| Literature DB >> 34308108 |
Hirotsugu Aiga1, Kanae Abe2, Emmanuel Randriamampionona3, Angèle Razafitompo Razafinombana4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of addressing malnutrition is increasing in the context of children's health and their academic performances. Childhood malnutrition further could reduce a country's economic productivity. No earlier study adequately estimated the causalities between schoolchildren's malnutrition and their academic performances. How nutritional status contributes to children's academic performances has never been reported from Madagascar. This study aims to estimate the possible causalities between their nutritional status and academic performances in rural Madagascar.Entities:
Keywords: malnutrition; nutrition assessment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34308108 PMCID: PMC8258079 DOI: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Nutr Prev Health ISSN: 2516-5542
Figure 1Causal models between malnutrition and learning capacities.
Characteristics of sampled schoolchildren 5–14 years of age, their malnutrition prevalence, and learning capacities
| Characteristics in form of categorical and ordinal variables | n | (%) |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 210 | 53.4 |
| Female | 183 | 46.6 |
| Household’s ownership of land | ||
| Own land for housing or farming | 85 | 21.6 |
| Don’t own land for housing or farming | 308 | 78.4 |
| Household’s ownership of mobile phone | ||
| Own mobile phone | 271 | 69.0 |
| Don’t own mobile phone | 122 | 31.0 |
| Major income source of child’s household | ||
| Daily labour | 140 | 35.6 |
| Agriculture and crop sales | 118 | 30.0 |
| Selling, trading and commerce | 45 | 11.5 |
| Skilled wage labour | 28 | 7.1 |
| Unskilled wage labour | 26 | 6.6 |
| Handicraft and small-scale industry | 25 | 6.4 |
| Livestock and sales of animal | 5 | 1.3 |
| Others | 6 | 1.5 |
| Education attainment of mother or caregiver | ||
| Never gone to school | 15 | 3.8 |
| Dropped out from primary school | 185 | 47.1 |
| Primary school | 149 | 37.9 |
| Secondary school | 37 | 9.4 |
| High school | 6 | 1.5 |
| University and other higher education | 1 | 0.3 |
| Primary school a child enrolled in | ||
| Ambohimarina primary school | 25 | 6.4 |
| Ambohitrarahaba primary school | 106 | 27.0 |
| Ambohitsoa primary school | 38 | 9.7 |
| Ambovona primary school | 9 | 2.3 |
| Ankadinandriana primary school | 21 | 5.3 |
| Isahafa primary school | 45 | 11.5 |
| Ikianja primary school | 31 | 7.9 |
| Soavinandriamanitra primary school | 35 | 8.9 |
| Tsarahasina primary school | 50 | 12.7 |
| Viliahazo primary school | 33 | 8.4 |
| Grade | ||
| First grade | 186 | 47.3 |
| Second grade | 207 | 52.7 |
|
|
|
|
| Age (month) | 86.1 | 16.1 |
| Household size (person/household) | 5.4 | 1.73 |
| School attendance rate (%) | 90.5 | 14.4 |
| Number of meals on the previous day (meal/day) | 2.9 | 0.16 |
| Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) (pt)* | 6.3 | 1.33 |
|
|
|
|
| Stunting | 137 | 34.9 (95% CI 30.2 to 39.8) |
| Underweight† | 145 | 38.0 (95% CI 33.1 to 43.0) |
| Thinness | 44 | 11.2 (95% CI 8.3 to 14.7) |
| Overweight | 4 | 1.0 (95% CI 0.3 to 2.6) |
| |
|
|
| Mathematical proficiency‡ | ||
| Level 1: beginner | 237 | 62.5 |
| Level 2: simple addition | 49 | 12.9 |
| Level 3: simple subtraction | 86 | 22.7 |
| Level 4: 2-digit addition/subtraction | 6 | 1.6 |
| Level 5: multiplication | 1 | 0.3 |
| National language proficiency§ | ||
| Level 1: beginner | 259 | 68.7 |
| Level 2: letter | 53 | 14.1 |
| Level 3: word | 44 | 11.7 |
| Level 4: paragraph | 17 | 4.5 |
| Level 5: essay | 4 | 1.1 |
*Score calculated based on 12 food groups consumed at a household on the previous day (min 0–max 12).24
†n=388. Eleven children older than 120.8 months of age were excluded, as their z-score for weight for age cannot be calculated.19
‡n=379. Fourteen children were excluded, as they were absent from the examinations of mathematics.
§n=377. Sixteen children were excluded, as they were absent from the examinations of national language.
Figure 2Comparison of attendance rate between malnutrition and not malnutrition schoolchildren 5–14 years of age.
Figure 3Association between attendance rate and learning capacities among schoolchildren 5–14 years of age (n=393).
Ordinal regressions on subject proficiencies with background variables
| Background variables | Mathematical proficiency | National language proficiency | ||||
| B: Coefficient estimate | 95% CI |
| B: Coefficient estimate | 95% CI |
| |
|
| ||||||
| Attendance rate (%) | 0.027 | (0.005–0.048) | 0.014* | 0.017 | (0.042–0.076) | <0.001** |
| Grade * | (Dropped due to multicollinearity) | (Dropped due to multicollinearity) | ||||
|
| ||||||
| | ||||||
| Stunted | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Not stunted | 0.620 | (0.105–1.136) | 0.018* | 0.925 | (-0.499–0.549) | 0.925 |
| | ||||||
| Underweight | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Not underweight | (Dropped due to multicollinearity) | (Dropped due to multicollinearity) | ||||
| | ||||||
| Thin | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Not Thin | 0.681 | (-0.076–1.432) | 0.076 | 1.007 | (0.160–1.853) | 0.020* |
| | ||||||
| Overweight | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Not overweight | −0.917 | (-2.988–1.154) | 0.385 | 0.936 | (-1.764–3.636) | 0.497 |
| Number of meals on the previous day | −0.439 | (-2.226–1.349) | 0.630 | −0.700 | (-2.438–1.039) | 0.430 |
| Household diet diversity score (%) | 0.160 | (-0.026–0.345) | 0.091 | 0.080 | (-0.114–0.274) | 0.419 |
|
| ||||||
| | ||||||
| Male | −0.152 | (-0.597–0.505) | 0.505 | −0.425 | (-0.899–0.050) | 0.079 |
| Female | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Age(months) | 0.046 | (0.030–0.062) | <0.001** | 0.059 | (0.042–0.076) | <0.001** |
| Number of household members(person) | 0.113 | (-0.026–0.251) | 0.111 | 0.059 | (-0.084–0.203) | 0.417 |
|
| ||||||
| | ||||||
| Own land for house/farm | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Don’t own land for house/farm | −0.279 | (-0.273–0.832) | 0.321 | 0.378 | (-0.197–0.953) | 0.197 |
| | ||||||
| Own mobile phone | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Don’t own mobile phone | −0.172 | (-0.655–0.321) | 0.494 | −0.487 | (-1.012–0.038) | 0.069 |
| | ||||||
| Daily labour | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Agriculture and crop sales | −0.180 | (-0.789–0.428) | 0.561 | −0.288 | (-0.933–0.357) | 0.381 |
| Selling, trading and commerce | −0.864 | (-1.578–−0.149) | 0.018 * | −0.318 | (-1.073–0.437) | 0.409 |
| Skilled wage labour | −0.557 | (-1.397–0.282) | 0.193 | −0.238 | (-1.135–0.659) | 0.603 |
| Unskilled wage labour | −0.138 | (-1.094–0.819) | 0.778 | 0.044 | (-0.999–1.087) | 0.934 |
| Handicraft and small-scale industry | −0.786 | (-1.695–0.124) | 0.090 | −0.359 | (-1.304–0.585) | 0.456 |
| Livestock and sales of animal | 0.010 | (-1.947–1.966) | 0.992 | −1.170 | (-2.932–0.591) | 0.193 |
| Others † | 1.139 | (-1.231–3.510) | 0.346 | 15.454 | (15.454–15.454) | n.a.‡ |
| | ||||||
| Dropped out from primary school | (Reference) | (Reference) | ||||
| Never gone to school | 0.148 | (-1.421–1.124) | 0.819 | −0.150 | (-1.502–1.201) | 0.827 |
| Primary school | −0.455 | (-0.952–0.043) | 0.073 | −0.351 | (-0.883–0.181) | 0.196 |
| Secondary school | −0.571 | (-1.347–0.206) | 0.150 | 0.575 | (-1.393–0.242) | 0.168 |
| High school | 15.703 | (15.703–15.703) | n.a.‡ | 15.278 | (15.278–15.278) | n.a.‡ |
| University and other higher education | −0.727 | (-4.440–2.986) | 0.701 | −1.104 | (-4.741–2.533) | 0.552 |
|
|
|
| ||||
*Indicates either first grade or second grade.
†Includes: (1) remittance from family members; (2) government allowance (eg, pension); and (3) begging and assistance.
‡SPSS was unable to calculate p value.
§ *P <0.05, **P <0.01
n.a., not applicable.
Figure 4Hypothetical causal paths between malnutrition and learning capacities.
Possible causalities between malnutrition and learning capacities
| Causality between two variables | Three conditions for a causality | Possible causality | ||
| (Condition 1) | (Condition 2) | (Condition 3) | ||
| | ||||
| (Step 1) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| (Step 2) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| | ||||
| (Step 1) | No | Yes | Not necessarily | No |
| (Step 2) | No | No | Yes | No |
*See figure 2.
†See figure 3.
‡Coefficient estimate for not being stunted in multiple regression model with attendance rate (%) and other all background variables as dependent and independent variables, respectively.
§Coefficient estimate for not being thin in multiple regression model with attendance rate (%) and other all background variables as dependent and independent variables, respectively.
¶See table 2.
** * P <0.05