Ching Chang Lin1, Takurou N Murakami2, Masayuki Chikamatsu2, Takeru Bessho3, Miwako Furue1, Hiroshi Segawa1,3,4. 1. Department of General System Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan. 2. Global Zero Emission Research Center (GZR), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo 100-8921, Japan. 3. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan. 4. Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.
Abstract
A sodium chloride modification was applied where different amounts of sodium chloride was physically blended in a tin oxide colloid solution to passivate the interface between the electron transport layer (ETL) and perovskite layer and improve the performance of perovskite solar cells. Sodium chloride-modified tin oxide was utilized as the electron transport material to fabricate perovskite solar cells. It was found that sodium chloride-modified tin oxide as an ETL could considerably enhance the performance of the device compared to pristine tin oxide. The power conversion efficiency of the perovskite solar cell displayed 8.8% remarkable improvement from 18.7 ± 0.4% to 20.3 ± 0.3% on average and 9.5% improvement from 18.9 to 20.7% in champion devices because of the considerable enhancement of the fill factor when 25 mM sodium chloride-modified tin oxide as the ETL was used in comparison with pristine tin oxide.
A sodium chloride modification was applied where different amounts of sodium chloride was physically blended in a tin oxide colloid solution to passivate the interface between the electron transport layer (ETL) and perovskite layer and improve the performance of perovskite solar cells. Sodium chloride-modified tin oxide was utilized as the electron transport material to fabricate perovskite solar cells. It was found that sodium chloride-modified tin oxide as an ETL could considerably enhance the performance of the device compared to pristine tin oxide. The power conversion efficiency of the perovskite solar cell displayed 8.8% remarkable improvement from 18.7 ± 0.4% to 20.3 ± 0.3% on average and 9.5% improvement from 18.9 to 20.7% in champion devices because of the considerable enhancement of the fill factor when 25 mM sodium chloride-modified tin oxide as the ETL was used in comparison with pristine tin oxide.
Perovskite
solar cells are one of the most promising photovoltaic
technologies and have made extraordinary advances in production efficiency
and simple processes. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) performance
of perovskite solar cells has increased from 3.8 to 25.2% within the
last 10 years.[1−7] The rapid progress is ascribed to not only fine intrinsic properties
of perovskite materials such as long charge-carrier diffusion length,
lower defect density, and appropriate bandgap,[8−12] but also the numerous research studies on process
engineering such as crystal growth control, composition optimization,
and interface engineering.[13−18] However, defects inperovskite solar cells play a crucial role in
determining the final performance of the device, increasing the losses
of nonradiative recombination inperovskite photovoltaics.[19−21] A large defect density inperovskite solar cells has a destructive
effect on device performance and modification of electron transport
material is therefore considered as a feasible solution to this problem
since it can not only passivate defects but also enhance the electrical
properties of the electron transport material. Several studies have
developed interface and grain boundary defect passivation for perovskite
solar cells and achieved higher PCE performance.[22−25] A general perovskite photovoltaic
has a perovskite layer between the hole and electron charge transport
layers. The perovskite layer has two interfaces contacting the hole
and electron charge transport layers. Modifying the interface between
the perovskite layer and hole transport layer (HTL) is comparatively
popular because solvents used for the HTL fabricated on a perovskite
layer normally have limited solubility for passivation materials.[26−30] For instance, You’s group demonstrated a planar perovskite
solar cell with 1.179 V open-circuit voltage and 23.3% of certified
PCE by applying phenethylammonium iodide between perovskite and the
HTL interface as a passivation layer.[6]It is believed that the quality of the electron transport layer
(ETL) and perovskiteis related to the substrate interface state,
defect type, and film composition.[31] By
studying the interface between the ETL and perovskite layers of the
device, researchers found complex changes at the interface, such as
dipole generation and band bending. Therefore, it is important for
the ETL to contain high film quality, have better interface contact
with the perovskite layer, and achieve energetic alignment. In order
to achieve the above targets, a series of passivation measures for
the ETL has been implemented. Pang’s group synthesized a chlorine-capped
SnO2 colloidal nanocrystal as the ETL. The ion exchange
between I– and Cl– could improve
the interface quality and mitigate the interfacial recombination.[32] In addition, the trap density could be reduced
and nonradiative recombination could be suppressed by directly adding
passivation halidesinto the precursor solution of perovskite materials.[33−35] K+ and Na+ ions exist in the perovskite layer
and the grain boundaries also have numerous types of benefits to the
defect passivation.[4,36] Also, sodium chloride-doped TiO2 was applied to enhance the planar perovskite solar cell performance
via contact passivation of the TiO2/perovskiteinterface.[37] However, it is still a challenge to passivate
the defects inperovskite photovoltaics, particularly for the SnO2 ETL.In this study, we have successfully achieved planar
structured
perovskite solar cells based on SnO2 ETL and NaCl-modified
SnO2 ETL. It was found that the NaCl doping treatment enhanced
the film conductivity and optimized the perovskite film with high-coverage
and uniform morphology via facile single coating of SnO2 colloidal dispersion containing NaCl. In contrast to previous studies,
our approach simply incorporates different amounts of NaClinto the
single-step spin-coating of tin oxide colloid dispersion without any
complex procedure such as solvent engineering, sequential process,
or the application of flowing gas. The sodium chloride modification
ETL could passivate the interface between the ETL and perovskite layer
and improve performance of the perovskite solar cells. This research
accomplished this by using a NaCl-doped SnO2 composite
as the ETL from which the Cl– and Na+ ions will passivate the interface of the ETL and perovskite layer
effectively.[32,36,37] It was found that sodium chloride-modified tin oxide as an ETL could
considerably enhance the performance of the device compared to pristine
tin oxide. Defect density in the perovskite layer was also reduced
because of the enlarged perovskite crystal and a suitable amount of
nonreacted lead iodide passivates grain boundaries of the perovskite
crystal when a portion of sodium chloride was dissolved in the perovskite
precursor solution. Both the enhanced quality of the ETL and reduced
defect density in the perovskite layer led to significantly promoted
electron transfer efficiency from the perovskite layer to the ETL.
The PCE of the perovskite solar cell displayed 8.8% remarkable improvement
from 18.7 ± 0.4% to 20.3 ± 0.3% on average and 9.5% improvement
from 18.9 to 20.7% in champion devices because of the considerable
enhancement of fill factor (FF) when 25 mM sodium chloride-modified
tin oxide as the ETL was used in comparison with pristine tin oxide.
This facile sodium chloride modification strategy to tin oxide had
achieved great success and may provide an opportunity for improving
the performance of perovskite solar cells.
Results
and Discussion
The structure of perovskite solar cells using
the 25 mM NaCl-dopedSnO2 composite as the ETLis illustrated in Figure , and the scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) cross-section images of the perovskite solar cells
using NaCl-doped SnO2 and undoped SnO2 device
are displayed in Figure . The thickness of each layer could be obtained through the above
cross-section image, where the Spiro-MeOTAD layer (HTL) was ca. 140
nm, the perovskite layer was about 560 nm, the NaCl-doped SnO2 layer (ETL) was approximately 40 nm, and undoped SnO2 ETL was approximately 30 nm. The PCE, open-circuit voltage,
short-circuit current density, and FF at various NaCl concentrations
are shown in Figure . The FF increases after the introduction of NaCl up to a concentration
of 25 mM. The PCE reaches the highest value of 20.7% with the NaCl
concentration of 25 mM, apparently improving the device performance
compared to control devices (PCE 18.9% with only the SnO2 ETL). The hysteresis could also be improved by NaCl treatment, and
the hysteresis reaches the lowest value of 0.5% with the NaCl concentration
of 25 mM (Figure S3).
Figure 1
Fabrication process of
the NaCl-doped SnO2 composite
ETL and the device structure of planar perovskite solar cells.
Figure 2
SEM cross-section image of a perovskite solar cell with
(a and
b) 25 mM NaCl-doped SnO2; (c and d) undoped SnO2 ETL.
Figure 3
PCE, FF, Voc, and Jsc of SnO2 ETL perovskite solar cells
at various
concentrations of NaCl.
Fabrication process of
the NaCl-doped SnO2 composite
ETL and the device structure of planar perovskite solar cells.SEM cross-section image of a perovskite solar cell with
(a and
b) 25 mM NaCl-doped SnO2; (c and d) undoped SnO2 ETL.PCE, FF, Voc, and Jsc of SnO2 ETLperovskite solar cells
at various
concentrations of NaCl.The PCE of best cells
fabricated by NaCl-doped SnO2 and
SnO2is presented in Figure and Table . The perovskite solar cells with NaCl-doped SnO2 and with only SnO2 show power conversion efficiencies
of 20.7 and 18.9%, respectively, under forward scan, and 20.1 and
18.5% under reverse scan. The improved PCE in the NaCl-doped SnO2perovskite solar cell is mainly caused by the obvious enhancement
in FF. The Jsc value is slightly increased
owing to the higher charge extraction efficiency in the NaCl-dopedSnO2perovskite solar cells, as indicated by the slightly
better external quantum efficiency (EQE) values (Figure ).
Figure 4
I–V curves of the NaCl-doped
SnO2 and SnO2 ETL best cells under forward scan.
Table 1
I–V Performance
of Best Cells Using SnO2- and NaCl-Doped
SnO2 Composite ETLs
ETL
direction
Jsc (mA/cm2)
Voc (V)
FF
PCE (%)
SnO2
forward
25.292
1.044
0.715
18.89
reverse
25.047
1.042
0.709
18.50
25 mM NaCl-doped
SnO2
forward
25.527
1.069
0.758
20.68
reverse
25.242
1.067
0.746
20.09
Figure 5
EQE spectra of the best cells based on NaCl-doped SnO2 and SnO2 ETLs.
I–V curves of the NaCl-dopedSnO2 and SnO2 ETL best cells under forward scan.EQE spectra of the best cells based on NaCl-doped SnO2 and SnO2 ETLs.To realize
the efficiency improvement caused by the doping of NaClinto the SnO2 ETL, this study indicated the properties
of SnO2 colloid solution, ETL, and perovskite layer with
and without NaCl. N-x was employed to indicate different
concentrations of NaCl physically blended inSnO2 colloid
solution, where x represents the doping concentration
in mM. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis and zeta potential
were implemented to investigate the agglomeration of SnO2 particles inwater solution when different concentrations of NaCl
were doped. Figure shows the number distribution and the cumulative proportion of different
sizes of SnO2 particles inwater solution. The corresponding
average particle size of SnO2 particles is summarized in Table . The number distribution
of SnO2 particles was rarely changed regardless of NaCl
concentrations as shown in Figure . The average particle size is less than 10 nm when
NaCl was introduced up to a concentration of 50 mM. However, a conspicuous
shift in average particle size was observed, especially in the N-100
condition. The zeta potential is a physical quantity that quantitatively
describes the degree of electrostatic repulsion between the charged
particles, and a colloid dispersion with a high zeta potential can
resist the aggregation of the nanoparticles and remain stable.[38] The zeta potential is −57.7 mV for the
reference solution, but it reduces to −26.3 mV after adding
100 mM NaCl (Table S1). The decreased zeta
potential and increased average particle size suggest the occurrence
of colloid coagulation. The SnO2 colloid coagulation can
be explained by the ion property of NaCl. Adding NaCl, a strong electrolyte,
shields the negative charges of the colloidal SnO2 nanoparticles and
causes them to clump together to form larger aggregates.[39] Those NaCl would interact with KOH serving as
the dispersion agent inSnO2 colloidal solution,[40] reducing repulsive forces between each SnO2 particles. Therefore, the agglomeration of SnO2 particles happened because of the incorporation of NaCl.
Figure 6
Number distribution
and cumulative proportion of different sizes
of SnO2 particles in (a) N-0, (b) N-25, (c) N-50, and (d)
N-100 colloid solutions.
Table 2
Average
Size of SnO2 Particles
in Different Concentrations of NaCl Water Solution
ETL
N-0
N-25
N-50
N-100
average size (nm)
2.5 ± 0.7
2.8 ± 1.5
8.5 ± 2.4
51.9 ± 14.6
Number distribution
and cumulative proportion of different sizes
of SnO2 particles in (a) N-0, (b) N-25, (c) N-50, and (d)
N-100 colloid solutions.To verify that NaCl was indeed incorporated in the as-spun SnO2 layer and to study the influence of NaCl to SnO2 film, SEM and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were applied
to investigate the SnO2 film quality and the existence
of NaCl. The polyhedral crystals in the SEM image refer to the fluorine
tin oxide (FTO) substrate (Figure ). Annealing of the as-spun SnO2 film will
cause the agglomeration of SnO2 particles.[41] The presence of NaCl prevents SnO2 particles
from aggregating while annealing at 60 °C, resulting in a well-distributed
ETL. The increasing signal quantity of Cl– element
mapping from EDS directly proved that NaCl was successfully doped
into the SnO2 layer under different concentrations (Figure b,d,f,h). Notice
that the Cl element signal also emerged in N-0, which presumably came
from the glass substrate itself.
Figure 7
SEM images and EDS Cl– element mapping of (a,
b) N-0; (c, d) N-25; (e, f) N-50, and (g, h) N-100 SnO2 film.
SEM images and EDS Cl– element mapping of (a,
b) N-0; (c, d) N-25; (e, f) N-50, and (g, h) N-100 SnO2 film.Transmittance of FTO/NaCl-dopedSnO2is shown in Figure . Doping NaClinto
SnO2 had scarcely any influence on the transmittance, which
is favorable since light being absorbed by perovskite layer needs
to penetrate through FTO glass and ETL as the prerequisite. A lower
transmittance means a lower amount of light harvested by perovskite,
causing a drastic decrease in device performance, especially in short-circuit
current density (Jsc). The SnO2 layer is very thin and the amount of NaCl actually deposited on
it is too less to shade the incoming light, resulting in the unchanged
transmittance consequently.
Figure 8
Transmittance of FTO/NaCl-SnO2.
Transmittance of FTO/NaCl-SnO2.Despite the consistency of transmittance, the conductivity
had
a conspicuous change after NaCl doping. The electric property of NaCl-dopedSnO2 films could be determined through the current–voltage
characteristics (I–V curves)
of the FTO/NaCl-doped SnO2/Au structure and the result
is shown in Figure . According to the equation: I = σ0Ad–1V, where Iis the current, σ0 is the conductivity
of the films, A represents the area of the film, d is the thickness, and V is the applied
voltage.[42] The calculated conductivities
are listed in Table . The conductivity of SnO2 was enhanced and reached its
maximum with an approximately 1000 times promotion when 50 mM NaCl
was doped inSnO2. Different additives into SnO2 will ameliorate the conductivity of the SnO2 film in
various ways, such as boosting the disaggregation of SnO2 colloid to form a compact layer,[43] elevating
free electron density in the conduction band of SnO2 via
providing free electrons from the additives,[44] and reducing defects inETL.[45] The enhancement
of conductivity by adding NaClinSnO2 here presumably
resulted from the much denser SnO2 layer, originating from
the well dispersed SnO2 particles and NaCl filling vacancies
between SnO2 particles. A dense SnO2 layer could
provide more pathways for electron transportation. The lower amount
of vacancies by the passivation of NaClin the SnO2 layer
would also reduce the probability of electron scattering, which is
destructive for charge transfer. However, the overdose of NaCl addition
would pull down the effective conductivity of the as-prepared SnO2 film contrarily (in N-100 case). This could be explained
by the fact that NaClis not a well electrically conductive material
in the solid state, and charge scattering originating from NaCl particles
may not be ignored anymore.
Figure 9
I–V curves of the FTO/NaCl-doped
SnO2/Au planar structure with different NaCl doping concentrations.
The inset shows the schematic device structure for conductivity measurement.
Table 3
Conductivities of FTO/NaCl-Doped SnO2/Au with Different NaCl Doping Concentrations
ETL
N-0
N-25
N-50
N-100
conductivity (S/cm)
2.10 × 10–8
5.92 × 10–7
1.36 × 10–5
5.19 × 10–6
I–V curves of the FTO/NaCl-dopedSnO2/Au planar structure with different NaCl doping concentrations.
The inset shows the schematic device structure for conductivity measurement.The effects of various NaCl concentrations
on the surface morphology
and crystallinity of the perovskite films were evaluated by using
X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and SEM (Figures S1 and S2). Considering that NaCl was
just physically blended with SnO2 particles inwater solution,
it was certain that some NaCl would exist on the surface of the as-spun
NaCl-doped SnO2 film, affecting the following crystal growth
of perovskite. Figure shows the XRD pattern of FTO/NaCl-doped SnO2/perovskite
devices. The asterisk marked peaks stood for the tetragonal tin oxide
from FTO and as-spun SnO2. The hashtag labeled peaks represented
lead iodide (001). Peaks with labeled lattice planes came from the
perovskite crystal. The perovskite material used here as a light harvester
was cesium doped formamidinium lead iodide with chemical formula HC(NH2)2PbI3, abbreviated as FAPbI3. The FAPbI3 perovskite crystal can be divided into two
phases, which are alpha phase and delta phase.[46,47] α-FAPbI3 belongs to the cubic lattice system with
black color and has the desired properties for photovoltaics, while
δ-FAPbI3 is a hexagonal lattice possessing yellow
color and is unsuitable for light harvesting. The as-synthesized α-FAPbI3 will easily change to δ-FAPbI3 at room temperature,
diminishing device performance, however. Fortunately, this problem
could be solved by cesium doping. Cs+ cations can fractionally
substitute FA+ cations at the A site of the perovskite
crystal, forming CsFA1–PbI3, where x is the
fraction of doped cesium. The partial substitution of FA+ ions (1.9–2.2 Å) by much smaller Cs+ions
(1.81 Å) will significantly improve its stability and the photovoltaic
behavior.[46−48] As we could see in Figure , the peak of δ-FAPbI3 located
at 11.78°[46,47,49] was not found and the CsPbI3 peak positioned at 9.8°
was not observed either, indicating that cesium atoms were successfully
doped into α-FAPbI3 and pure CsFA1–PbI3 was
produced.
Figure 10
XRD patterns of perovskite crystals on FTO/NaCl-doped SnO2 substrates.
XRD patterns of perovskite crystals on FTO/NaCl-doped SnO2 substrates.The magnified XRD pattern from
12° to 14.5° is further
depicted in Figure to investigate the relation between NaCl and perovskite crystal
growth. The peak at 12.67° was from nonreacted PbI2 (001), while the peak of the CsFA1–PbI3 (001) plane was
located at 13.98°. The measured peak was fitted by a Gaussian
function and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) was calculated
subsequently. The determined FWHM was then deployed into the Scherrer
equation to obtain the crystal grain size. The Scherrer equation is
a practical way to determine the crystal grain size in a specific
direction, which can be written as Dhkl = 0.9λ/βhklcos(θ). Dhkl is the grain size in the (hkl) direction in nm, λ
is the wavelength of incident X-ray, which is 0.15 nm for Cu Kα.
θ is the Bragg angle of the crystal in degree, and βhkl is the calculated FWHM in radian. The resulting FWHMs and
calculated grain sizes of PbI2 (001) and CsFA1–PbI3 (001) are summarized in Table . Both PbI2 and CsFA1–PbI3 crystals
became larger along with the increasing NaCl doping amount in the
SnO2 film. The possible mechanism is some portion of NaCl
blended with SnO2 would locate on the surface of the as-spun
SnO2 film, being able to dissolve into the perovskite precursor
solution during the following spinning process. The dissolved NaCl
was considered to interact with PbI2in the solvent. PbI2is a quasi-two-dimensional semiconductor. A layer of Pb atoms
is sandwiched between two layers of I atoms. This I-Pb-I structure
is then repeated to form the basic configuration of PbI2. These I-Pb-I repeating units are combined through van der Waals
interactions, which are relatively weak in contrast to the covalent
interactions in the intralayers.[50] NaCl
dissolved inperovskite solution could insert into I-Pb-I layers,
producing NaCl–PbI2intermediates.[51] These stable intermediates would retard the reaction between
FAI and PbI2 and the amount of precipitated perovskite
crystal, which was referred to as nuclei, from the FAI-DMSO-PbI2 precursor solution before annealing would drop. The less
the existence of nuclei, the larger the final crystal dimension. Hence,
the increasing perovskite crystal size accompanied by the more NaCl
doping concentrations inSnO2 was due to the increased
formation of the NaCl–PbI2intermediate.
Figure 11
Magnified
XRD patterns of perovskite crystals on FTO/NaCl-doped
SnO2 substrates.
Table 4
FWHM and the Corresponding Crystal
Size of PbI2 (001) and CsFA1–PbI3 (001) on Different
FTO/NaCl-Doped SnO2 Substrates
ETL
FWHM (radian)
crystal size
(nm)
FWHM (radian)
crystal size
(nm)
PbI2
PbI2
perovskite
perovskite
N-0
0.00366
39
0.00401
35
N-25
0.00349
40
0.00366
40
N-50
0.00262
56
0.00332
43
N-100
0.00244
60
0.00297
47
Magnified
XRD patterns of perovskite crystals on FTO/NaCl-dopedSnO2 substrates.Figure shows
the SEM images of the perovskite layer on different NaCl-doped SnO2 substrates. The polygon shapes of 500–1000 nm in diameter
were recognized as the perovskite crystal and were quite similar to
the research reported by Prathapani et al.[49] A large perovskite crystal size is preferred for two reasons: grain
boundaries will serve as charge recombination centers. A large crystal
size can reduce the amount of grain boundary per volume, so the problematic
charge recombination can be suppressed and Voc and FF of the solar cell can be augmented.[10,52] In terms of the charge transfer process, a large perovskite crystal
is more likely to provide a long-range travel distance for photoinduced
charges, which can also promote the device performance.[53] The large crystal size here was superb for high
efficiency perovskite solar cells. In Figure a, perovskite formed on the SnO2 ETL without NaCl modification showed apparently obvious cracks between
crystals. By contrast, perovskite on N-25 ETL (Figure b) showed an exceedingly dense layer. For
the perovskite layer on N-50 and N-100 ETL (Figure c,d), a rough surface was produced. This
rough surface would raise the charge recombination centers, which
was a disadvantage for cell performance. However, the perovskite crystal
on 25 mM NaCl-doped SnO2 became more homogeneous than undoped
SnO2. This indicated that 25 mM NaCl doping treatment could
optimize the perovskite morphology so as to obtain full-coverage and
a uniform perovskite film compared to undoped SnO2, which
is beneficial for the light absorption and charge transport. For high-performance
solar cells, a homogeneous perovskite film with well surface coverage
is highly desirable because cracks or pinholes could cause a direct
contact between the ETL and the HTL, resulting in a shunting pathway.
In this respect, the compact film produced from the 25 mM NaCl-dopedSnO2 ETL led to a better high-performance perovskite solar
cell.
Figure 12
SEM perovskite layer images of (a) N-0; (b) N-25; (c) N-50; and
(d) N-100 films.
SEM perovskite layer images of (a) N-0; (b) N-25; (c) N-50; and
(d) N-100 films.The analysis of photoluminescence
decay in time-resolved photoluminescence
(TRPL) spectroscopy was therefore an effective way to determine the
recombination kinetics of NaCl-doped SnO2/CsFAPbI3 perovskite (Figure ). The perovskite layer was illuminated by a laser pulse from the
perovskite side with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm and photogenerated
electron hole pairs emerged in the perovskite layer. The photogenerated
electrons then diminished through different processes. Hence, the
existing electrons being able to recombine with electric holes in
the perovskite layer, which could generate light detected by the TRPL
equipment, reduced. The PL decay curve was then fitted with a biexponential
function, consisting of two terms: a quick decay (τ1) and a
slow decay (τ2), respectively (Table ).[32] The quick
decay (τ1) is attributed to the charge extraction by the ETL,
while the slow decay (τ2) to the recombination process inside
the perovskite film.[32] The decrease of
quick decay lifetime τ1 from 10.39 ns (SnO2) to 8.91
ns (25 mM NaCl-doped SnO2) and the increase of the proportion
of τ1 from 0.57 (SnO2) to 0.59 (25 mM NaCl-dopedSnO2) indicate electron transfer from perovskite to the
ETL more quickly with 25 mM of NaCl addition. The slightly slow decay
lifetime τ2 increase from 51.57 to 55.33 ns for the perovskite
film on the 25 mM NaCl-doped SnO2ETLindicates a slightly
lower nonradiative recombination rate inside the perovskite film.
The reduced recombination could be attributed to the passivation of
perovskite grain by Na+ and Cl– ions.
However, there is no large difference on the PL lifetime between pure
SnO2 and 25 mM NaCl-doped SnO2.
Figure 13
TRPL spectra of FTO/NaCl-doped
SnO2/perovskite with
different concentrations of NaCl-modified SnO2 as substrates.
Table 5
Fast and Slow Components for the PL
Decay and Their Corresponding Proportions
ETL
N-0
N-25
N-50
N-100
A1
0.57
0.59
0.74
0.48
τ1 (ns)
10.39
8.91
6.37
11.26
A2
0.43
0.41
0.26
0.52
τ2 (ns)
51.57
55.33
44.33
65.29
TRPL spectra of FTO/NaCl-dopedSnO2/perovskite with
different concentrations of NaCl-modified SnO2 as substrates.
Conclusions
In summary,
a sodium chloride (NaCl) modification had demonstrated
that the NaCl-doped SnO2 composite ETL will effectively
improve the planar perovskite solar cell performance. The NaCl of
the composite ETL contributes to interface passivation and reduces
the nonradiative recombination inperovskite photovoltaics. The NaCl
modification to SnO2 had reached a great success inincreasing
the conductivity of the SnO2 ETL and reducing the defect
density in the perovskite layer, hence promoting the electron transfer
efficiency from the perovskite layer to ETL and the PCE of the SnO2-based planar perovskite solar cell. The NaCl-doped SnO2 composite ETLperovskite solar cells have demonstrated a
best PCE performance of 20.7% with effective improvement in the FF.
This facile sodium chloride modification strategy to the tin oxideETL could provide an uncomplicated approach for fabricating perovskite
photovoltaics with significant performance improvements.
Experimental Section
Materials and Device Fabrication
The NaCl-doped SnO2 composite ETL was fabricated by
mixing
NaClin the SnO2 colloidal solution and then deposited
on a FTO conductive glass substrate. The perovskite material with
a composition of Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 was
prepared by applying the antisolvent deposition method.[4]The patterned FTO glass (10 Ω/□,
Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd., Japan) was cleaned with acetone and
ethanol, respectively, and dried with N2 gas flow. UV-Ozone
(ASM1101N; Asumi Giken Co., Ltd., Japan) cleaning is then applied
for 15 min to remove the organic particles and to enhance the wettability
of the patterned FTO surface. The ETL precursor solution is prepared
in advance. SnO2 ETL solution (tin(IV) oxide, 15% inH2O colloidal dispersion liquid; Alfa Aesar Co., Ltd., USA)
contains 2.5 wt % of SnO2 colloid water solution with 0/25/50/100
mM NaCl (Sodium Chloride >99.5%; Sigma Aldrich Co., Ltd., USA)
doping
concentrations. The prepared ETL solution (85 μL) is then spin
coated (MS-B100; Mikasa Co., Ltd., Japan) on the patterned FTO substrate
at 4000 rpm for 30 s. The as-spun ETLis subsequently annealed at
60 °C for 30 min and cooled to room temperature for the following
procedure.CsI (0.14 M) (cesiumiodide >99.0%; TCI Co., Ltd.,
Japan), FAI
(1.26 M) (formamidine hydroiodide > 98%; TCI Co., Ltd., Japan),
PbI2 (1.4 M) (Lead(II) iodide 99.9%; TCI Co., Ltd., Japan)
are
dissolved in a 4:1 (v:v) mixture of N,N-dimethylformamide
and dimethyl sulfoxide (super-dehydrated; Fujifilm Co., Ltd., Japan)
to form perovskite precursor solution. The precursor solution is rested
for another 30 min to make sure the solutes are completely dissolved.
The as-prepared perovskite precursor solution (100 μL) is spin
coated onto the ETL through a process (1000 rpm for 10 s then 4000
rpm for 30 s) with dripping of chlorobenzene (600 μL) as the
antisolvent at the last 10 s. The deposited perovskite layer is then
immediately transferred to the hot plate to anneal at 155 °C
for exact 15 min.The HTL precursor solution needs to be prepared
in a specific sequence
to avoid the presence of undissolved lithium. 1 mL of Spiro-MeOTAD
(SHT-263 Solarpur; Sigma Aldrich Co., Ltd., USA) solution containing
72.3 mg of Spiro-MeOTAD powder in 1 mL of chlorobenzene (Chlorobenzene
anhydrous 99.8%; Sigma Aldrich Co., Ltd., USA) is mixed with 17.5
μL of Li-TFSI solution (520 mg of Li-TFSIin 1 mL of acetonitrile)
(Li-TFSI; bis(trifluoromethane) sulfonamide lithium salt 99.95%; Sigma
Aldrich Co., Ltd., USA) (acetonitrile, super-dehydrated; Fujifilm
Co., Ltd., Japan). This intermediate solution is then added with 28.75
μL of 4-tert-butylpyridine (>96%; TCI Co.,
Ltd., Japan). The HTL solution is spin coated on a perovskite layer
at 4000 rpm for 30 s and then an 80 nm-thick gold electrode is deposited
on the HTL using a thermal coater. Oxidization of HTL is implemented
in the dry room with humidity under 500 ppm one day for aging.
Device Characterization
The photocurrent–density–voltage
(J–V) characteristics of
the cells were measured under AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW cm–2) with a 450 W xenon light source (YSS-80A; Yamashita
Denso Co., Ltd., Japan). The light source was calibrated using a Si
photodiode (BS-520, Bunkoukeiki Co., Ltd., Japan) with an optical
filter (KG5, Bunkoukeiki Co., Ltd., Japan). The scanning speed was
fixed at 50 mVs–1. Spectra of the incident-photon-to-electron
conversion efficiency (IPCE) of the cells were measured using a solar
simulator (CEP-2000MLQ, Bunkoukeiki Co., Ltd., Japan) in the direct
current mode without bias. The excitation light intensity was calibrated
using a Si photodiode. A metal-aperture mask was used to define an
active area of 0.18 cm2 during the J–V and IPCE measurements. Transmittance of the NaCl-dopedSnO2 film coated on the FTO glass was obtained using an
ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectrometer (UV3600, Shimadzu,
Japan) equipped with an integrating sphere. The surface morphology
and thickness of each film were analyzed with a field-emission SEM
(SU8000, Hitachi, Japan). XRD patterns of the SnO2 and
perovskite films were measured using a X-ray diffractometer (D8 Discover,
Bruker, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm).
DLS (Delsa NanoC, DLS, Beckman Coulter, USA) was implemented to measure
the particle size of the SnO2 colloid solution when different
amounts of NaCl was doped, since the attachment of NaCl on SnO2 particles may affect its dispersion in the solvent. TRPL
was conducted using a microphotoluminescence system. TRPL spectra
can demonstrate the exact electron loss mechanism through the biexponential
fitting of the measured TRPL decay spectra.
Authors: Nam Joong Jeon; Jun Hong Noh; Woon Seok Yang; Young Chan Kim; Seungchan Ryu; Jangwon Seo; Sang Il Seok Journal: Nature Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi; Zahra Andaji-Garmaroudi; Stefania Cacovich; Camille Stavrakas; Bertrand Philippe; Johannes M Richter; Mejd Alsari; Edward P Booker; Eline M Hutter; Andrew J Pearson; Samuele Lilliu; Tom J Savenije; Håkan Rensmo; Giorgio Divitini; Caterina Ducati; Richard H Friend; Samuel D Stranks Journal: Nature Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 49.962