| Literature DB >> 34305896 |
Caterina Veroni1, Francesca Aloisi1.
Abstract
The cause and the pathogenic mechanisms leading to multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS), are still under scrutiny. During the last decade, awareness has increased that multiple genetic and environmental factors act in concert to modulate MS risk. Likewise, the landscape of cells of the adaptive immune system that are believed to play a role in MS immunopathogenesis has expanded by including not only CD4 T helper cells but also cytotoxic CD8 T cells and B cells. Once the key cellular players are identified, the main challenge is to define precisely how they act and interact to induce neuroinflammation and the neurodegenerative cascade in MS. CD8 T cells have been implicated in MS pathogenesis since the 80's when it was shown that CD8 T cells predominate in MS brain lesions. Interest in the role of CD8 T cells in MS was revived in 2000 and the years thereafter by studies showing that CNS-recruited CD8 T cells are clonally expanded and have a memory effector phenotype indicating in situ antigen-driven reactivation. The association of certain MHC class I alleles with MS genetic risk implicates CD8 T cells in disease pathogenesis. Moreover, experimental studies have highlighted the detrimental effects of CD8 T cell activation on neural cells. While the antigens responsible for T cell recruitment and activation in the CNS remain elusive, the high efficacy of B-cell depleting drugs in MS and a growing number of studies implicate B cells and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a B-lymphotropic herpesvirus that is strongly associated with MS, in the activation of pathogenic T cells. This article reviews the results of human studies that have contributed to elucidate the role of CD8 T cells in MS immunopathogenesis, and discusses them in light of current understanding of autoreactivity, B-cell and EBV involvement in MS, and mechanism of action of different MS treatments. Based on the available evidences, an immunopathological model of MS is proposed that entails a persistent EBV infection of CNS-infiltrating B cells as the target of a dysregulated cytotoxic CD8 T cell response causing CNS tissue damage.Entities:
Keywords: B cells; CD8 T cells; Epstein-Barr virus (EBV); anti-EBV immunity; multiple sclerosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34305896 PMCID: PMC8292956 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.665718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
EBV intersection with MS.
| EBV features | Brief description | Compatibility with MS |
|---|---|---|
| EBV epidemiology | Ubiquitous DNA herpesvirus that infects about 90% of the global population. EBV infection is mostly asymptomatic in childhood but primary exposure during adolescence or adulthood frequently causes infectious mononucleosis ( | Previous exposure to EBV is required, though not sufficient, to develop MS ( |
| EBV biology | EBV is transmitted through saliva, infects mainly B cells and epithelial cells and establishes a life-long latent infection in memory B cells ( | The B-cell growth promoting properties of EBV could explain the expansion and differentiation of B cells in the CNS of MS patients throughout the disease. |
| Persistent, treatment resistant intrathecal B-cell activation and immunoglobulin synthesis are a characteristic of MS ( | ||
| B cells and plasmablasts/plasma cells, usually absent in the normal CSF, are found in the CSF of MS patients and their number correlates with inflammation, blood-brain barrier breakdown and intrathecal Ig synthesis ( | ||
| B cells and plasma cells are found in CNS tissue in early and chronic MS stages ( | ||
| EBV immunology | Continuous immune surveillance is essential to maintain virus-host homeostasis throughout the host’s life. Following primary infection, the rapid antibody response to EBNA2 and EBV lytic proteins, like the virus capsid antigen (VCA), is important to control the virus, and is followed by a slow increase of the neutralizing antibody response (mainly towards the major envelope EBV protein gp350) and a delayed EBNA1 IgG response. Most studies of the T-cell response to EBV during primary infection have been carried out in people with symptoms of infectious mononucleosis. Early control of EBV infection is associated with expansion of innate immune cells, mainly NK cells ( | Altered humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to EBV in MS patients suggest EBV dysregulation/inadequate virus control. |
| EBV pathogenic potential | EBV is etiologically linked to a wide range of human malignancies, including B-cell malignancies, like Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma and post-transplant B-lymphoproliferative disease, NK/T cell lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma ( | The mechanisms linking EBV infection to MS pathology remain elusive. Several hypotheses have been proposed, each calling for further studies: |
| EBV is also the etiological agent of immunopathologic diseases that are caused by an excessive immune response towards uncontrolled EBV infection, like infectious mononucleosis, a self limiting lymphoproliferative disease, and chronic active EBV infection, a very serious condition with persistence of infectious mononucleosis-like symptoms and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. | ▪ According to Pender ( |
Figure 1B cell antigen presentation in MS. B cells could contribute to the activation of pathogenic T cells through presentation of self and non-self antigens. (A) CD27+ CD20+ memory B cells could present self-peptides from proteins that are expressed in the CNS leading to the induction of autoreactive T cells. Infection of B cells with EBV induces EBV-specific T cells that exert continuous immune surveillance and are essential for virus-host homeostasis. EBV infected B cells could induce autoreactive T cells by presenting EBV peptides sharing similarities with peptides from CNS self-antigens (i.e. MBP, RASGPR2) (molecular mimicry). Autoreactive T cells homing to the CNS would recognize their target antigen on local antigen presenting cells (APC) and become reactivated causing CNS inflammation and tissue injury. (B) EBV infected CD27+ CD20+ memory B cells induce EBV-specific T cells that migrate in the CNS to counteract an abnormal EBV infection brought inside the CNS by circulating infected B cells. In this model, B cells would act as APC both in the periphery and in the CNS to stimulate a detrimental antiviral immune response causing CNS inflammation and tissue injury.
Figure 2HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis and multiple sclerosis: Two chronic CNS inflammatory diseases, two viruses, a common immunopathologic mechanism? The text of this figure summarizes the tropism, biology and pathogenic potential of HTLV-1 and EBV and their association with HAM/TSP and MS, respectively. The HTLV-1-mediated immunopathological model of HAM/TSP is presented vis-a-vis the hypothesized EBV-mediated immunopathological model of MS. The left side of the sketch depicts the migration of HTLV-1-infected CD4 T cells and the activation of a cytotoxic response towards HTLV-1-infected CD4 T cells in the spinal cord in HAM/TSP, leading to production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IFNγ and the lytic enzymes granzyme B and perforin, which play a key role in bystander tissue injury. On the right side of the sketch, a similar virus-driven immunopathological mechanism involving EBV-infected B cells and EBV-specific CD8 T cells is proposed for MS.
Figure 3EBV-driven immunopathological model of MS. This figure depicts the main steps potentially leading to establishment of an abnormal EBV infection in the CNS and the ensuing immunopathological response. In individuals at risk of developing MS, defective immune control of the virus could be determined by a high viral load at primary infection (infectious mononucleosis), genetic influences on immune system function, coincident infections and/or any other environmental factor affecting the host’s immune system status. In susceptible individuals, EBV-infected memory B cells could elude immune control and seed into the CNS where they would expand favouring EBV persistence and periodic EBV reactivation (the CNS as an EBV sanctuary). Though activated in the periphery, CNS-homing EBV specific T cells do not clear the virus and become exhausted over time due to persistent, abnormal viral reactivation. The protective antiviral immune response turns into a dysfunctional immune response that promotes CNS inflammation and causes collateral neural cell damage.
Effects of MS therapies on T cells and B cells in the cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood of patients with multiple sclerosis.
| Disease modifying immunotherapy | Cerebrospinal fluid | Peripheral blood |
|---|---|---|
| IFNβ | Not reported | Reduced frequency of IFNγ producing CD4 and CD8 T cells ( |
| Reduced CXCR3 expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells ( | ||
| Decrease in CD8 T cells expressing activation markers (CD26, CD71) ( | ||
| Increase in CD8 T cells producing anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL10, IL13) ( | ||
| Reduced number of memory B cells and decrease in EBV gene expression ( | ||
| Absence of CD8 T cell response to EBV in stable MS patients ( | ||
| Glatiramer acetate (GA) | Increase of GA-specific T cells with an anti-inflammatory Th2 phenotype ( | Induction of Th2 immune responses ( |
| Increase of GA-specific regulatory CD4 and CD8 T cells ( | ||
| Increased IL10 and reduced proinflammatory cytokine production by B cells ( | ||
| Increased frequency of EBV latent antigen-specific CD8 T cells, decrease of senescent EBV-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes and memory B cells ( | ||
| Dymethyl fumarate | Reduced leukocyte counts, mainly CD4 T cells ( | Variable degree of lymphopenia, with reduction of memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, more marked for CD8 T cells, and memory B cells ( |
| Reduced number of pro-inflammatory B cells ( | ||
| Teriflunomide | Not reported | Mild lymphopenia with modest reduction of CD4 T cells, mainly Th1 cells, CD8 T cells ( |
| Fingolimod | Reduced leukocyte counts and lower CD4/CD8 ratio ( | Reduced lymphocyte counts, with marked reduction of T cells, mainly CD4 T cells and the naïve and central memory subsets; B cells, mainly memory B cells, are also reduced ( |
| Siponimod | Not reported | Reduced lymphocyte counts with marked reduction of B cells, CD4 and CD8 T cells, mainly the naïve and central memory subsets ( |
| Ozanimod | Not reported | Reduced lymphocyte counts with marked reduction of B and T cells, mainly naïve and central memory CD4 T cells ( |
| Natalizumab | Lower leukocyte counts, reduced numbers of CD4 and CD8 T cells, B cells and plasma cells; lower CD4/CD8 ratio ( | Higher lymphocyte counts, with increase in effector memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, NK cells and memory B cells ( |
| Increased frequency of CD4 and CD8 T cells ( | ||
| Increased frequency of CD8 T cells specific for EBV and other viral antigens ( | ||
| Cladribine | Disappearance of oligoclonal bands in about half of treated patients ( | Reduced lymphocyte counts with decrease of NK cells, CD4 and CD8 T cells, and more marked and persistent reduction of B cells, mainly the memory subset ( |
| Alemtuzumab | Not reported | Marked lymphopenia with decrease of all lymphocyte populations, with more persistent depletion of T cells than B cells, hyperpopulation by immature and naïve B cells and marked long term depletion of memory B cells ( |
| Rituximab ocrelizumab ofatumumab | Significant reduction of B cells and T cells with rituximab treatment ( | Marked, long-term B cell depletion ( |
| Small reduction of T cells ( | ||
| Reduction of pro-inflammatory CD20+ T cells ( |