| Literature DB >> 34307649 |
Nga Thi Thuy Nguyen1, Thanh Xuan Nguyen1,2,3, Anh Trung Nguyen1,2, Thu Thi Hoai Nguyen1,2, Tam Ngoc Nguyen1,2, Huong Thi Thu Nguyen1,2, Huong Thi Thanh Nguyen1,3, Thang Pham1,2, Huyen Thi Thanh Vu1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe handgrip strength (HGS) and identify associated factors in community-dwelling older adults in rural Vietnam.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34307649 PMCID: PMC8285188 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1237547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Characteristics of the study's participants according to measurement of handgrip strength.
| Total, | HGS mean (SD) | 95% CI |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||||
| | 152 (49.4%) | 18.4 (6.2) | 17.5-19.4 | 7.347 | 0.001 |
| | 109 (35.4%) | 16.8 (5.2) | 15.8-17.8 | ||
| | 37 (12.0%) | 15.0 (5.0) | 13.5–16.5 | ||
|
| |||||
| Gender | |||||
| | 109 (35.4%) | 21.6 (6.1) | 20.5–22.8 | 25.204 | <0.001 |
| | 199 (64.6%) | 15.3 (4.3) | 14.7–15.9 | ||
|
| |||||
| Education | |||||
| | 108 (35.1%) | 14.8 (4.1) | 14.0–15.6 | 29.348 | |
| | 169 (54.9%) | 17.7 (5.6) | 16.8-18.5 | ||
| | 23 (7.5%) | 24.1 (5.5) | 21.8-26.4 | <0.001 | |
| | 8 (2.6%) | 25.5 (5.7) | 16.7–18.0 | ||
|
| |||||
| Marital status | |||||
| | 13 (4.2%) | 15.4 (5.8) | 11.9–19.0 | ||
| | 191 (62.0%) | 18.5 (6.1) | 17.7–19.4 | 11.114 | <0.001 |
| | 104 (33.7%) | 15.4 (4.5) | 14.5–16.3 | ||
|
| |||||
| BMI | |||||
| | 88 (28.6%) | 17.1 (5.5) | 15.9–18.2 | 1.035 | |
| | 166 (53.9%) | 17.1 (5.7) | 16.3–18.1 | 0.356 | |
| | 54 (17.5%) | 18.4 (6.0) | 16.6–20.2 | ||
|
| |||||
| Malnutrition | |||||
| | 121 (39.3%) | 18.2 (6.1) | 17.1–19.2 | 1.767 | |
| | 48 (15.6%) | 17.0 (5.2) | 15.5–18.5 | 0.173 | |
| | 139 (45.1%) | 16.8 (5.6) | 15.9–17.7 | ||
|
| |||||
| Risk of fall (TUG score) | |||||
| | 171 (55.5%) | 18.6 (5.8) | 17.7–19.5 | 19.649 | <0.001 |
| | 137 (44.5%) | 15.8 (5.4) | 14.8–16.7 | ||
|
| |||||
| Number of current medications (mean (SD)) | 0.4 (0.6) | 17.5 (5.9) | 16.9–18.2 | 0.087 | 0.128∗ |
|
| |||||
| ADL score (mean (SD)) | 4.5 (2.6) | 17.5 (5.9) | 16.9–18.2 | 0.088 | 0.123∗ |
|
| |||||
| IADL score (mean (SD)) | 5.9 (0.4) | 17.5 (5.9) | 16.9–18.2 | 0.263 | <0.001∗ |
p value by ANOVA/independent t-test; ∗using Pearson correlation. Activities of daily living (ADL) score (range 0–6, a higher number indicate higher independence). Instrumental activities of daily living scale (IADLs) score (range 0-8, a higher number indicate higher independence).
Means and standard deviations (SD) of handgrip strength (kg) stratified by gender, sex, and BMI.
| Age | Females | Males | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Total | Underweight | Normal weight | Overweight |
| Total | Underweight | Normal weight | Overweight | |
| 80-84 | 105 | 15.7 ± 3.8 | 14.8 ± 3.0 | 15.7 ± 4.4 | 16.8 ± 2.3 | 47 | 24.6 ± 6.1 | 22.9 ± 6.4 | 24.5 ± 5.2 | 27.3 ± 7.5 |
| 85-89 | 67 | 14.7 ± 4.2 | 14.1 ± 4.4 | 15.5 ± 3.5 | 14.1 ± 5.1 | 42 | 20.1 ± 5.0 | 21.6 ± 3.4 | 15.6 ± 5.2 | 20.4 ± 7.1 |
| ≥90 | 27 | 14.7 ± 5.5 | 13.1 ± 1.6 | 14.1 ± 5.9 | 12 ± 0.0 | 20 | 16.5 ± 4.5 | 16.0 ± 5.3 | 16.0 ± 4.8 | 19.2 ± 2.5 |
Association between HGS and IADLs, ADL, risk of fall, and other factors on multiple regression model.
| Beta |
| 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | -0.196 | -0.270 | (-0.397)-(-0.143) | <0.001 |
| Female (male) | -0.443 | -5.361 | (-6.594)-(-4.127) | <0.001 |
| Illiterate (primary school and higher) | -0.130 | -1.581 | (-2.742)-(-0.419) | 0.008 |
| High school/higher (secondary or lower) | 0.079 | 2.886 | (-0.403)-6.175 | 0.085 |
| Single/widowed (married) | -0.022 | -0.264 | -1.406-0.878 | 0.649 |
| Number of current medications | 0.005 | 0.041 | -0.777-0.860 | 0.921 |
| Risk of fall (TUG score) | -0.114 | -1.328 | (-2.400)-(0.255) | 0.015 |
| IADLs total score | 0.153 | 0.344 | 0.134-0.554 | 0.001 |
| ADL total score | 0.044 | 0.595 | -0.612-1.802 | 0.333 |
The result was present in variables (reference). Beta: standardized regression coefficient; B: unstandardized regression coefficient. The variables included in this model were chosen if p value ≤ 0.2 in Table 1. Activities of daily living (ADL) score (range 0–6, a higher number indicate higher independence). Instrumental activities of daily living scale (IADLs) score (range 0-8, a higher number indicate higher independence).