| Literature DB >> 34305938 |
Rongxin Dai1,2,3,4, Ge Lv2,3,4, Wenyan Li2,3,4, Wenjing Tang1,2,3,4, Junjie Chen2,3,4, Qiao Liu2,3,4, Lu Yang2,3,4, Min Zhang2,3,4, Zhirui Tian2,3,4, Lina Zhou2,3,4, Xin Yan1,2,3,4, Yating Wang1,2,3,4, Yuan Ding2,3,4, Yunfei An1,2,3,4, Zhiyong Zhang1,2,3,4, Xuemei Tang1,2,3,4, Xiaodong Zhao2,3,4.
Abstract
Background: SCN4 is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the G6PC3 gene. The clinical, molecular, and immunological features; function of neutrophils; and prognosis of patients with SCN4 have not been fully elucidated.Entities:
Keywords: G-CSF treatment; G6PC3; NETs; apoptosis; neutrophils; severe congenital neutropenia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34305938 PMCID: PMC8296982 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.699743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Clinical characteristics of patients with G6PC3 mutations.
| Haematological features | Infections | Urogenital abnormalities | Cutaneous abnormalities | Digestive tract | Vascular and Cardiac features | Growth and Development | Other features | Treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Neutropenia, Anemia, Intermittent thrombocytopenia | Recurrent Pneumonia, Recurrent ulcer, Otitis media | Cryptorchidism, Bilateral inguinal hernia | None | None | None | Short stature | Asthma | Received G –CSF treatment for 4 years, discontinued for half year, Rrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole |
| P2 | Neutropenia | Recurrent Pneumonia, Recurrent ulcer | Cryptorchidism, Bilateral inguinal hernia | Prominent superficial venous pattern | IBD | None | Short stature | Slight scoliosis | During G-CSF treatment |
Figure 1Neutrophil counts before and after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment. (A) Neutrophil count in patient 1 before G-CSF treatment. (B) Neutrophil count during G-CSF treatment in patient 1; Measurements after discontinuation of G-CSF treatment are shown on the right side of the dotted line. (C) Neutrophil count before G-CSF treatment in patient 2. (D) Neutrophil count during G-CSF treatment in patient 2. (E) Images of peripheral blood samples from patient 2 before and during G-CSF treatment, stained with Wright’s stain. (F) Neutrophils dominate Ficoll-Paque enriched SCN4 granulocyte fractions. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on Ficoll-Paque enriched granulocytes from patient 2 and healthy control to examine the number of neutrophils. The percentages of myeloid cells (CD11b+CD45+CD16+) and neutrophils (CD11b+CD45+CD16+) were determined.
Immunologic features of lymphocytes and immunoglobulin in the patients.
| CD3% | CD8% | Naïve CD8+ T cells% | CD4% | Naïve CD4+ T cells% | NK% | CD19% | Naïve B cells% | CD4+T cells proliferation | IgG | IgA | IgM | IgE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 62.1% | 38.02%* | 11.6% | 11.65%# | 4.9%# | 29.67%* | 8.22%# | 2.7%# | Normal | 10.6g/L | 0.135g/L | 2.36g/L | 9IU/ml |
| P2 | 61.31% | 28.45% | 60.6% | 25.67%# | 18.3%# | 11.5% | 27.17% | 66.5% | Normal | 25.4g/L | 0.845g/L | 1.35g/L | 8.9IU/ml |
*Increased, #Decreased.
Quantification of TRECs and KRECs.
| Patients | TRECs (copies/10^5cells) | KRECs (copies/10^5cells) |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Control 1 | 3914 | 2115 |
| Healthy Control 2 | 1490 | 1716 |
| Healthy Control 3 | 2829 | 1172 |
| Patient 1 | 129 | 6 |
| Patient 2 | 142 | 1408 |
G6PC3 gene mutation status in patients and their parents.
| Patients | Exon | Mutation | Protein | Inherit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | Exon2 | c.295C>T | p.Q99X | Father |
| Exon6 | c.766_768del | p.256_256del | Mother | |
| Patient 2 | Exon 6 | c. 758G>A | p.R253H | Father |
| Exon 5 | c.596A>G | p.Y199C | Mother |
Figure 2Deletions and point mutations detected by targeted deep sequencing. (A) Schematic representation of G6PC3 gene mutations in the two patients. (B) Sequence analysis of G6PC3 in patient 1, his father, and his mother. (C) Sequence analysis of G6PC3 in patient 2, his father, and his mother. ClustalW alignment of human, chimpanzee, macaque, dog, cow, mouse, and rat G6PC3 protein sequences and mutations detected in patients 1 (D, E) and 2 (F, G). (D) amino acids 85–111, the conserved glutamine at position 99 is highlighted in a black box; (E) amino acids 235–261, the conserved methionine at position 256 is highlighted in a black box; (F) amino acids 235–261, the conserved arginine at position 253 is highlighted in a black box; (G) amino acids 180–206, the conserved tyrosine at position 199 is highlighted in a black box.
Figure 3CXCR4 expression on neutrophils and NK cells. (A) (Left) Representative histograms of neutrophils from patient 2 during G-CSF treatment and healthy controls. (Right) The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CXCR4 in neutrophils from patient 2 and healthy controls (n=3). (B) Representative histograms of NK cells from patient 1 during and after discontinuation of G-CSF treatment (Left), patient 2 before and during G-CSF treatment (Right), and healthy controls. (C) The MFI of CXCR4 on NK cells from patient 1 after discontinuation of G-CSF treatment, patient 2 before and during G-CSF treatment and healthy controls (n=3).
Figure 4Detection of respiratory burst activity induced by PMA stimulation. (A) Whole blood was incubated in the absence or presence of PMA, as indicated. Respiratory burst was detected via conversion of DHR-123 in neutrophils. Median fluorescence intensity of the entire neutrophil-gated cell population, enclosed by the marker bar, is specified in each plot. (B) Mean (± SD) respiratory burst stimulation index (SI) values in healthy controls and patients 1 and 2.
Figure 5Apoptosis of human neutrophils analyzed using annexin V and propidium iodide staining. (A) Neutrophils from healthy controls (HCs) and patient 1 following cessation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment, and patient 2 before and during G-CSF treatment, at baseline and following culture with or without lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or FAS for 16 h. Cells were stained for annexin V and propidium iodide, analyzed using flow cytometry. Mean (± SD) percentages of live neutrophils (B), total apoptotic neutrophils (C), and late apoptotic neutrophils (D) among total neutrophils at baseline. Mean (± SD) percentages of live neutrophils (E), total apoptotic neutrophils (F), and late apoptotic neutrophils (G) among total neutrophils after culture without stimulation for 16 h. Mean (± SD) percentages of live neutrophils (H), total apoptotic neutrophils (I), and late apoptotic neutrophils (J) among total neutrophils after culture with LPS for 16 h. Mean (± SD) percentages of live neutrophils (K), total apoptotic neutrophils (L), and late apoptotic neutrophils (M) among total neutrophils after culture with FAS for 16 h.
Figure 6Expulsion of NETs from neutrophils. (A) Fluorescence generated by neutrophils from patient 1 and healthy controls at each time-point following incubation in the presence or absence of PMA stimulation. (B) Fluorescence generated by neutrophils from patient 2 and healthy controls at each time-point following incubation in the presence or absence of PMA stimulation.