| Literature DB >> 34307090 |
Ignacio M Espiñeira1,2, Patricia N Vidal3,4, María C Ghersevich5, Elber A Soler Arias3, Fernanda Bosetti1,3, María F Cabrera Blatter1,3, Diego D Miceli3,6, Víctor A Castillo1,3.
Abstract
Background: The expression and overexpression of luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors in the canine adrenal gland cortex have been reported. Therefore, it was hypothesized that a LH-dependent form of Cushing's syndrome (CS) could exist in dogs. Aim: To assess whether the adrenal gland post-ovariectomy (OVx) exhibits a greater response to adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) stimulation; to evaluate whether the adrenal gland responds to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation by increasing the release of cortisol; and to consider whether hCG stimulus testing would be useful as a diagnosis for possible cases of LH-dependent CS.Entities:
Keywords: Aberrant receptors; Cushing’s syndrome; Gonadectomy; Luteinizing hormone; hCG
Year: 2021 PMID: 34307090 PMCID: PMC8288738 DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Vet J ISSN: 2218-6050
Fig. 1.Stimulation with ACTH before and after OVx. Note that after OVx, cortisol concentrations are higher. **p = 0.002 between baseline cortisol values; ***p = 0.0003 between 1-hour cortisol values. Median is indicated. Each circle corresponds to a studied dog. Delimited area corresponds to normal range of cortisol, pre- and post-ACTH stimulus.
Dogs with CS.
| Cases | Age of diagnosis | Age of OVx | Time of OVx diagnosis | ACTH Test (>551.8 nmol/l) | Dexs/CCR decrease >50 %) | hCG Test (>161.4 nmol/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 M | 9 | 3 | 6 | + | + | N |
| #2 M | 9 | 3 | 6 | + | + | N |
| #3: Poodle | 14 | 2 | 12 | + | + | N |
| #4 M | 11 | 6 | 5 | + | + | N |
| #5 Basenji | 7 | 2 | 5 | + | N | N |
| #6 M** | 9 | 4 | 5 | + | N | N |
| #7 M | 10 | 8 | 2 | N | N | + |
| #8 M | 9 | 7 | 2 | N | N | + |
| #9 Fox T.** | 12 | 9 | 3 | + | N | + |
| #10 Beagle | 9 | 8 | 1 | N | N | + |
| #11 M | 13 | 9 | 4 | N | N | + |
| #12 M | 12 | 9 | 3 | N | N | + |
| #13 M | 9 | 5 | 4 | N | N | + |
| #14 M | 10 | 7 | 3 | N | N | + |
M = mixed-breed female dogs; Fox T. = Fox Terrier; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; n/v = non-visible; **Dogs with nodes in adrenal gland; + = Shows a higher response than the cut-off value 1-hour poststimulation or suppresses more than 50% post-dexamethasone administration; N = no hyperresponsive or no dexamethasone suppression. Poststimulation or suppression cut-off values are indicated.Age of diagnosis, age of OVx, and time elapsed between OVx and CS diagnosis are shown, as well as responses to ACTH tests, dexamethasone suppression/CCR and hCG test.
Fig. 2.Stimulation with ACTH. (a) The response in all female dogs with CS-OVx (14); (b) separate responses of resulting CS-OVxA and CS-OVxB groups. It can be observed that not all stimulations (7/14) exceed the cut-off value of 551.8 nmol/l after 1 hour. The delimited area corresponds to basal cortisol reference values.
Fig. 3.Cortisol concentration with 5000 IU of hCG stimulation test. (a) CG dogs and CS-OVx dogs (group of 14 dogs); (b) resulting CS-OVxA and CS-OVxB groups. (a) No considerable changes were detected in the CG after 1 hour; cortisol level increased compared to its baseline value in CS-OVx dogs (*p = 0.02). The basal cortisol concentration in this group was higher than in the GC (a–bp = 0.002). (b) **p = 0.008; 1-hour cortisol versus baseline cortisol of CS-OVxB; a–bp = 0.0007; 1-hour cortisol of CS-OVxA versus 1-hour cortisol of CS-OVxB. There are no differences between basal cortisol concentrations of both groups. The delimited area corresponds to basal cortisol reference values.
Fig. 4.Comparison of cortisol at post-hCG time between the CGs, CS-OVxA, and CS-OVxB. It is expressed as median and 10th and 90th percentiles. The dotted line indicates the value of 140 nmol/l, with no overlap between the maximum values of CS-OVxA and the minimum values of CS-OVxB. (a–a) There are no significant differences; (a versus b) p = 0.0007.
∆-M-m and %M values from hCG stimulation tests carried out on CG and dogs grouped in CS-OVxA and CS-OVxB.
| CG | CS-OVxA | CS-OVxB | Possible cut-off | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆M-m | 5.1 | 0.1 | 183.5a (92.7–667.7) | >30 |
| %M | 13.2 | 0.1 | 197.5b (92.3–672) | >30 |
Values are expressed as median and P10–P90.ap = 0.0007 versus CS-OVxA and versus CG. bp = 0.0007 versus CS-OVxA and versus CG. There are no differences between CS-OVxA and CG.
Fig. 5.Age of CS diagnosis, age of OVx, and time between OVx and CS diagnosis between CS-OVxA and CS-OVxB. There are differences only between age of OVx and time lapse and between OVx and CS diagnosis. Line indicates median age. **p = 0.0013 (CS-OVxA vs. CS-OVxB) and **p = 0.0007 (time lapse). Dx-Age: age at diagnosis; OVx-age: age of ovariectomy.