| Literature DB >> 34307724 |
Ryan E Wiegand1,2,3, W Evan Secor1, Fiona M Fleming4, Michael D French5, Charles H King6, Susan P Montgomery1, Darin Evans7, Jürg Utzinger2,3, Penelope Vounatsou2,3, Sake J de Vlas8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current World Health Organization guidelines utilize prevalence of heavy-intensity infections (PHIs), that is, ≥50 eggs per 10 mL of urine for Schistosoma haematobium and ≥400 eggs per gram of stool for S. mansoni, to determine whether a targeted area has controlled schistosomiasis morbidity or eliminated schistosomiasis as a public health problem. The relationship between these PHI categories and morbidity is not well understood.Entities:
Keywords: control; elimination; mass drug administration; morbidity; preventive chemotherapy; schistosomiasis; ultrasound
Year: 2021 PMID: 34307724 PMCID: PMC8297701 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis ISSN: 2328-8957 Impact factor: 3.835
Figure 1.Line graphs of the prevalence of 6–15 year-old school children who were Schistosoma infection and heavy-intensity positive (row A), S. haematobium morbidity positive (row B), and S. mansoni morbidity positive (row C) at each survey year (BL = baseline, FU1 = follow-up 1, FU2 = follow-up 2). S. haematobium infections were assessed by urine filtration and S. mansoni infections by Kato-Katz. Plots of individual ultrasound indicators for S. haematobium and additional morbidity indicators for both species are included in Supplementary Figures 1 and 2.
Odds Ratios and 95% Credible Intervals From Bayesian Logistic Regression Models Comparing Morbidity-Positive Proportions Between Heavy-Intensity Prevalence Categories Within Surveys for S. haematobium–Related Morbidities
| Morbidity | Survey | <1% vs ≥5% | 1–5% vs ≥5% | <1% vs 1–5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any urinary bladder lesions | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Follow-up 1 |
|
|
| |
| Follow-up 2 |
|
| 0.98 (0.67–1.44) | |
| Any upper urinary tract lesions | Baseline | 0.90 (0.56–1.45) | 0.77 (0.47–1.22) | 1.18 (0.67–2.07) |
| Follow-up 1 | 0.67 (0.41–1.10) | 0.83 (0.51–1.34) | 0.81 (0.46–1.42) | |
| Follow-up 2 | 0.61 (0.25–1.36) | 0.36 (0.09–1.07) | 1.68 (0.47–7.52) | |
| Microhematuria | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Follow-up 1 |
|
|
| |
| Follow-up 2 |
|
|
| |
| Pain while urinating | Baseline |
|
| 0.92 (0.77–1.11) |
| Follow-up 1 | 0.95 (0.80–1.13) | 1.28 (1.06–1.55) |
| |
| Follow-up 2 |
|
| 0.99 (0.77–1.27) |
Bold font indicates that the 95% Bayesian credible interval does not contain 1. Participants are school-age children, aged 5–15 years, enrolled between 2003 and 2008. Plots of unmodeled estimates are included in Figure 2.
Figure 2.Line graphs of Schistosoma haematobium–related morbidity positive prevalence. Heavy-intensity prevalence category was determined at the school level. Participants were enrolled between 2003 and 2008 at each survey year (BL = baseline, FU1 = follow-up 1, FU2 = follow-up 2). Clustering by school was accounted for in 95% confidence bands. Infections were assessed by urine filtration. Model-based tests comparisons are included in Table 1. Plots of individual indicators and model-based comparisons are included in Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 2, respectively.
Figure 3.Line graphs of Schistosoma mansoni–related morbidity percentages. Heavy-intensity prevalence category was determined at the school level. Participants were enrolled between 2003 and 2008 at each survey year (BL = baseline, FU1 = follow-up 1, FU2 = follow-up 2). Clustering by school was accounted for in 95% confidence bands. Infections were assessed by Kato-Katz thick smears. Model-based test comparisons are included in Table 2. Plots of additional indicators and model-based comparisons are included in Supplementary Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 4, respectively.
Odds Ratios and 95% CIs From Bayesian Logistic Regression Models Comparing Morbidity-Positive Proportions Between Heavy-Intensity Prevalence Categories Within Surveys for S. mansoni–Related Morbidities
| Morbidity | Survey | <1% vs ≥5% | 1–5% vs ≥5% | <1% vs 1–5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image patterns C–F | Baseline |
| 0.79 (0.29–2.11) |
|
| Follow-up 1 | 0.20 (0.01–1.79) | 1.80 (0.72–4.55) | 0.11 (0.01–1.06) | |
| Follow-up 2 | Nonestimablea | |||
| Enlarged portal vein | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Follow-up 1 |
| 0.82 (0.51–1.28) | 0.75 (0.48–1.19) | |
| Follow-up 2 |
|
| 1.10 (0.66–1.94) | |
| Laboratory-confirmed diarrhea | Baseline |
|
| 1.01 (0.81–1.28) |
| Follow-up 1 |
|
|
| |
| Follow-up 2 |
| 1.37 (0.97–1.94) |
| |
| Self-reported diarrhea | Baseline |
| 1.08 (0.95–1.23) |
|
| Follow-up 1 | 0.87 (0.75–1.00) |
|
| |
| Follow-up 2 | 0.93 (0.78–1.11) | 1.01 (0.81–1.25) | 0.92 (0.78–1.10) |
Bold font indicates that the 95% credible interval does not contain 1. Participants are school-aged children, aged 5–15 years, enrolled between 2003 and 2008. Plots of unmodeled estimates are included in Figure 3.
aThe odds ratios for image patterns C–F at follow-up 2 were highly variable due to the prevalence being close to 0. We chose to omit this effect due to its instability.