Literature DB >> 34306921

Comparative Efficacy of Transsphenoidal Endonasal Endoscopic and Microscopic Pituitary Surgery at Single Center of a Developing Country.

Vivek Phogat1, Manish Agarwal1, Virendra D Sinha1, Devendra Purohit1.   

Abstract

Objective  This study was aimed to compare comparative efficacy of transsphenoidal endonasal endoscopic and microscopic pituitary surgery at single center of a developing country. Methods  This study included 198 patients in which 50 patients were studied prospectively and 148 patients were studied retrospectively, diagnosed with pituitary adenoma who presented to neurosurgery department at Sawai Man Singh hospital in Jaipur, India, and were operated via transsphenoidal route between 2013 and 2018. Patients' records were reviewed and relevant clinical and surgical data were collected. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure performed, endoscopic endonasal transsphenoid approach (group 1) and microscopic transsphenoidal approach (group 2). Outcomes, in terms of efficacy and the resulting complications of each procedure were compared and analyzed. Results  A total of 198 patients with pituitary adenoma were operated during the study period. Among them, 119 (60.1%) patients were operated by endoscopic and 79 (39.9%) patients were operated by microscopic transsphenoidal approach. In endoscopic group, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was present in 39 patients (32.77%) and 23 (29.11%) in microscopic group. Complete tumor removal was achieved in 69.75% in endoscopic and 48.13% in microscopic group ( p  = 0.004). Endocrine control was achieved in 78.94% (30 out of 38) in endoscopic and 68.18% (15 out of 22 patients) in microscopic group. Conclusion  The transsphenoidal approaches for resection of pituitary adenoma, both endoscopic and microscopic approach, are minimally invasive and effective for disease control. Both the approaches lead to similar endocrine control, visual symptoms, complications, and long-term outcome. Therefore, the selection of the final approach should be individualized, ultimately depending on the surgeons' comfort, experience, and familiarity with the particular technique. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscope; pituitary adenoma; transsphenoidal surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 34306921      PMCID: PMC8289506          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  13 in total

1.  [Intracranial endoscopic explorations].

Authors:  J GUIOT; J ROUGERIE; M FOURESTIER; A FOURNIER; C COMOY; J VULMIERE; R GROUX
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1963-05-18       Impact factor: 1.228

2.  Endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery.

Authors:  R Jankowski; J Auque; C Simon; J C Marchal; H Hepner; M Wayoff
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Risk Factors and Management of Intraoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Endoscopic Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma: Analysis of 492 Patients.

Authors:  Qiangyi Zhou; Zhijun Yang; Xingchao Wang; Zhenmin Wang; Chi Zhao; Shun Zhang; Peng Li; Shiwei Li; Pinan Liu
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience.

Authors:  I Ciric; A Ragin; C Baumgartner; D Pierce
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  [Surgery of the pituitary gland, using the trans-sphenoidal approach. Comparative study of 2 technical methods].

Authors:  J Hardy
Journal:  Union Med Can       Date:  1967-06

6.  A comparison between endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery and traditional trans-sphenoidal microsurgery for functioning pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  R-X Cheng; H-L Tian; W-W Gao; Z-Q Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly.

Authors:  A Giustina; P Chanson; M D Bronstein; A Klibanski; S Lamberts; F F Casanueva; P Trainer; E Ghigo; K Ho; S Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: surgical results of 228 pituitary adenomas treated in a pituitary center.

Authors:  Jackson A Gondim; Michele Schops; João Paulo C de Almeida; Lucas Alverne F de Albuquerque; Erika Gomes; Tânia Ferraz; Francisca Andréa C Barroso
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Endoscopic versus Microscopic Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: An Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Hanuman Prasad Prajapati; Shashi Kant Jain; Virendra D Sinha
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Ammirati; Lai Wei; Ivan Ciric
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.