Literature DB >> 34307992

N-Acetylcysteine Interference With Creatinine Measurement: An In Vitro Analysis.

Christopher McCudden1,2, Edward G Clark3,4, Ayub Akbari3,4, Jennifer Kong4, Salmaan Kanji5,6, Swapnil Hiremath3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34307992      PMCID: PMC8258456          DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Rep        ISSN: 2468-0249


× No keyword cloud information.
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a derivative of the cysteine amino acid, and was introduced in the 1960s primarily as a mucolytic, for which it is still used orally as well as in a nebulized form. It also can serve as a substrate for glutathione synthesis, which has an antioxidant property, and is depleted in states such as acetaminophen (or paracetamol) intoxication. Hence, NAC is used as an antidote in the intravenous form in this setting, as well as increasingly also in severe alcoholic hepatitis, with some evidence of benefit. In addition, it became popular to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) until it was finally shown to be not beneficial in a large definitive trial. However, the data on NAC and prevention of AKI in this and other settings, such as perioperative AKI, is decidedly mixed and a clear explanation for this heterogeneity has not yet been conclusively reported. One possible explanation for the discrepancy in outcomes with NAC in the AKI literature could be related to the measurement of creatinine, since notably in the CI-AKI trials, the benefit was mostly seen in trials with a change in creatinine as an outcome, and not in clinical outcomes such as need for dialysis or death. Serum creatinine can be measured in different ways. The 2 commonly used methods to measure creatinine level are the modified Jaffe colorimetric assay and the enzymatic method., The enzymatic method is regarded as more of an accurate method for staging chronic kidney disease and less susceptible to interference when compared with the Jaffe method. However, uncertainty remains because both methods have not been performed in the same subjects, and most studies are in healthy humans, and any effect of NAC at higher level of creatinine or in patients with chronic kidney disease is not clearly known. With the hypothesis that the method of measuring creatinine may influence the interference of NAC on creatinine measurement, we conducted this in vitro study by adding specific concentration of NAC to blood samples with known different levels of creatinine and measuring creatinine again with different methods, as well as measuring other markers of kidney function.

Results

A total of 24 samples of waste blood plasma were used for analysis. Creatinine pools were divided into 3 levels: low, 50 μmol/l (n = 8); medium, 100 μmol/l (n = 8); high, 200 μmol/l (n = 8) (Table 1). Similar pools were created for cystatin-C (1, 2, 5 mg/l concentrations), and beta-trace protein (1, 2, 5 mg/l concentrations). Specific amount of NAC was then added to each sample to achieve low to high concentrations of NAC, ranging from 0 to 2000 μg/ml (see Table 1 for details).
Table 1

Detailed sample preparation procedure

Sample IDCreatininePoolEDTA BufferAdd (μl)Creatinine Pool (μl)2 mg/ml Stock NAC Add (μl)20 mg/ml Stock NAC Add (μl)NAC Final Concentration (μg/ml)Creatinine Expected (μmol/l)
1Low1009000050
2Low87.590012.52550
3Low75900255050
4Low509005010050
5Low909001020050
6Low759002550050
7Low5090050100050
8Low0900100200050
9Medium10090000100
10Medium87.590012.525100
11Medium759002550100
12Medium5090050100100
13Medium9090010200100
14Medium7590025500100
15Medium50900501000100
16Medium09001002000100
17High10090000200
18High87.590012.525200
19High759002550200
20High5090050100200
21High9090010200200
22High7590025500200
23High50900501000200
24High09001002000200

NAC, N-acetylcysteine.

Add 900 μl of creatinine pool for total volume of 1000 μl for each sample

Detailed sample preparation procedure NAC, N-acetylcysteine. Add 900 μl of creatinine pool for total volume of 1000 μl for each sample Addition of NAC had a dose-dependent effect on creatinine as measured by the enzymatic assay, with a decrease in measured creatinine at the highest NAC concentration ranging from –15 μmol/l in the low creatinine pool (i.e., creatinine being measured at 35 instead of 50 μmol/l) and 60 μmol/l (from 200 to 140 μmol/l) for the high creatinine pool. The negative bias was greater than 10% at NAC concentration of ≥ 400 μg/ml (see interferogram Figure 1a and b). This effect was consistent across all creatinine concentrations tested (50, 100, 200 μmol/l). Unlike the enzymatic assay, the Jaffe creatinine method was unaffected by NAC addition (Supplementary Figure S1).
Figure 1

Effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on enzymatic creatinine. (a) Effect of N-acetylcysteine on the absolute concentration of the Siemens enzymatic creatinine. (b). Recovery of Siemens enzymatic with NAC.

Effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on enzymatic creatinine. (a) Effect of N-acetylcysteine on the absolute concentration of the Siemens enzymatic creatinine. (b). Recovery of Siemens enzymatic with NAC. Similarly, there was no effect of NAC addition at any concentration of NAC for measurement of beta-trace protein (Supplementary Figure S2) or cystatin-C (Supplementary Figure S3).

Discussion

In this in vitro study, we demonstrated that addition of NAC interferes with, and lowers, plasma creatinine as measured only by the enzymatic assay, and not the Jaffe method. There is no interference with cystatin-C or beta-trace protein. This interference is dose-dependent, and is greater than 10% at NAC concentrations >400 μg/l. The interference was not dependent on the baseline serum creatinine level of the sample, and was similar at low or high levels. The results are also significant because of ongoing use of NAC in other settings and in clinical research. Clinical registries still report ongoing trials on NAC with kidney outcomes and it would be important for these researchers to be aware of this interference in case serum creatinine is one of the outcomes of interest. In addition, NAC, by intravenous route, and at doses that would achieve high serum concentration (typically 150 mg/kg) are used in acetaminophen overdose and fulminant hepatitis. These patients are critically ill, and may develop AKI, with the assay interference potentially delaying the recognition of AKI. NAC has a relatively short half-life of 5.6 hours in adults and it is excreted renally.S1 The concentration of NAC needed to result in a significant interaction was very high at approximately 400 μg/ml NAC concentration, which would correspond to approximately 65 μmol/l. In a pharmacokinetic study, intravenous 25 mg/kg NAC (i.e., 6 times lower than the 150 mg/kg dose used in acetaminophen intoxication) resulted in a concentration of >180 μmol/l, suggesting that the interference we describe would be quite clinically relevant. NAC has been used for prevention of AKI primarily in the contrast use setting, but also in the setting of postoperative AKI, and in chronic kidney disease. For CI-AKI, NAC use has fallen appropriately in disfavor once large trials reporting clinical outcomes did not report a benefit., A nephroprotective agent should prevent a rise in creatinine, but the initial small NAC trials reported a fall in creatinine, which does not make physiological sense. However, if NAC lowers serum creatinine by assay interference, as is demonstrated in the present study, this would clearly explain the conflicting results from the CI-AKI and NAC literature very well. The other small body of literature in this area has tried to demonstrate the NAC effect by administering it to healthy adults, or those without any other exposure to AKI, and measuring creatinine before and after. In a systematic review, we demonstrated that this could be resolved, and the studies using the Jaffe method (−0.51 μmol/l, 95% confidence interval: −7.56 to 6.53) did not show a decrease in creatinine compared with the studies using the enzymatic assay (−3.24 μmol/l, 95% confidence interval: −6.29 to −0.28).S2 The present study extends these results by clearly demonstrating that the explanation lies in the concentration-dependent interference of NAC with the enzymatic assay. Indeed, from the previous systematic review, the greatest decrease in creatinine was reported with intravenous and high-dose NAC, which would achieve the high concentrations needed for significant artifactual reduction in creatinine. These findings are further supported by studies of interference mechanisms showing the Trinder reaction (bonding of 4-aminophenazone and a phenol derivative with H2O2 in the presence of peroxidase) is susceptible to inhibition by NAC in dose-dependent fashion.S3 Based on the results of this study, very high concentrations (>400 μg/ml) of NAC result in a significant negative bias (>10%) for enzymatic method for measurement of creatinine. There is no interference seen with the Jaffe method, nor with other kidney function measures such as cystatin-C and beta-trace protein. This information provides a satisfactory closure to the hitherto unexplained heterogeneity in the NAC and CI-AKI literature, and is also an important aspect to consider for ongoing NAC research and use in other settings.

Disclosure

All the authors declared no competing interests.
  9 in total

1.  The Jaffé reaction. Identification of the coloured species.

Authors:  A R Butler
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1975-03-10       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Glucocorticoids plus N-acetylcysteine in severe alcoholic hepatitis.

Authors:  Eric Nguyen-Khac; Thierry Thevenot; Marie-Astrid Piquet; Saïd Benferhat; Odile Goria; Denis Chatelain; Blaise Tramier; François Dewaele; Salah Ghrib; Marika Rudler; Nicolas Carbonell; Hervé Tossou; Abdeslam Bental; Brigitte Bernard-Chabert; Jean-Louis Dupas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Effects of drugs on mucus glycoproteins and water in bronchial secretion.

Authors:  T C Medici; P Radielovic
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 4.  What is the most appropriate dose of N-acetylcysteine after massive acetaminophen overdose?

Authors:  Robert G Hendrickson
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.467

5.  Acetylcysteine for prevention of renal outcomes in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral vascular angiography: main results from the randomized Acetylcysteine for Contrast-induced nephropathy Trial (ACT).

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Mechanism of interference with the Jaffé reaction for creatinine.

Authors:  M H Kroll; N A Roach; B Poe; R J Elin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Improvement by acetylcysteine of hemodynamics and oxygen transport in fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  P M Harrison; J A Wendon; A E Gimson; G J Alexander; R Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Outcomes after Angiography with Sodium Bicarbonate and Acetylcysteine.

Authors:  Steven D Weisbord; Martin Gallagher; Hani Jneid; Santiago Garcia; Alan Cass; Soe-Soe Thwin; Todd A Conner; Glenn M Chertow; Deepak L Bhatt; Kendrick Shunk; Chirag R Parikh; Edward O McFalls; Mary Brophy; Ryan Ferguson; Hongsheng Wu; Maria Androsenko; John Myles; James Kaufman; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 176.079

9.  Falsely Elevated Serum Creatinine Associated With IgM Paraproteinemia.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Mase; Naoto Hamano; Ryoko Mizuhara; Tsukasa Nozaki; Takayuki Saso; Takehiko Wada; Satomi Asai; Hayato Miyachi; Masafumi Fukagawa
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2019-12-07
  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Mediators of Regional Kidney Perfusion during Surgical Pneumo-Peritoneum Creation and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury-A Review of Basic Physiology.

Authors:  Csaba Kopitkó; László Medve; Tibor Gondos; Karim Magdy Mohamed Soliman; Tibor Fülöp
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Meta-analytic Techniques to Assess the Association Between N-acetylcysteine and Acute Kidney Injury After Contrast Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kate Magner; Julius Vladimir Ilin; Edward G Clark; Jennifer W Y Kong; Alexandra Davis; Swapnil Hiremath
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.