| Literature DB >> 34306085 |
Frank Mayta-Tovalino1,2, Alicia Fernández-Giusti1, Joyce Del Pino3, Daniel Alvitez-Temoche4, Roman Mendoza4, Abigail Temoche4, Arnaldo Munive-Degregori5.
Abstract
AIM: To formulate and develop a new experimental polishing paste based on Coturnix coturnix eggshell and to evaluate its abrasive, remineralizing, and antibacterial activities.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34306085 PMCID: PMC8279843 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9998989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Formulation and development of the experimental polishing dentifrice.
| Components | Quantity | ×5 | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eggshell-powdered quail | 25.0 g | 125 g | Abrasive |
| Tetrasodium pyrophosphate | 3.75 g | 18.75 g | Additives |
| Aerosil (hydrophilic fumed silica) | 0.20 g | 1.00 g | Additives |
| Nipagin (sodium methylparaben) | 0.15 g | 0.75 g | Preservative |
| Crystallized sodium saccharin | 0.20 g | 1.00 g | Sweetener |
| Menthol crystals | 0.80 g | 4.00 g | Flavoring |
| Titanium dioxide (dye) | 0.53 g | 2.65 g | Binder |
| Xanthan gum | 1.05 g | 5.25 g | Whiteness to toothpastes |
| Sodium lauryl ether sulfate (LESS), 28% | 2.00 g | 10.00 g | Surfactants |
| Sodium fluoride (fluoride) | 0.32 g | 1.60 g | 1450 ppm fluorine |
| Liquid glycerine | 24.00 mL | 120.00 mL | Moisturizer |
| Distilled water | 42.00 mL | 210.00 mL | Moisturizer |
| Total | 100.00 | 500.00 |
Figure 1Preparation of experimental quail toothpaste and control toothpaste.
Figure 2Measurement of inhibition halos against the different microorganisms evaluated. Group A: S. aureus ATCC® 25923™; group B: E. coli ATCC® 25922™; group C: E. faecalis ATCC® 29212™; group D: C. albicans ATCC® 10231™; and group E: S. mutans ATCC® 25175™.
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of quail paste versus others according to time and type of microorganism.
| Group | Microorganism | Time |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 hours | 48 hours | ||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Control paste |
| 12.53 | 0.16 | 12.33 | 0.13 | 0.619 | >0.05‡ |
| Quail paste | 12.63 | 0.08 | 12.33 | 0.16 | 0.433 | ||
| Universal Polishing paste | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | ||
| Diamond Excel paste | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | ||
|
| |||||||
| Control paste |
| 12.61 | 0.08 | 12.56 | 0.10 | 0.740 | >0.05‡ |
| Quail paste | 12.68 | 0.07 | 12.36 | 0.10 | 0.678 | ||
| Universal Polishing paste | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | ||
| Diamond Excel paste | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | ||
|
| |||||||
| Control paste |
| 12.61 | 0.75 | 12.28 | 0.11 | 0.945 | >0.05‡ |
| Quail paste | 12.71 | 0.07 | 12.31 | 0.14 | 0.841 | ||
| Universal Polishing paste | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | ||
| Diamond Excel paste | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | ||
|
| |||||||
| Control paste |
| 6.53 | 0.30 | 6.16 | 0.16 | 0.840 | <0.001† |
| Quail paste | 8.70 | 0.14 | 8.43 | 0.12 | 0.924 | ||
| Universal Polishing paste | 7.00 | 0.11 | 7.00 | 0.11 | — | ||
| Diamond Excel paste | 11.10 | 5.44 | 13.41 | 0.27 | 0.051 | ||
|
| |||||||
| Control paste |
| 11.45 | 0.31 | 10.71 | 0.43 | 0.835 | <0.001† |
| Quail paste | 11.65 | 0.15 | 11.21 | 0.29 | 0.160 | ||
| Universal Polishing paste | 8.71 | 0.11 | 8.25 | 0.18 | 0.841 | ||
| Diamond Excel paste | 11.25 | 1.17 | 10.3 | 0.49 | 0.001 | ||
Shapiro–Wilk test. ⁑Student's t-test (groups with null values were excluded from the analysis). †ANOVA test. All measurements were expressed in mm, using the Kirby–Bauer method.