| Literature DB >> 34307146 |
Hui Liu1, Liyun Zheng2, Gaofeng Shi1, Qian Xu1, Qi Wang1, Hongshan Zhu1, Hui Feng1, Lijia Wang1, Ning Zhang1, Meng Xue1, Yongming Dai2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of current study was to introduce noninvasive and reproducible MRI methods for in vivo functional assessment of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).Entities:
Keywords: IVIM; NSCLC; OE-MRI; UTE; lung adenocarcinoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 34307146 PMCID: PMC8292137 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.677942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Summary of the demographic and clinical features of the patients.
| Variables | Total (n = 44) |
|---|---|
|
| 57.34 ± 8.32 |
|
| 25 (56.8%) |
|
| 3.19 ± 0.68 |
|
| 2.59 ± 0.52 |
|
| 6.93 ± 1.12 |
|
| 3.20 ± 0.40 |
|
| |
| | 1 (2.27%) |
| | 4 (9.09%) |
| | 7 (15.91%) |
| | 24 (54.55%) |
|
| 4 (9.09%) |
|
| 4 (9.09%) |
|
| 6.28 ± 3.22 |
|
| 4.12 ± 2.15 |
|
| 0.935 ± 0.32 |
|
| 7.452 ± 5.041 |
|
| 24.76 ± 7.62 |
SD, standard deviation; FEV1, forced expiratory lung volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; PEF, peak expiratory flow; MMEF, maximum mid-expiratory flow; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma; PSE, percent signal enhancement.
Figure 1Heat map depicting Spearman’s correlations between the PFTs (FVC, FEV1, PEF, MMEF) and imaging parameters (D, D*, f from IVIM-DWI and whole lung mean PSE). (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 2Representative lesion-based analysis of LUAD patients. (A) Transverse T2 image for patient with low histological tumor grade (lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma); (B, C) are corresponding f map and PSE map for (A); (D) Transverse T2 image for patient with intermediate histological tumor grade (acinar predominant adenocarcinoma); (E, F) are corresponding f map and PSE map for (D); (G) Transverse T2 image for patient with high histological tumor grade (solid predominant adenocarcinoma); (H, I) are corresponding f map and PSE map for (G);.
Figure 3Comparison of the tumor mean PSE between different histological tumor grades using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Figure 4Comparison of the f between different histological tumor grades using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Figure 5Scatter plot depicting Spearman’s correlation between the tumor mean PSE and f. These dots (*) are the values for each patient.
The ROC analysis results of using OE-MRI and IVIM-DWI to differentiate low histological tumor grade from intermediate to high histological tumor grade.
| Tumor mean PSE | f | Tumor mean PSE + f | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.714 | 0.667 | 0.800 |
|
| 0.700 | 0.900 | 0.667 |
|
| 0.776 | 0.781 | 0.810 |
ROC, receiver operating characteristics; OE-MRI, oxygen-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; IVIM-DWI, intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging; PSE, percent signal enhancement.