| Literature DB >> 34305615 |
Bangtao Yao1, Fei Wang2, Xiaogui Zhao1, Bei Wang1, Xiaoli Yue3, Yuhua Ding2, Gang Liu1.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (0.1% pranoprofen) on the expression of VEGF and Cox-2 in primary pterygium.Entities:
Keywords: 01% Pranoprofen; cyclo-oxygen-ase-2; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; pterygium; vascular endothelial growth factor
Year: 2021 PMID: 34305615 PMCID: PMC8298757 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.709251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eyes, n | 38 | 37 | 40 | — |
| Sex, n (%) | — | — | — | 0.786 |
| Male | 18 (47.4) | 15 (40.5) | 19 (47.5) | |
| Female | 20 (52.6) | 22 (59.5) | 21 (52.5) | |
| Age, years (mean ± SD) | 64.32 ± 9.22 | 64.78 ± 8.11 | 63.57 ± 8.39 | 0.381 |
| Eye type, n (%) | — | — | — | 0.528 |
| Right | 20 (52.6) | 21 (56.8) | 26 (65.0) | |
| Left | 18 (47.4) | 16 (43.2) | 14 (35.0) | |
| Duration of onset, years | 9.95 (5.75–10.0) | 9.22 (5.0–10.0) | 8.50(5.0–10.0) | 0.703 |
| Combined systemic disease, n (%) | 11 (28.9) | 10 (27.0) | 13 (32.5) | 0.866 |
| LogMAR BCVA (mean ± SD) | 0.41 ± 0.24 | 0.44 ± 0.25 | 0.44 ± 0.27 | 0.778 |
| Intraocular pressure, mmHg (mean ± SD) | 14.34 ± 1.94 | 14.76 ± 2.21 | 13.85 ± 1.89 | 0.146 |
| VEGF, median (range) | 4 (3–4) | 4 (4–5) | 5 (4–5) | 0.001 |
| Negative (-), n (%) | 6 (15.8%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Weak positive (+), n (%) | 7 (18.4%) | 8 (21.6%) | 7 (17.5%) | — |
| Moderate positive (++), n (%) | 25 (65.8%) | 24 (64.9%) | 28 (70.0%) | — |
| Strong positive (+++), n (%) | 0 | 5 (13.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | — |
| COX-2, median (range) | 3 (2–4) | 4 (3–5) | 4 (4–5) | 0.003 |
| Negative (−), n (%) | 8 (21.1%) | 1 (2.7%) | 1 (2.5%) | — |
| Weak positive (+), n (%) | 14 (36.8%) | 12 (32.4%) | 4 (10.0%) | — |
| Moderate positive (++), n (%) | 16 (42.1%) | 20 (54.1%) | 32 (80.0%) | — |
| Strong positive (+++), n (%) | 0 | 4 (10.8%) | 3 (7.5%) | — |
VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; COX: cyclo-oxygen-ase; LogMAR BCVA: logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity.
FIGURE 1The atrophy of epithelial cells (yellow arrows) and/or hyperplasia (green arrows), with the presence of increased goblet cells (blue arrows) were noted, distinct fibroblast proliferation with mild inflammatory cell infiltration were observed under the mucosa. (A) HE staining of human primary pterygium (case 15 in group 1) is demonstrated, the small vessels (red arrows) were observed, without evidence of capillary hyperplasia and vasodilation, original magnification: 100×. (B–C) Primary pterygium specimen with negative VEGF and COX-2 expression, respectively. No staining reaction in the cytoplasm of vascular enothelial cells (red arrows), original magnification: B–C 200×. (D) HE staining of human primary pterygium (case 9 in group 2) is demonstrated, moderate capillary hyperplasia indicating angiogenesis (black arrows), and moderate vasodilation (red arrows) were noted, original magnification: 100×. (E–F) Primary pterygium specimen with moderate VEGF and COX-2 expression, respectively. Note the typical diffuse staining reaction in the cytoplasm of vascular endothelial cells (red arrows), original magnification: E–F 200×. (G) HE staining of human primary pterygium (case 37 in group 3) is demonstrated, capillary cluster hyperplasia indicating severe angiogenesis (black arrows), and severe vasodilation (red arrows) were observed, original magnification: 100×. (H–I) Primary pterygium specimen with high VEGF and COX-2 expression, respectively. Note the typical diffuse staining reaction in the cytoplasm of vascular endothelial cells (red arrows), original magnification: H–I 200×.
VEGF and COX-2 expression in pterygial vascular endothelial cells.
| Group | No | Total score | Expression level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEGF, median (range) | COX-2, median (range) | VEGF, n (%) | COX-2, n (%) | ||||
| Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | ||||
| 1 | 38 | 4 (3–4) | 3 (2–4) | 6 (15.8%) | 32 (84.2%) | 8 (21.1%) | 30 (78.9%) |
| 2 | 37 | 4 (4–5) | 4 (3–5) | 0 | 37 (100%) | 1 (2.7%) | 36 (97.3%) |
| 3 | 40 | 5 (4–5) | 4 (4–5) | 0 | 40 (100%) | 1 (2.5%) | 39 (97.5%) |
| 1 VS 2: 0.024 | 1 VS 2: 0.018 | 1 VS 2: 0.036 | 1 VS 2: 0.037 | ||||
| 1 VS 3: 0.001 | 1 VS 3: 0.005 | 1 VS 3: 0.028 | 1 VS 3: 0.027 | ||||
| 2 VS 3: 0.886 | 2 VS 3: 1.000 | 2 VS 3: - | 2 VS 3: 1.000 | ||||
VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; COX: cyclo-oxygen-ase.
FIGURE 2(A–C) The correlations between the total score of VEGF and COX-2 within the groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The total score of VEGF and COX-2 was scored as 0–7. HE: Hematoxylin and eosin; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; COX-2: cyclo-oxygen-ase-2.
Correlations between levels of VEGF and COX-2 expression in primary pterygium patients.
| Group No | — | COX-2 | r | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | VEGF | Negative (−) | Weak positive (+) | Moderate positive (++) | Strong positive (+++) | 0.473 | 0.003 |
| Negative (−) | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Weak positive (+) | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| Moderate positive (++) | 1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | ||||
| Strong positive (+++) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 2 | 37 | VEGF | — | — | — | — | 0.550 | <0.001 |
| Negative (−) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Weak positive (+) | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Moderate positive (++) | 0 | 5 | 17 | 2 | ||||
| Strong positive (+++) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| 3 | 40 | VEGF | — | — | — | — | 0.413 | 0.008 |
| Negative (−) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Weak positive (+) | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| Moderate positive (++) | 0 | 2 | 24 | 2 | ||||
| Strong positive (+++) | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | ||||
Detection of the expressing level of VEGF and COX-2 by immunohistochemistry.