert Level system to improve and protect population health on a timescale that extends far beyond the Covid-19 pandemic. Summary of the proposed revised Alert Levels for future management of the Covid-19 pandemic and other infectious disease outbreaks. This system is optimised for infections with similar transmission characteristics to SARS-CoV-2 and may need to be adapted to respond to other infections, including those transmitted by other routes (eg, direct contact as in Ebola).

Declaration of Competing Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  7 in total

1.  Increasing incidence of serious infectious diseases and inequalities in New Zealand: a national epidemiological study.

Authors:  Michael G Baker; Lucy Telfar Barnard; Amanda Kvalsvig; Ayesha Verrall; Jane Zhang; Michael Keall; Nick Wilson; Teresa Wall; Philippa Howden-Chapman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jennifer Summers; Hao-Yuan Cheng; Hsien-Ho Lin; Lucy Telfar Barnard; Amanda Kvalsvig; Nick Wilson; Michael G Baker
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2020-10-21

3.  The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.

Authors:  You Li; Harry Campbell; Durga Kulkarni; Alice Harpur; Madhurima Nundy; Xin Wang; Harish Nair
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Jose L Jimenez; Kimberly A Prather; Zeynep Tufekci; David Fisman; Robert Schooley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Impact of the COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions on influenza and other respiratory viral infections in New Zealand.

Authors:  Q Sue Huang; Tim Wood; Lauren Jelley; Tineke Jennings; Sarah Jefferies; Karen Daniells; Annette Nesdale; Tony Dowell; Nikki Turner; Priscilla Campbell-Stokes; Michelle Balm; Hazel C Dobinson; Cameron C Grant; Shelley James; Nayyereh Aminisani; Jacqui Ralston; Wendy Gunn; Judy Bocacao; Jessica Danielewicz; Tessa Moncrieff; Andrea McNeill; Liza Lopez; Ben Waite; Tomasz Kiedrzynski; Hannah Schrader; Rebekah Gray; Kayla Cook; Danielle Currin; Chaune Engelbrecht; Whitney Tapurau; Leigh Emmerton; Maxine Martin; Michael G Baker; Susan Taylor; Adrian Trenholme; Conroy Wong; Shirley Lawrence; Colin McArthur; Alicia Stanley; Sally Roberts; Fahimeh Rahnama; Jenny Bennett; Chris Mansell; Meik Dilcher; Anja Werno; Jennifer Grant; Antje van der Linden; Ben Youngblood; Paul G Thomas; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Effectiveness of Mask Wearing to Control Community Spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  John T Brooks; Jay C Butler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Successful Elimination of Covid-19 Transmission in New Zealand.

Authors:  Michael G Baker; Nick Wilson; Andrew Anglemyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  A kia ora, a wave and a smile: an urban marae-led response to COVID-19, a case study in manaakitanga.

Authors:  Cheryl Davies; Carmen Timu-Parata; Jeannine Stairmand; Bridget Robson; Amanda Kvalsvig; Dominique Lum; Virginia Signal
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-05-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.