Literature DB >> 34306919

The Effect of Timing of Surgery in Pituitary Apoplexy on Continuously Valued Visual Acuity.

Patrick D Kelly1, Shanik J Fernando2, Jordan A Malenke2, Rakesh K Chandra2, Justin H Turner2, Lola B Chambless1.   

Abstract

Background  Pituitary apoplexy is often treated urgently, but this is based on studies which assess vision categorically and dichotomizes the time interval between symptom onset and surgery which may introduce bias in measuring an association between the two. Objective  This study was aimed to assess for a relationship between continuously valued surgery delay and visual acuity recovery after pituitary apoplexy. Methods  In this retrospective study, all patients presenting with symptomatic pituitary apoplexy between 2004 and 2016 were identified from an institutional database. The primary endpoint was visual acuity improvement, measured as the difference in acuity from the pre- to postoperative period, and measured in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) units. Analysis was performed using continuous values of time delay and visual acuity to assess for an underlying association. Results  Thirty-two pituitary apoplexy patients were identified. Visual acuity deficits were reported in 81%. The median visual acuity was 0.35 LogMAR (Snellen's fraction 20/40) preoperatively, and 0.1 (20/25) postoperatively ( p  < 0.01). The time between symptom onset and surgery was not associated with improvement in visual acuity ( p  = 0.46). When the time delay and visual outcome were intentionally dichotomized, patients undergoing surgery within 2 days of symptom onset had 0.21 times the odds of a good visual outcome (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04-1.05). Conclusion  When assessed as continuously valued measures, the time from symptom onset to surgical intervention and the improvement in visual acuity are not associated, although intentional dichotomization of data produced conflicting results. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acuity; delayed pituitary apoplexy; early; timing; vision

Year:  2020        PMID: 34306919      PMCID: PMC8289513          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  27 in total

1.  Visual outcome of blind eyes in pituitary apoplexy after transsphenoidal surgery: a series of 14 eyes.

Authors:  Deepak Agrawal; Ashok Kumar Mahapatra
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-01

2.  Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms.

Authors:  O Naggara; J Raymond; F Guilbert; D Roy; A Weill; D G Altman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for pituitary apoplexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming Tu; Qin Lu; Penglei Zhu; Weiming Zheng
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Surgical intervention for pituitary apoplexy: an analysis of functional outcomes.

Authors:  Martin J Rutkowski; Sandeep Kunwar; Lewis Blevins; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  A prospective study of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: presentation, management, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Lukui Chen; William L White; Robert F Spetzler; Bainan Xu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Pituitary apoplexy.

Authors:  Claire Briet; Sylvie Salenave; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 7.  Presenting Symptoms of Pituitary Apoplexy.

Authors:  Efstratios-Stylianos Pyrgelis; Ioannis Mavridis; Maria Meliou
Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.268

8.  Dichotomization: 2 x 2 (x2 x 2 x 2...) categories: infinite possibilities.

Authors:  Karyn K Heavner; Carl V Phillips; Igor Burstyn; Warren Hare
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  A retrospective analysis of pituitary apoplexy.

Authors:  D C Bills; F B Meyer; E R Laws; D H Davis; M J Ebersold; B W Scheithauer; D M Ilstrup; C F Abboud
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  Pituitary Apoplexy.

Authors:  Claire Briet; Sylvie Salenave; Jean-François Bonneville; Edward R Laws; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 19.871

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting Pituitary Apoplexy.

Authors:  Diane Donegan; Dana Erickson
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2022-07-26

Review 2.  Pituitary Apoplexy: Risk Factors and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Betina Biagetti; Rafael Simò
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.