Literature DB >> 34306551

Proposal for a New Fixation Method for Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture-Metaphyseal Stem: A Finite-Element Analysis.

Anderson Freitas1,2, Fabrício Reichert Barin1, Leonardo Rigobello Battaglion2, Hélio Ismael da Costa1, Eduardo Duarte Santos1, Hugo Amando Rosado1, Marcos Giordano3, Vincenzo Giordano4, Antonio Carlos Shimano2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biomechanical behavior of a metaphyseal stem specifically designed for the fixation of Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures using finite-element analysis.
METHODS: Three different constructions were studied: the dynamic hip screw with a superior anti-rotation screw (DHS + ARS), multiple cannulated screws in an inverted triangle configuration (ASNIS), and the Metaphyseal Nailing System (MNS), a new implant developed by the authors. Vertical and total displacement, localized and total maximum and minimum principal, and the Von Mises peak stresses were evaluated.
RESULTS: Results are shown for the DHS + ARS, ASNIS, and MNS models, respectively. Vertical displacement (mm) was 1.49, 3.63, and 1.90; total displacement (mm) was: 5.33, 6.02, and 6.30; localized maximum principal (Mpa) was: 2.77, 4.5, and 1.7; Total maximum principal (Mpa) was: 126, 223, and 531; localized minimum principal (Mpa) was: -1.8, -3.15, and -0.39; total minimum (Mpa) was: -121, -449, and -245; and Von Mises peak stress (MPA) was: 315.5, 326.1, and 286.0.
CONCLUSION: The present FEM study showed that the MNS device increases general stresses and reduces localized stresses, when compared to the DHS + ARS and ASNIS constructions used to fix Pauwels type-III femoral neck fracture in synthetic models. In this sense, the MNS showed a low fracture focus shift, conducive to the consolidation environment. The significant reduction in the maximum principal stress, allows to affirm that the main deforming force, the shear, in this fracture pattern, was considerably reduced and the low value of Von Mises obtained, consistent with an implant capable of making an effective load sharing. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral neck fracture; Finite-element analysis; Internal fixation; Intramedullary fixation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34306551      PMCID: PMC8275808          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00420-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  19 in total

Review 1.  Pauwels' classification of femoral neck fractures: correct interpretation of the original.

Authors:  J Bartonícek
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Biomechanical comparison of dynamic hip screw, proximal femoral nail, cannulated screw, and monoaxial external fixation in the treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Y Imren; V Gurkan; K Bilsel; E E Desteli; M Tuna; C Gurcan; I Tuncay; C Sen
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.531

Review 3.  Optimizing Stability in Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Ye Ye; Jiandong Hao; Cyril Mauffrey; E Mark Hammerberg; Philip F Stahel; David J Hak
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Application of a medial buttress plate may prevent many treatment failures seen after fixation of vertical femoral neck fractures in young adults.

Authors:  Hassan Mir; Cory Collinge
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 5.  Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly.

Authors:  Michalis Panteli; Paul Rodham; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures. A randomized prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  G C Bannister; A G Gibson; C E Ackroyd; J H Newman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Complications following young femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  G P Slobogean; S A Sprague; T Scott; M Bhandari
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Stability of L-shaped and inverted triangle fixation assemblies in treating Pauwels type II femoral neck fracture: a comparative mechanical study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giordano; Roger Pletsch Paes; Danilo Diniz Alves; Arthur Bonfim Amaral; William D Belangero; Marcos Giordano; Anderson Freitas; Hilton A Koch
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-24

9.  Biomechanical Study Using the Finite Element Method of Internal Fixation in Pauwels Type III Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Noda; Yasuhiro Saegusa; Masayasu Takahashi; Daichi Tezuka; Kazuhiko Adachi; Kazuya Naoi
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2015-08-26

Review 10.  An update on the Pauwels classification.

Authors:  Min Shen; Chen Wang; Hui Chen; Yun-Feng Rui; Song Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Locking Autocompression Screw Model in Pauwels Type-3 Femoral Neck Fracture: In Vitro Analysis.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giordano; Anderson Freitas; Robinson Esteves Pires; Leonardo Rigobello Battaglion; Mariana de Oliveira Lobo; William Dias Belangero
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.