Juhui Chen1, Xiaogang Ying1, Danfeng Yang1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Hangzhou 310015, Zhejiang Province, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of using isoflurane and propofol combined with remifentanil in laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC). METHODS: A total of 118 patients undergoing LC in our hospital from April 2018 to January 2019 were recruited as the study cohort. 56 of the patients were anesthetized with isoflurane combined with remifentanil during their operations (the IR group), and the other 62 patients were anesthetized with propofol combined with remifentanil during their operations (the PR group). The effects of the two anesthesia methods on the hemodynamics and stress responses were compared, and the postoperative recoveries, adverse reactions, analgesia, and cognitive functions were recorded. RESULTS: Compared with the IR group, the average arterial pressure, heart rate, norepinephrine, and cortisol decreased in the PR group. Compared with the IR group, the total postoperative adverse reaction rate was lower in the PR group. Compared with the IR group, the spontaneous respiration recovery times, the times to opening eyes, and the extubation times were significantly shortened in the PR group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative pain levels between the two groups. Compared with the IR group, the postoperative cognitive function assessment was better in the PR group. CONCLUSION: Compared with isoflurane combined with remifentanil, propofol combined with remifentanil has a smaller impact on the hemodynamics and cognitive functions of patients undergoing LC, and it causes a more significant reduction in the stress response. In addition, its postoperative adverse reactions are lower, so it is worthy of promoting in clinical practice. AJTR
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of using isoflurane and propofol combined with remifentanil in laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC). METHODS: A total of 118 patients undergoing LC in our hospital from April 2018 to January 2019 were recruited as the study cohort. 56 of the patients were anesthetized with isoflurane combined with remifentanil during their operations (the IR group), and the other 62 patients were anesthetized with propofol combined with remifentanil during their operations (the PR group). The effects of the two anesthesia methods on the hemodynamics and stress responses were compared, and the postoperative recoveries, adverse reactions, analgesia, and cognitive functions were recorded. RESULTS: Compared with the IR group, the average arterial pressure, heart rate, norepinephrine, and cortisol decreased in the PR group. Compared with the IR group, the total postoperative adverse reaction rate was lower in the PR group. Compared with the IR group, the spontaneous respiration recovery times, the times to opening eyes, and the extubation times were significantly shortened in the PR group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative pain levels between the two groups. Compared with the IR group, the postoperative cognitive function assessment was better in the PR group. CONCLUSION: Compared with isoflurane combined with remifentanil, propofol combined with remifentanil has a smaller impact on the hemodynamics and cognitive functions of patients undergoing LC, and it causes a more significant reduction in the stress response. In addition, its postoperative adverse reactions are lower, so it is worthy of promoting in clinical practice. AJTR
Authors: Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Nadja Smailagic; Marta Roqué I Figuls; Agustín Ciapponi; Erick Sanchez-Perez; Antri Giannakou; Olga L Pedraza; Xavier Bonfill Cosp; Sarah Cullum Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-03-05