| Literature DB >> 34305689 |
Jindong Chang1,2, Wenbing Zhu3, Jia Zhang4, Liming Yong1,2, Ming Yang1,2, Jibing Wang5, Jiagao Yan6.
Abstract
The present study aimed to assess the effects of square dance exercise on the cognitive function and quality of life in older women with mild cognitive impairment and to investigate the mediating role of a depressed mood and reduced quality of life in the relationship between square dance exercise and cognition. The study design was a single-blind whole-group controlled trial. A total of 136 eligible participants were divided according to their nursing home into either an experimental or control group. The nursing home grouping was determined by the drawing of lots. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Quality of Life (SF-12) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) were used to assess participants at baseline, week 9, and week 18, respectively. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to compare the results at baseline with mid-test and post-test changes in cognitive function and quality of life. Maximum likelihood estimation (ML) and robust standard errors were used to perform the mediation model. The study results indicated that the experimental group (compared to the control group) had a significant improvement in cognitive function, quality of life, and mood state at baseline in the mid-test and post-test results. The results of this 18-week experiment showed that the exercise-cognition relationship was significantly mediated by a reduction in depressive symptoms (indirect effect: β = -0.375; 95% CI = -0.864 to -0.069) and an improvement in quality of life (indirect effect: β = -0.678; 95% CI = -1.222 to -0.290). This study revealed the effects of moderate-intensity square dance exercise on cognitive function and quality of life in older Chinese women with mild cognitive impairment and explored the potential mediating mechanisms. These findings can be used to inform the development of public health policies to promote brain health in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese square dance; cognition; depression; mediation model; mild cognitive impairment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34305689 PMCID: PMC8298898 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1The hypothesis-mediating model.
Figure 2Flowchart of participants recruitment (16).
Baseline characteristics of participants.
| Age, years | 76.29 ± 3.60 | 76.56 ± 3.60 | 75.94 ± 3.61 | 0.369 |
| Education, years | 8.53 ± 2.06 | 8.73 ± 2.05 | 8.28 ± 2.06 | 0.261 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.62 ± 2.08 | 23.63 ± 2.14 | 23.60 ± 2.03 | 0.956 |
| MoCA | 21.56 ± 2.23 | 21.61 ± 2.11 | 21.49 ± 2.39 | 0.776 |
| GDS | 4.92 ± 1.50 | 4.97 ± 1.41 | 4.85 ± 1.63 | 0.690 |
| QLS | 90.70 ± 6.74 | 91.24 ± 6.65 | 89.98 ± 6.85 | 0.334 |
| PCS | 43.00 ± 6.66 | 43.09 ± 6.49 | 42.87 ± 6.95 | 0.863 |
| MCS | 47.70 ± 5.38 | 48.15 ± 4.97 | 47.11 ± 5.89 | 0.320 |
Continuous variables are presented as the means ± standard deviations (SDs).
BMI, Body mass index; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; QLS, Quality of Life; PCS, Physical Component Summary; MCS, Mental Component Summary.
Comparison of the experimental and control groups across time.
| Baseline | 21.61 ± 2.11 | 21.49 ± 2.39 | |||||||
| Week 9 | 22.08 ± 2.03 | 21.38 ± 2.29 | 0.451 (−0.584, 1.485) | 0.393 | 1.042 (0.516, 1.568) | <0.001 | −0.574 (−0.948, −0.200) | 0.003 | 0.59 |
| Week 18 | 22.34 ± 1.87 | 21.21 ± 2.13 | 0.378 (−0.618, 1.374) | 0.457 | 0.864 (0.428, 1.300) | <0.001 | −0.501 (−0.748, −0.254) | <0.001 | 0.71 |
| Baseline | 4.97 ± 1.41 | 4.85 ± 1.63 | |||||||
| Week 9 | 4.55 ± 1.17 | 4.96 ± 1.38 | −0.642 (−1.470, 0.185) | 0.128 | −0.945 (−1.468, −0.422) | <0.001 | 0.526 (0.170, 0.881) | 0.004 | −0.56 |
| Week 18 | 4.31 ± 1.14 | 5.02 ± 1.67 | −0.532 (−1.207, 0.142) | 0.122 | −0.746 (−0.996, −0.497) | <0.001 | 0.416 (0.228, 0.604) | <0.001 | −0.88 |
| Baseline | 91.24 ± 6.65 | 89.98 ± 6.85 | |||||||
| Week 9 | 93.40 ± 6.19 | 89.46 ± 6.37 | 1.406 (−2.023, 4.834) | 0.422 | 4.824 (2.530, 7.118) | <0.001 | −2.670 (−4.160, −1.181) | <0.001 | 0.63 |
| Week 18 | 94.54 ± 5.63 | 88.71 ± 6.31 | 1.019 (−2.074, 4.112) | 0.519 | 3.930 (2.470, 5.389) | <0.001 | −2.283 (−3.188, −1.379) | <0.001 | 0.99 |
| Baseline | 43.09 ± 6.49 | 42.87 ± 6.95 | |||||||
| Week 9 | 44.09 ± 6.07 | 42.88 ± 6.40 | 0.758 (−2.186, 3.702) | 0.614 | 1.976 (0.735, 3.218) | 0.002 | −0.982 (−1.800, −0.164) | 0.019 | 0.45 |
| Week 18 | 44.69 ± 5.35 | 42.71 ± 6.50 | 0.654 (−2.205, 3.512) | 0.654 | 1.678 (0.528, 2.828) | 0.004 | −0.878 (−1.482, −0.274) | 0.004 | 0.43 |
| Baseline | 48.15 ± 4.97 | 47.11 ± 5.89 | |||||||
| Week 9 | 49.31 ± 4.40 | 46.58 ± 5.34 | 0.648 (−2.410, 3.706) | 0.678 | 2.847 (0.665, 5.030) | 0.011 | −1.688 (−3.147, −0.229) | 0.023 | 0.44 |
| Week 18 | 49.84 ± 4.86 | 45.99 ± 6.41 | 0.365 (−2.119, 2.849) | 0.773 | 2.252 (0.910, 3.594) | 0.001 | −1.405 (−2.245, −0.566) | 0.001 | 0.63 |
Figure 3The mediating model after 9-week intervention.
Figure 4The mediating model after 18-week intervention.