Literature DB >> 34307886

Molecular record for the first authentication of Isaria cicadae from Vietnam.

Thuan Duc Lao1, Hanh Van Trinh2, Loi Vuong2,3, Luyen Tien Vu1, Thuy Ai Huyen Le1, Hiep Minh Dinh4, Nguyen Binh Truong5.   

Abstract

The entomopathogenic fungus T011, parasitizing on nymph of Cicada, collected in the coffee garden in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam, was preliminarily morphologically identified as Isaria cicadae, belonged to order Hypocreales and family Clavicipitaceae. To ensure the authenticity of T011, phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated set of multiple genes including ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 was applied to support the identification. Genomic DNA was isolated from dried sample T011. The PCR assay sequencing was applied to amplify ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 gene. For phylogenetic analysis, the concatenated data of both target gens were constructed with MEGAX with a 1,000 replicate bootstrap based on the neighbor-joining, maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony method. As the result, the concatenated data containing 62 sequences belonged to order Hypocreales, families Clavicipitaceae, and 2 outgroup sequences belonged to order Hypocreales, genus Verticillium. The phylogenetic analysis results indicated that T011 was accepted at subclade Cordyceps and significantly formed the monophyletic group with referent Cordyceps cicadae (Telemorph of Isaria cicadae) with high bootstrap value. The phylogenetically analyzed result was strongly supported by our morphological analysis described as the Isaria cicadae. In summary, phylogenetic analyses based on the concatenated dataset were successfully applied to strengthen the identification of T011 as Isaria cicadae.
© 2021 Thuan Duc Lao et al., published by De Gruyter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isaria cicadae; nuclear large ribosomal subunit; nuclear small ribosomal subunit; phylogeny

Year:  2021        PMID: 34307886      PMCID: PMC8284333          DOI: 10.1515/biol-2021-0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Life Sci        ISSN: 2391-5412            Impact factor:   0.938


Introduction

Isaria cicadae Miq., Bull. Sci. phys. nat. néerl.: 86 (1838) (Mycobank: MB#204858), also known Cordyceps cicadae (Miq.) Massee (1895) (Mycobank: MB#311793), is the entomopathogenic fungi capable of parasitizing on cicada nymph, belongs to the order Hypocreales, and the family Clavicipitaceae [4,5]. C. cicadae usually distribute in many regions of the world with temperatures ranging from 18 to 24°C, relative humidity of >80°C, and grows vertically on the sunny slopes at an attitude of 700–950 m [3]. The distribution of C. cicadae is recorded in China (Province of Yunan, Sichuan, Guizhou, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Hunan, Hubei, etc.), Korea (Jeju Island), and Japan (South of Fukushima). Furthermore, C. cicadae is also seen in Thailand, North America, and Europe [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Due to their numerous bioactivities, I. cicadae, as well as C. cicadae, is considered the most valued traditional Chinese medicine. Its medicinal bioactive components, such as adenosine, cordycepin, ergosterol, etc., which have been used to relieve exhaustion remedy, treat numerous diseases, such as antitumor activities, and food source, have been recorded [3,19,20,21,22]. To obtain precious valued herbal medicine, the exploration and collection of local I. cicadae (C. cicadae) play an important role to apply for further medicinal applications. During our expedition to validate the fungal diversity in Ea Knop Town – Ea Kar District (Latitude: 12°34′26″N–13°02′09″N; Longitude: 108°22′08″E–108°43′2″E) located in Dak Lak Province, we collected the sample T011, parasitizing on the nymph of Cicada, which was classified and confirmed by the specialist on the entomologist, Faculty of Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. In this paper, to ensure the origin and authenticity of T011 as I. cicadae, we conducted the morphology analysis and molecular phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated set genes including ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

The specimen T011, parasitizing on the nymph of Cicada, was collected in the coffee garden in Ea Knop Town – Ea Kar District, Dak Lak Province on the morning of June 24, 2018. In the laboratory, the specimen was conditioned to be dried at 60°C and stored for further analysis.

Morphology analysis

Macroscopic characteristics of the fresh body were carefully observed in the many macroscopic characteristics. For the microscopic analysis, a bunch of conidiogenous cells was cut into small species, then, soaked in the water for about 3 min. A sample of the synemata containing the conidiogenous cells was immersed in distilled water for 3 min. Asexual spores were removed using a clean brush. The fertile part was then analyzed under a microscope. Conidia size was recorded. According to the identification of conidia, phialides, and colony coloration, the isolate cultures were grown on YMG media, composed of 4 g/L Yeast extract, 10 g/L Malt extract, 4 g/L Glucose, incubated at 20°C within a period of 20 days.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, target gene sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from dried material by using the phenol/chloroform method (pH = 8). The dried material was added to a lysis buffer (2.0% SDS, Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1 mg/mL Proteinase K). During the incubation at 65°C for overnight, it was mixed thoroughly by inverting the tube several times. Then, the supernatant was collected by centrifugation. About 700 μL of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol at a ratio of 25:24:1 was added and centrifuged. The upper solution was collected, precipitated with absolute ethanol, and washed with 70% ethanol. DNA concentration was identified by using OD260. Finally, isolated genomic DNA was stored in Tris-EDTA buffer at −20°C for further studies. The primer pairs used to amplify ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 region were shown in Table 1. The final volume for PCR was done in the total of 15 μL with the thermal program: 1 cycle for 95°C for 5 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, X°C for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min; 1 cycle for 72°C for 5 min (Note: X°C is the annealing temperatures for each target gene, shown in Table 1). About 5 μL aliquots of amplification products were electrophoresed on a 2.0% agarose gel and visualized in a UV transilluminator. The amplified product was sequenced at Nam Khoa (Vietnam) company.
Table 1

The primers’ sequences used in this study

Target genePrimerSequence (5′–3′) T a (°C)Reference
nrLSU LR0R (F)GTACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC55[18]
LR5 (R)ATCCTGAGGGAAACTTC
nrSSU NS1 (F)GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC42.2[20]
NS4 (R)CTTCCGTCAATTCCTTTAAG
ITS ITS1FCTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA55[20]
ITS4TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
Rpb1 CRPB1CCWGGYTTYATCAAGAARGT46.3[13]
RPB1CrCCNGCDATNTCRTTRTCCATRTA
Tef1 983FGCYCCYGGHCAYCGTGAYTTYAT55[2]
2218RATGACACCRACRGCRACRGTYTG

Note: F: forward primer; R: reverse primer; T a: annealing temperature.

The primers’ sequences used in this study Note: F: forward primer; R: reverse primer; T a: annealing temperature.

Taxa and ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 sequences collection, DNA proofreading, and phylogeny analysis

The data set of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 sequences were established by sequences downloaded from Genbank (NCBI) and based on the previous data published by Sung et al. (2007) [16]. The ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 were noted with accession number, name of taxon, and locality. The multiple gene data used in the current study were established based on the combination of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 data. The amplified DNA sequences were proofread to remove ambiguous signals at both ends by different software, including Seaview 4.2.12 and Chromas Lite 2.1.1. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum parsimony (MP), and maximum likelihood (ML) by using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) version X. Additionally, the best evolution model was predicted by using jModelTest.

Results

The sample of T011 was collected in the soil of the coffee garden on the morning of June 24, 2018. The synnemata were emerging from the soil, while the host was in the soil. Host: unidentified cicada nymph. Synnemata: presence, branching, 15–60 mm in length × 1.0–2.5 mm in diameter. Synnemata originated from the head of cicada nymphs with the thick layer of mycelia (hiding under the ground). Color: white to cream. Form: simple, erect, and distinguishing form fertile part and stipe. Fertile part: a dense white powdery covering on the surface due to the presence of a mass of conidia. Phialides: grouped inside the fertile part. Conidia: hyaline to white, cylindrical, 4.7–6.5 µm in length × 2.6–3.1 µm in diameter. Colonies from cultures on PDA: floccose and white, then becoming powdery by the conidiation of aerial hyphae. Conidia from the mycelia: smaller than those of from synnemata (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Morphology of Isaria cicadae: (a) Synemata forming from Cicadae, (b) Phialides, (c) conidia, (d) mycelia after 30 days on PDA media, (e) chain of conidia, and (f) conidia from mycelia. The bar scale indicated 10 µm.

Morphology of Isaria cicadae: (a) Synemata forming from Cicadae, (b) Phialides, (c) conidia, (d) mycelia after 30 days on PDA media, (e) chain of conidia, and (f) conidia from mycelia. The bar scale indicated 10 µm.

Amplification of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 gene

Isolated genomic DNA was amplified with the described primers; then, electrophoresis on 2.0% agarose gel showed a significant and clear band of gene ITS: 700 bps, nrLSU: 950 bps, nrSSU: 1,102 bps, Rpb1: 803 bps, and Tef1: 1,020 bps. The PCR product was sequenced. Sequencing signals of both strands of both target genes were unique and good for reading (data not shown). According to BLAST results, the ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 of T011 were similar to ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 of C. cicadae (Telemorph of I. cicadae) (Table 2).
Table 2

BLAST results of T011 specimen’s ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1

Target geneBLAST descriptionTotal scorePer. Ident. E-valueAccession
nrLSU-F Cordyceps cicadae 1,509100.000.0MH879588
nrLSU-R Cordyceps cicadae 1,50999.640.0MH879588
nrSSU-F Cordyceps cicadae 1,109100.000.0MH879636
nrSSU-R Cordyceps cicadae 1,04899.650.0MH879636
ITS-F Cordyceps cicadae 1,00099.820.0MT555324
ITS-R Cordyceps cicadae 1,44499.820.0MN128643
Tef1-F Cordyceps cicadae 1,72999.170.0MH879662
Tef1-R Cordyceps cicadae 1,67698.330.0MN576985
Rpb1-F Cordyceps cicadae 1,247100.000.0MN913552
Rpb1-F Cordyceps cicadae 1,28099.570.0MN576876

Note: F: forward sequence; R: reverse sequence; Per. Ident.: percentage of identity.

BLAST results of T011 specimen’s ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 Note: F: forward sequence; R: reverse sequence; Per. Ident.: percentage of identity.

The systematic concatenated ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 dataset and phylogeny analysis

Total of 62 sequences of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 belonged to order Hypocreales, families Clavicipitaceae (served as referent data), and 2 sequences belonged to order Hypocreales, genus Verticillium (served as outgroup) were collected from Genbank and listed in Table 3 and T011 sequence. According to 62 sequences, they were divided into three families (Cordycipitaceae, Clavicipitaceae, Ophiocordycipitaceae), and each family was also divided intro genus, including Cordycipitaceae (genus: Cordyceps, Beauveria, Simplicillium, Lecanicillium), Clavicipitaceae (genus: Claviceps, Balansia, Pochonia, Conoideocrella, Metapochonia, Metarhizium), and Ophiocordycipitaceae (genus: Drechmeria, Ophiocordyceps). The best-fit model of DNA evolution for the analyses was obtained using the jModelTest2. Results are shown from General Time Reversible and Gramma distributed with invariant Sites (G + I) with the following parameters: parameters = 109, BIC = 42628.811, lnL = −20671.999, (+I) = 0.450, (+G) = 0.466, R = 2.186, f(A) = 0.246, f(T) = 0.221, f(G) = 0.257, f(C) = 0.276, r(AT) = 0.030, r(AC) = 0.040, r(AG) = 0.110, r(TA) = 0.030, r(TC) = 0.260, r(TG) = 0.040, r(CA) = 0.040, r(CT) = 0.220, r(CG) = 0.050, r(GA) = 0.100, r(GT) = 0.330, and r(GC) = 0.040. This model was used to construct phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood from concatenated data set. Phylogenetic analysis was presented in Figure 2. As the results, the Clavicipitaceae formed a strong monophyletic group and separated from the out group. All the species in our dataset formed threes clades that were previously reported. According to T011, the T011 multiple gene sequences (ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1) formed a group with referent sequences of C. cicadae, Cordyceps sp., and Isaria sp., belonged to the clade Clavicipitaceae, subclade Cordyceps, with the high supported bootstrap values: 100, 100, 100 for NJ, MP, ML method (Figure 2, blanket). Therefore, the molecular identification indicated that T011 was identified as I. cicadae (anamorph of C. cicadae).
Table 3

The concatenated dataset of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 genes used for the construction of phylogenetic trees

No.TaxonGenusAccession
nrLSU nrSSU Rbp1 Tef1 ITS
1 Balansia pilulaeformis Balansia AF543788AF543764DQ522365DQ522319JN049816
2 Beauveria caledonica Beauveria AF339520AF339570EF469086EF469057HQ880817
3 Beauveria scarabaeidicola Beauveria AF339524AF339574DQ522380DQ522335JN049827
4 Beauveria staphylinidicola Beauveria EF468836EF468981EF468881EF468776
5 Claviceps fusiformis Claviceps U17402DQ522539DQ522366DQ522320JN049817
6 Claviceps paspali Claviceps U47826U32401DQ522367DQ522321JN049818
7 Claviceps purpurea Claviceps AF543789AF543765AY489648AF543778KJ529004
8 Claviceps purpurea Claviceps EF469075EF469122EF469087EF469058KX977396
9 Conoideocrella luteorostrata Conoideocrella EF468850EF468995EF468906EF468801JN049859
10 Conoideocrella luteorostrata Conoideocrella EF468849EF468994EF468905EF468800JN049860
11 Cordyceps cardinalis Cordyceps sp.AY184963AY184974EF469088EF469059
12 Cordyceps cf. pruinosa Cordyceps EF468820EF468965EF468868EF468760
13 Cordyceps cf. pruinosa Cordyceps EF468821EF468966EF468869EF468762
14 Cordyceps cf. pruinosa Cordyceps EF468823EF468968EF468871EF468761
15 Cordyceps cicadae Cordyceps MH879588MH879636MH885438MH879662MF803085
16 Cordyceps kyusyuensis Cordyceps EF468813EF468960EF468863EF468754EF368021
17 Cordyceps militaris Cordyceps AY184966AY184977DQ522377DQ522332JN049825
18 Cordyceps pruinosa Cordyceps AY184968AY184979DQ522397DQ522351JN049826
19 Cordyceps sp.MT239107MT268242 MT268246MT192488
20 Drechmeria balanoides Drechmeria AF339539AF339588DQ522388DQ522342EF546660
21 Drechmeria zeospora Drechmeria AF339589EF469091EF469062
22 Isaria sp.MT239106MT268241 MT268245 MT192487
23 Isaria sp.MT555409 MT637810MT555325
24 Lecanicillium antillanum Lecanicillium AF339536AF339585DQ522396DQ522350MH861888
25 Lecanicillium fusisporum Lecanicillium AF339549AF339598EF468889EF468783MH859538
26 Lecanicillium psalliotae Lecanicillium AF339559AF339608EF468890EF468784N049846
27 Lecanicillium tenuipes Lecanicillium AF339526AF339576DQ522387DQ522341JN036556
28 Metarhizium guizhouense Metarhizium AF543787AF543763DQ522383AF543775JN049829
29 Pochonia chlamydosporia Pochonia DQ518758DQ522544DQ522372DQ522327JN049821
30 Metapochonia bulbillosa Metapochonia AF339542AF339591EF468902EF468796EU999952
31 Metapochonia rubescens Metapochonia AF339566AF339615EF468903EF468797MH862138
32 Metarhizium anisopliae Metarhizium AF339530AF339579DQ522399AF543774JN049834
33 Metarhizium carneum Metarhizium EF468842EF468989EF468895EF468788AY624170
34 Metarhizium carneum Metarhizium EF468843EF468988EF468894EF468789AY624171
35 Metarhizium flavoviride Metarhizium AF339531AF339580DQ522400DQ522353AF138271
36 Ophiocordyceps acicularis Ophiocordyceps EF468805EF468950EF468852EF468744JN049820
37 Ophiocordyceps acicularis Ophiocordyceps EF468804EF468951EF468853EF468745
38 Ophiocordyceps aphodii Ophiocordyceps DQ518755DQ522541DQ522323
39 Ophiocordyceps entomorrhiza Ophiocordyceps EF468809EF468954EF468857EF468749JN049850
40 Ophiocordyceps melolonthae Ophiocordyceps DQ518762DQ522548DQ522376DQ522331KF937353
41 Ophiocordyceps stylophora Ophiocordyceps EF468837EF468982EF468882EF468777
42 Ophiocordyceps stylophora Ophiocordyceps DQ518766DQ522552DQ522382DQ522337JN049828
43 Ophiocordyceps unilateralis Ophiocordyceps DQ518768DQ522554DQ522385DQ522339AY494596
44 Ophiocordyceps variabilis Ophiocordyceps EF468839EF468985EF468885EF468779
45 Ophiocordyceps variabilis Ophiocordyceps DQ518769DQ522555DQ522386
46 Ophiocordyceps gracilis Ophiocordyceps EF468810EF468955EF468858EF468750HM119586
47 Ophiocordyceps gracilis Ophiocordyceps EF468811EF468956EF468859EF468751JN049851
48 Ophiocordyceps heteropoda Ophiocordyceps AY489722AY489690AY489651AY489617
49 Ophiocordyceps heteropoda Ophiocordyceps EF468812EF468957EF468860EF468752JN049852
50 Ophiocordyceps nigrella Ophiocordyceps EF468818EF468963EF468866EF468758JN049853
51 Ophiocordyceps rhizoidea Ophiocordyceps EF468825EF468970EF468873EF467764JN049857
52 Ophiocordyceps rhizoidea Ophiocordyceps EF468824EF468969EF468872EF468765GU723769
53 Ophiocordyceps robertsii Ophiocordyceps EF468826EF468766AJ309335
54 Ophiocordyceps sobolifera Ophiocordyceps KJ878898KJ878933KJ879013KJ878979KT281884
55 Cordyceps ninchukispora Cordyceps EF468846EF468991EF468900EF468795AY245642
56 Pochonia chlamydosporia Pochonia AF339544AF339593EF469098EF469069MH858871
57 Simplicillium lamellicola Simplicillium AF339552AF339601DQ522404DQ522356MH854806
58 Simplicillium lanosoniveum Simplicillium AF339554AF339603DQ522405DQ522357AJ292395
59 Simplicillium lanosoniveum Simplicillium AF339553AF339602DQ522406DQ522358AJ292396
60 Simplicillium obclavatum Simplicillium AF339517AF339567EF468798MH860859
61 Tolypocladium longisegmentum Tolypocladium EF468816EF468864
62 Tolypocladium fractum Tolypocladium DQ518759DQ522545DQ522373DQ522328
63 Glomerella cingulata Polycephalomyces AF543786AF543762AY489659AF543773EU326204
64 Glomerella cingulata Polycephalomyces U48428U48427DQ858454AF543772EU326192
Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationships among T011 and concatenated data set based on the analysis of ML method with bootstrap 1,000. The support values associated with each internal branch correspond to NJ, MP, ML method, indicating that T011 was closely related to C. cicadae (Teleomorph of I. cicadae).

The concatenated dataset of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 genes used for the construction of phylogenetic trees Phylogenetic relationships among T011 and concatenated data set based on the analysis of ML method with bootstrap 1,000. The support values associated with each internal branch correspond to NJ, MP, ML method, indicating that T011 was closely related to C. cicadae (Teleomorph of I. cicadae).

Discussion

Morphology analysis indicated that T011 is Isaria cicadae, belonged to the family of Cordycipitaceae. Based on the morphology analysis, our specimen T011 shared the common features of Isaria cicadae Miq. Bull. Sci. phys. nat. Néerl.: 85 (1838) [17], including: (1) specimen grew in the soil, (2) parasite on the nymph of cicada, (3) synnemata were simple and erect with branching, white to cream, (4) colonies were floccose, white and turned into powdery with age, and (5) conidia: hyaline to white, cylindrical, large (T011: 4.7–6.5 × 2.6–3.1 mm, and referent: 3.5–8.0 × 1.5–3.5 µm). To confirm the authenticity of T011 as Isaria cicadae, the construction of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1-based phylogeny was performed. According to Mitchell et al. (1995), they suggested that molecular phylogenetic approaches to fungal evolution have proved valuable information toward the goals of understanding the relationship among the specific fungal groups [8]. Additionally, the use of fungal molecular data, including ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1, for the identification of fungi ushered in a new era of molecular phylogenetic sequence identification in kingdom Fungi [1,12]. In this study, the combination of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 genes were applied to strongly strengthen the identification of T011, which was classified as I. cicadae. According to phylogenetic analysis, phylogenetic analysis of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 yielded consistent topology in different taxa of Clavicipitaceae. The phylogenetic position of T011 was obtained and accepted at subclade level: Cordyceps. Notably, within this clade, the highly supported monophyletic group with referent C. cicadae was obtained with high bootstrap value (Bootstrap >95: NJ: 100; MP: 100; ML: 100) and separated this group from other referent taxon in subclade Cordyceps, such as C. ninchukispora, C. pruinosa, and C. kyusyuensis. Additionally, T011 formed the group with referent C. cicadae, Cordyceps sp., and Isaria sp. Among them, Cordyceps sp. and Isaria sp. were proposed using the ancient Chinese name “chanhua” (Cordyceps chanhua) [25]. Therefore, based on the phylogenetic analysis, the T011 was identified as the Isaria cicadae (anamorph of C. cicadae), which was strongly similar to Cordyceps chanhua. Therefore, we have successfully applied the phylogenetic analyses based on the concatenated dataset to strengthen the identification of T011, collected in the local coffee garden in Ea Knop Town – Ea Kar District, as I. cicadae (anamorph of C. cicadae).

Conclusion

We have successfully applied the phylogenetic analysis of multiple genes of ITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, Rpb1, and Tef1 to demimit sample T011, which was collected in Ea Knop Town – Ea Kar District, Đak Lak Province, was strongly supported as Isaria cicadae (anamorph of C. cicadae), which was similar to our preliminary identification. This is the first molecular record of Isaria cicadae in Vietnam.
  14 in total

1.  On the relationships of Paecilomyces sect. Isarioidea species.

Authors:  J Jennifer Luangsa-ard; Nigel L Hywel-Jones; Leka Manoch; Robert A Samson
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2005-05

2.  Immunomodulatory functions of extracts from the Chinese medicinal fungus Cordyceps cicadae.

Authors:  Shu-Cheng Weng; Cheng-Jen Chou; Lie-Chwen Lin; Wei-Jern Tsai; Yuh-Chi Kuo
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.360

3.  Ethanolic extract of Cordyceps cicadae exerts antitumor effect on human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells by inducing apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Authors:  Hongqing Xie; Xiaotong Li; Yajie Chen; Mingzi Lang; Zhangfei Shen; Liangen Shi
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.360

4.  Multigene phylogeny reveals new lineage for Stachybotrys chartarum, the indoor air fungus.

Authors:  Lisa A Castlebury; Amy Y Rossman; Gi-Ho Sung; Aimee S Hyten; Joseph W Spatafora
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2004-08

5.  Phylogenetic classification of Cordyceps and the clavicipitaceous fungi.

Authors:  Gi-Ho Sung; Nigel L Hywel-Jones; Jae-Mo Sung; J Jennifer Luangsa-Ard; Bhushan Shrestha; Joseph W Spatafora
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.097

6.  Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.

Authors:  R Vilgalys; M Hester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Fungal Identification Using Molecular Tools: A Primer for the Natural Products Research Community.

Authors:  Huzefa A Raja; Andrew N Miller; Cedric J Pearce; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.050

8.  Potential therapeutic effects of Cordyceps cicadae and Paecilomyces cicadae on adenine-induced chronic renal failure in rats and their phytochemical analysis.

Authors:  Ling Li; Tong Zhang; Chunru Li; Lu Xie; Ning Li; Tianling Hou; Yuqin Wang; Bing Wang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 9.  Cordyceps: a traditional Chinese medicine and another fungal therapeutic biofactory?

Authors:  R Russell M Paterson
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.072

10.  Identification of cordycepin biosynthesis-related genes through de novo transcriptome assembly and analysis in Cordyceps cicadae.

Authors:  Tengfei Liu; Ziyao Liu; Xueyan Yao; Ying Huang; Qingsong Qu; Xiaosa Shi; Hongmei Zhang; Xinyuan Shi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.