Literature DB >> 34305491

Forecasting fully vaccinated people against COVID-19 and examining future vaccination rate for herd immunity in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World.

Pınar Cihan1.   

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) has spread rapidly all over the world and it is known that the most effective way to eliminate the disease is vaccination. Although the traditional vaccine development process is quite long, more than ten COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for use in about a year. The COVID-19 vaccines that have been administered are highly effective enough, but achieving herd immunity is required to end the pandemic. The motivation of this study is to contribute to review the countries' vaccine policies and adjusting the manufacturing plans of the vaccine companies. In this study, the total number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was forecasted in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World with the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model, which is a new approach in vaccination studies. Additionally, for herd immunity, the percentage of fully vaccinated people in these regions at the beginning of 2021 summer was determined. ARIMA results show that in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World will reach 139 million, 109 million, 127 million, 8 million, 38 million, and 441 million people will be fully vaccinated on 1 June 2021, respectively. According to these results, 41.8% of the US, 2.3% of Asia, 17% of Europe, 0.6% of Africa, 8.8% of South America, and 5.6% of the World population will be fully vaccinated people against the COVID-19. Results show that countries are far from the herd immunity threshold level desired to reach for safely slow or stop the COVID-19 epidemic.
© 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARIMA; COVID-19; Forecasting; Herd immunity; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine

Year:  2021        PMID: 34305491      PMCID: PMC8278839          DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Soft Comput        ISSN: 1568-4946            Impact factor:   6.725


Introduction

The coronavirus was reported as pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In January 2020, it was determined that the disease agent was a new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) that was not previously detected in humans. Because of its high similarity to SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), it was named SARS-CoV-2, and the disease that occurred was later named coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) [1]. The virus spread rapidly around the world, as there is no treatment and vaccine for COVID-19 disease. In the first three months, 114 countries were affected by the virus, and 4291 deaths occurred. As a result of the rapid spread of the disease, it was declared as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 [2]. SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted from an infected person without symptoms and can lead to a pandemic disease within a week. This situation shows how important and mandatory vaccination is in controlling SARS-CoV-2 [3]. Therefore, a lot of effort has been made recently to develop vaccines against human coronavirus infections such as MERS and SARS. However, the fact that antiviral agents or vaccines have not been developed against MERS and SARS viruses until today has made COVID-19 a global threat [4], [5], [6]. Developed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are based on mRNA, viral vector, inactive and protein. mRNA type vaccines provide the genetic code (DNA or RNA) for our cells to produce viral proteins. Once the proteins (non-disease causing) are produced, the body develops immunity against the virüs [7]. The first COVID-19 vaccine is Pfizer–BioNTech and is of the mRNA type. In viral vector-based vaccines, the genetic material of the virus is inserted into other viruses that do not cause genetic disease and applied to humans. Inactivated or weakened virus vaccine technique is the classical method. Here, the weakened or dead virus is used. In protein-based vaccine, virus proteins are used either directly isolated from the virus or artificially produced. Developed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and properties of these vaccines are given in Table 1.
Table 1

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and properties of vaccines.

VaccineEfficacyTypeStorageDoses
Pfizer–BioNTech [8]95%mRNA−70 °C2
Moderna [9]94%mRNA−20 °C2
SputnikV [10]91%Viral vector<=−18 °C2
AstraZeneca [9]70%Viral vector2–8 °C2
Convidecia [11]66%Viral vector2–8 °C1
Janssen [12]76.7–85.4%Viral vector2–8 °C1
CoviVac [12]Inactivate2–8 °C2
Sinopharm [13]79%Inactivate2–8 °C2
CoronaVac/Sinovac [12]50%–91%Inactivate2–8 °C2
Covaxin [12]81%Inactivate2–8 °C2
EpiVacCorona [12]100%Protein2–8 °C2
ZF2001/RBD-Dimer [14]70%–95%Protein2–8 °C3
Novavax [15]89%Protein2–8 °C2
Vaccines have proven to be the most effective and economical way to prevent and control infectious diseases [32]. Although COVID-19 vaccines are highly efficacy enough, herd immunity is required to end the pandemic. Herd immunity can be achieved by vaccination or natural immunization. The fastest way to achieve herd immunity is vaccination. Herd immunity for the COVID-19 disease may vary from country to country because not every individual in the community can be vaccinated (for example, babies, pregnant women, those with medical problems, or those who do not want to be vaccinated). For this reason, reaching the minimum vaccination rate determined in order to achieve herd immunity is important in terms of eliminating the COVID-19 pandemic. The percentage of people who need to be immune to ensure herd immunity varies with each disease. Because this may vary depending on the vaccine, the population, the populations prioritized for vaccination, and other factors [33]. By forecasting the total number of fully vaccinated people by country, it can be observed that approximately how much of the population will be vaccinated and how close the threshold level for herd immunity has been reached. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and properties of vaccines. Various studies on COVID-19 epidemic using ARIMA. Estimating the future values of an observed time series plays an important role in many sciences and engineering fields. The main idea of the ARIMA model is to identify mathematical and statistical theory and then used it to forecast time-series data. Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model is frequently used to predict future values due to its simple structure, flexibility, fast applicability and captures many different patterns [18]. In the past epidemics and health studies, the ARIMA time series model was successfully used [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. ARIMA models are also widely and successfully used for current COVID-19 epidemic research. Some studies using the ARIMA model for the COVID-19 epidemic are given in Table 2.
Table 2

Various studies on COVID-19 epidemic using ARIMA.

Authos(s)ForecastingStudy area
Alzahrani et al. [16]CaseSudi Arabistan
Dehesh et al. [17]CaseChina, Italy, South Korea, Iran, Thailand
Ceylan [18]CaseItaly, Spain, France
Anne [19]CaseIndia
Kumar et al. [20]Case and deathFifteen countries
Tandon et al. [21]CaseEight countries and Asia regions
Ilie et al. [22]CaseNine countries
Kufel [23]CaseSelected European
Sharma [24]CaseIndia
Chaurasia [25]DeathWorld
Argawu [26]CaseTen countries
Lukman et al. [27]CaseSA, Nigeria, Ghana, Egypt
Perone [28]CaseItaly, Russia, USA
Maheshwari et al. [29]Case and deathIndia
Katoch et al. [30]CaseIndia
Kırbaş et al. [31]CaseEight countries
In the literature, there are many studies on estimating the number of COVID-19 cases and/or deaths using the ARIMA models. Nevertheless, there is a gap in the literature in estimating the prevalence trend of the COVID-19 vaccinations by using the ARIMA time series model. The main purpose of this study is to forecast the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World and to analyze whether it has reached a sufficient rate for herd immunity. ARIMA model was used to forecast the future number of fully vaccinated people for selected regions. Thus, the number of vaccinations and vaccine supply plans needed in these regions in the future for herd immunization can be helped. The contributions of this paper are as follows; Date of first fully vaccinated people of the regions and the size of the dataset. Results of the augmented Dickey–Fuller test of the time series data. P0.05 and thus stationary at that level. Performance comparison of candidate ARIMA models for the test dataset. Ljung–Box statistic of selected ARIMA models. Forecasting the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the near future with ARIMA, which is the new approach in the COVID-19 vaccination studies, To identify the most successful ARIMA models in estimating the number of fully vaccinated people against COVID-19 in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World, To forecast the total number of fully vaccinated people in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World in the near future, To determine the people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 rate of the population at the begging of the summer in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World to achieve herd immunity. Number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the examined regions [39].

Material and method

Data collection

In this study, the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America and the World were used to model and validate the ARIMA. The dataset were obtained from the Our World in Data [39]. The datasets used in the study start from the first date of fully vaccinated people against COVID-19 and ends on May 22, 2021. So the number of data varies for each region. The date of the first fully vaccinated people of the investigated regions and data size are given in Table 3.
Table 3

Date of first fully vaccinated people of the regions and the size of the dataset.

RegionDateData size
USJanuary 14, 2021129
AsiaJanuary 04, 2021139
EuropeDecember 27, 2020147
AfricaFebruary 03, 2021109
South AmericaJanuary 13, 2021130
WorldDecember 27, 2020147
(A) Original series, (B) first-order difference series, and (C) second-order difference series. Residuals of ARIMA models. Forecasting of the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 according to ARIMA models. Time series plots for the next 30 days according to best ARIMA models with 80%–95% CI. Populations and COVID-19 information of regions. The ratio of the estimated number of fully vaccinated people in examined regions.

ARIMA model

ARIMA, also known as the Box-Jenkins model, is shown as ARIMA (p, d, q). Parameter p in the model is the order of autoregression, parameter d is the degree of difference, and parameter q is the order of the moving average. The ARIMA model consists of Autoregressive (AR), Moving Average (MA) and “I” stands for integration sections. Three basic ARIMA models for a stationary time series are mathematically representing as follows [40]; Autoregressive model of order p or AR(p) model: Moving-average model of order q or MA(q): Autoregressive moving average model of order p and q or ARMA(p,q): Where, is the autoregression and is the moving average parameters. is the actual value at a time t. is the constant. The random disturbance term is assumed to be white noise which means it is independently identically distributed with mean 0 and a common variance for all terms.

Model selection criteria

Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) criteria were used to select the most successful ARIMA models for the dataset. The AIC shows how well the model fits the observed series. The most suitable model for the dataset is that have smallest AIC, RMSE and MAPE value [41]. These performance criteria can be calculated by using Eqs. (4), (5), (6), respectively. Where, L is the likelihood function, m is the total number of parameters in the model. Where, p is the predicted value, a is the actual value. It is desirable for the above three error measurement criteria to be lower. Error is zero indicates that it is a statistically perfect model.

Results

Vaccination has started to be administered in countries on different dates. Until May 22, 2021, 129.01 million in the US, 96.56 million in Asia, 105.92 million in Europe, 33.95 million in South America, 6.84 million in Africa, and 388.60 million people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the World (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in the examined regions [39].

The process of ARIMA modeling consists of four consecutive steps: identification of model, parameters estimation, diagnostic checking, and forecasting. In the first step, it is identified whether the time series variable is stationary and non-stationary. If the series is non-stationary, it is converted to stationary. Time-series graphs are given in Fig. 2 to observe the stationarity of the dataset. Original time-series graphs are shown in Fig. 2 A. It is seen that there is an upward trend in all regions examined, that is, the original series is non-stationary. Therefore, the first-order difference was applied to the original data to stabilize the mean of the people fully vaccinated against COVID-19. The first-order difference of the series is shown in Fig. 3B. When the first-difference series are examined, trends of all series still observed, so the second-order difference was applied. As seen in Fig. 2C, after the second-order difference was taken, all series became stationary. Augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) test was applied to confirm the stationarity of the time series and the results are given in Table 4. ADF test results also show that the time series stabilize after the second difference was taken. This shows us that the parameter d is 2 in the ARIMA model.
Fig. 2

(A) Original series, (B) first-order difference series, and (C) second-order difference series.

Fig. 3

Residuals of ARIMA models.

Table 4

Results of the augmented Dickey–Fuller test of the time series data.

RegionDataDickey–Fullerp-value
UsOriginal−1.0480.735
First-ordered−1.3480.607
Second-ordered−6.2490.000

AsiaOriginal0.1320.968
First-ordered−1.1940.676
Second-ordered−10.1300.000

EuropeOriginal3.7901.000
First-ordered2.1690.998
Second-ordered−5.5380.000

AfricaOriginal0.1990.972
First-ordered−2.7860.060
Second-ordered−9.1390.000

South AmericaOriginal3.7901.000
First-ordered2.1690.998
Second-ordered−5.5370.000

WorldOriginal−1.1820.681
First-ordered−0.6550.858
Second-ordered−7.2340.000

P0.05 and thus stationary at that level.

Candidate ARIMA models’ test results are given in Table 5. ARIMA models with minimum AIC, RMSE and MAPE criteria were chosen as the best models. Accordingly, the ARIMA(5,2,2), ARIMA(1,2,3), ARIMA(5,2,0), ARIMA(2,1,2), ARIMA(2,2,1) and ARIMA(0,2,2) models were selected for the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America and the World, respectively. The selected ARIMA models fitted the data reasonably well with a minimum MAPE = 1.27, MAPE = 4.80, MAPE = 4.24, MAPE= 11.32, MAPE = 0.90, and MAPE values.
Table 5

Performance comparison of candidate ARIMA models for the test dataset.

RegionCandidate modelsAICRMSEMAPESelected model
USARIMA (2,2,2)360333307482.38ARIMA (5,2,2)
ARIMA (1,2,0)362631519142.26
ARIMA (0,2,1)361736518312.62
ARIMA (1,2,2)360232725852.32
ARIMA (0,2,2)360333498632.38
ARIMA (1,2,1)360132995272.35
ARIMA (2,2,1)360031939712.25
ARIMA (2,2,0)362830603942.20
ARIMA (3,2,1)356026784141.83
ARIMA (3,2,0)359433733092.39
ARIMA (4,2,1)355825361761.72
ARIMA (4,2,0)357532651232.28
ARIMA (5,2,1)355422346251.48
ARIMA (5,2,0)355923989721.60
ARIMA (5,2,2)355219640991.27
ARIMA (4,2,1)355325361761.72
ARIMA (5,2,3)355419833221.29
ARIMA (4,2,3)355519968551.30

AsiaARIMA (2,2,2)396645089094.81ARIMA (1,2,3)
ARIMA (0,2,0)40101361965414.08
ARIMA (1,2,0)39921251871812.97
ARIMA (0,2,1)396444808954.77
ARIMA (1,2,1)396345402814.84
ARIMA (2,2,1)396445133664.81
ARIMA (1,2,2)396444751244.77
ARIMA (0,2,2)396345211024.82
ARIMA (0,2,3)396545160044.81
ARIMA (1,2,3)396645036604.80

EuropeARIMA (2,2,2)404163724845.78ARIMA (5,2,0)
ARIMA (0,2,0)408774429146.77
ARIMA (1,2,0)408580845737.37
ARIMA (0,2,1)408060170865.45
ARIMA (1,2,2)406263648205.77
ARIMA (2,2,1)406062216685.64
ARIMA (3,2,2)403648167914.29
ARIMA (3,2,1)405257596155.19
ARIMA (4,2,1)403452194944.66
ARIMA (4,2,0)405552194944.66
ARIMA (5,2,1)403050758434.52
ARIMA (5,2,0)346847835874.24

AfricaARIMA (2,2,2)216182423911.33ARIMA (2,2,1)
ARIMA (0,2,0)218895050413.17
ARIMA (1,2,0)217093271312.91
ARIMA (0,2,1)215582372511.32
ARIMA (1,2,1)215782356611.32
ARIMA (2,2,1)215982348811.32
ARIMA (1,2,2)215982356811.32
ARIMA (0,2,2)245782344811.32

South AmericaARIMA (2,2,2)34653221420.91ARIMA (1,2,1)
ARIMA (0,2,0)3529408558311.56
ARIMA (1,2,0)3528387874310.97
ARIMA (0,2,1)34934719561.22
ARIMA (1,2,2)34794003171.07
ARIMA (2,2,1)34707710822.06
ARIMA (2,2,2)34673221420.91
ARIMA (1,2,1)34883274300.90
ARIMA (1,2,3)34725333161.51
ARIMA (3,2,1)34708516192.36
ARIMA (3,2,3)34683645521.02

WorldARIMA (0,2,0)4352262463146.57ARIMA (5,2,1)
ARIMA (1,2,0)4344229648055.76
ARIMA (0,2,1)433290172662.32
ARIMA (1,2,1)432191787062.37
ARIMA (2,2,1)432291631232.36
ARIMA (1,2,2)432391722762.37
ARIMA (0,2,2)432288699822.29
ARIMA (2,2,0)4345208280625.23
ARIMA (4,2,0)307093217562.37
ARIMA (4,2,1)369656852081.46
ARIMA (5,2,0)369868056961.74
ARIMA (5,2,1)369354122851.39
ARIMA (5,2,2)369057240021.46
The ACF and PACF graphs of the residuals for the best fitted ARIMA models are presented in Fig. 3. The ACF determine whether the previous value in the series is related to the following value. The PACF shows the amount of correlation between a variable and a lag of itself. When ACF and PACF graphs are examined, it is seen that the residuals generally do not exceed significant boundaries. Box–Ljung test was used to check the residuals are white noise or not. The null hypothesis () for a Box–Ljung test is the residuals are independently distributed. Therefore, it is desirable to reject the null hypothesis. Large -value indicate that the residuals have no remaining autocorrelations, i.e., they resemble white noise. Box–Ljung test results of models are given in Table 6.
Table 6

Ljung–Box statistic of selected ARIMA models.

Modelχ2dfp-value
USARIMA(5,2,2)10.55180.91
AsiaARIMA(1,2,3)24.15180.15
EuropeARIMA(5,2,0)22.26180.22
AfricaARIMA(2,2,1)21.09180.27
South AmericaARIMA(1,2,1)27.54180.07
WorldARIMA(5,2,1)24.64190.17
Fig. 3 shows that the residuals are white noise since all the autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation coefficients are small and within two standard deviations at a 5% level of significance. Also, by Ljung–Box statistic results correlations are not significant and hence the residuals are white noise. With these best models determined, the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was forecasted with 80%–95% confidence intervals (CI) (Fig. 4). Forecasting of the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 for the next ten days according to ARIMA models is given in Table 7.
Fig. 4

Time series plots for the next 30 days according to best ARIMA models with 80%–95% CI.

Table 7

Forecasting of the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 according to ARIMA models.

DateUSAsiaEuropeAfricaSouth AmericaWorld
ForecastForecastForecastForecastForecastForecast
23.05.2021130.033 M97.761 M107.840 M6.953 M34.325 M393.781 M
24.05.2021130.923 M99.004 M109.760 M7.081 M34.729 M399.043 M
25.05.2021131.749 M100.246 M111.856 M7.193 M35.140 M404.305 M
26.05.2021132.680 M101.488 M114.175 M7.313 M35.553 M409.568 M
27.05.2021133.755 M102.730 M116.558 M7.423 M35.967 M414.830 M
28.05.2021134.941 M103.973 M118.901 M7.537 M36.381 M420.093 M
29.05.2021136.099 M105.215 M121.062 M7.644 M36.794 M425.355 M
30.05.2021137.144 M106.457 M123.110 M7.753 M37.208 M430.617 M
31.05.2021138.059 M107.700 M125.167 M7.856 M37.622 M435.880 M
1.06.2021138.939 M108.942 M127.323 M7.961 M38.036 M441.142 M

Discussions

The main purpose of this study is to determine the full vaccination rate in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World on June 1, 2021. For this purpose, the number of fully vaccinated people in these regions was forecasted using the ARIMA time series model. Thus, they will be able to observe how far countries are from the threshold level required to achieve herd immunity. With the determined ARIMA models, the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 was estimated on June 1, 2021. The populations, vaccination information, and the forecasted number of full vaccination people of the regions examined in this study are given in Table 8. Almost all countries desire to administer vaccines to at least 50% of their population until the beginning of the summer. This seems unlikely based on the total number of full vaccinated people estimated by ARIMA models. The ratio of the number of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 to the population of the examined regions on June 1, 2021 is shown in Fig. 5.
Table 8

Populations and COVID-19 information of regions.

Region2021 populationPeople fully vaccinated (22.05.2021)People fully vaccinated % (22.05.2021)Forecasted people fully vaccinated (01.06.2021)
US332.77 M129.01 M38.76138.94 M
Asia4.68 B96.56 M2.06108.94 M
Europe748.05 M105.92 M14.16127.32 M
Africa1.37 B6.84 M0.507.96 M
South America433.99 M33.95 M7.8238.04 M
World7.87 B388.60 M4.93441.14 M
Fig. 5

The ratio of the estimated number of fully vaccinated people in examined regions.

According to the estimation results of ARIMA models, about 139 million, 109 million, 127 million, 8 million, 38 million, and 441 million people will be fully vaccinated in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World, respectively (on June 1, 2021). The 2021 population of these regions are 333 million, 4.68 billion, 748 million, 1.37 billion, 434 million, and 7.87 billion, respectively. On June 1, 2021, it is predicted that fully vaccinated to 41.8% of the people in the US, 2.3% in Asia, 17% in Europe, 0.6% in Africa, 8.8% in South America, and 5.6% in the World. According to the findings obtained as a result of the study, the US reaches the highest level in the fully vaccinated rate on June 1, 2021. Nevertheless, none of the examined regions will reach the herd immunity threshold until June 1, 2021. These days when the numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths are at their peak again, the health systems of many countries have collapsed and they have started to impose curfews again. In addition to the tragic deaths, prohibitions affect the country’s economies negatively. To prevent all these negativities, it is thought that vaccination rates should reach quickly the threshold level required to provide herd immunity. Vaccination rates in Fig. 5 show that high-income countries should provide vaccines and healthcare support to low and middle-income countries. In addition, vaccine companies need to make plans to increase vaccine production rates, and countries to provide more vaccines and to apply vaccines quickly. Nevertheless, it has been reported that some mutant viruses are able to vaccine-escaped and antibody-resistant [42]. The rise of new variants may require the monitoring of immune escape variants, force second-generation production that addresses globally circulating variants, and already vaccinated people may be again vaccinated.

Conclusion

SARS-Cov-2 virus, which causes COVID-19 disease, is highly contagious. All countries quickly started vaccination development after the coronavirus was declared a global emergency by WHO. Up to now, more than ten COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for use. Although the efficacy of these vaccines is quite high, herd immunity is required to safely slow or stop the COVID-19 epidemic. The fastest way to achieve herd immunity is vaccination. In this study, the total number of full vaccination people against COVID-19 in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World on the next ten days was estimated using the ARIMA time series method. ARIMA models have been formulated with different parameters and the most successful models have been selected. AIC, RMSE, and MAPE criteria were used to compare model success. Models with the lowest values were selected to estimate the number of vaccines to be administered in the future. ARIMA(5,2,2), ARIMA(1,2,3), ARIMA(5,2,0), ARIMA(2,2,1), ARIMA(1,2,1) and ARIMA(5,2,1) models were selected for the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World, respectively. The selected ARIMA models fitted the data reasonably well with a minimum MAPE = 1.27, MAPE = 4.80, MAPE = 4.24, MAPE = 11.32, MAPE = 0.90, and MAPE values. According to the results of this study, on June 1, 2021, in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and, the World of 139 million, 109 million, 127 million, 8 million, 38 million, and 441 million people will be fully vaccinated, respectively. This result shows that beginning of the summer, 41.8%, 2.3%, 17%, 0.6%, 8.8%, and 5.6% of people will be fully vaccinated in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World, respectively. It has been observed that the other regions except the US are quite far from the herd immunity threshold level. The future goal of our study is to forecast the number of fully vaccinated people in the future with deep learning time series models. Thus, the performances of the ARIMA model can be compared with the deep learning methods.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Pınar Cihan: Writing – original draft, methodology, software, validation, visualization, Writing – review and editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  27 in total

1.  Dosing debates, transparency issues roil vaccine rollouts.

Authors:  Jon Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Drug treatment options for the 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV).

Authors:  Hongzhou Lu
Journal:  Biosci Trends       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.400

3.  Using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to predict and monitor the number of beds occupied during a SARS outbreak in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.

Authors:  Arul Earnest; Mark I Chen; Donald Ng; Leo Yee Sin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Estimation of COVID-19 prevalence in Italy, Spain, and France.

Authors:  Zeynep Ceylan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK.

Authors:  Merryn Voysey; Sue Ann Costa Clemens; Shabir A Madhi; Lily Y Weckx; Pedro M Folegatti; Parvinder K Aley; Brian Angus; Vicky L Baillie; Shaun L Barnabas; Qasim E Bhorat; Sagida Bibi; Carmen Briner; Paola Cicconi; Andrea M Collins; Rachel Colin-Jones; Clare L Cutland; Thomas C Darton; Keertan Dheda; Christopher J A Duncan; Katherine R W Emary; Katie J Ewer; Lee Fairlie; Saul N Faust; Shuo Feng; Daniela M Ferreira; Adam Finn; Anna L Goodman; Catherine M Green; Christopher A Green; Paul T Heath; Catherine Hill; Helen Hill; Ian Hirsch; Susanne H C Hodgson; Alane Izu; Susan Jackson; Daniel Jenkin; Carina C D Joe; Simon Kerridge; Anthonet Koen; Gaurav Kwatra; Rajeka Lazarus; Alison M Lawrie; Alice Lelliott; Vincenzo Libri; Patrick J Lillie; Raburn Mallory; Ana V A Mendes; Eveline P Milan; Angela M Minassian; Alastair McGregor; Hazel Morrison; Yama F Mujadidi; Anusha Nana; Peter J O'Reilly; Sherman D Padayachee; Ana Pittella; Emma Plested; Katrina M Pollock; Maheshi N Ramasamy; Sarah Rhead; Alexandre V Schwarzbold; Nisha Singh; Andrew Smith; Rinn Song; Matthew D Snape; Eduardo Sprinz; Rebecca K Sutherland; Richard Tarrant; Emma C Thomson; M Estée Török; Mark Toshner; David P J Turner; Johan Vekemans; Tonya L Villafana; Marion E E Watson; Christopher J Williams; Alexander D Douglas; Adrian V S Hill; Teresa Lambe; Sarah C Gilbert; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  The COVID-19 Vaccines: Recent Development, Challenges and Prospects.

Authors:  Yuxin Yan; Yoongxin Pang; Zhuoyi Lyu; Ruiqi Wang; Xinyun Wu; Chong You; Haitao Zhao; Sivakumar Manickam; Edward Lester; Tao Wu; Cheng Heng Pang
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 7.  Virology, Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Control of COVID-19.

Authors:  Yuefei Jin; Haiyan Yang; Wangquan Ji; Weidong Wu; Shuaiyin Chen; Weiguo Zhang; Guangcai Duan
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 8.  Target Product Profile Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Clinical Trials and Beyond: An Early 2021 Perspective.

Authors:  Colin D Funk; Craig Laferrière; Ali Ardakani
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.048

View more
  17 in total

1.  Rational identification of small molecules derived from 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene as potential inhibitors of 3CLpro enzyme for COVID-19 therapy: a computer-aided drug design approach.

Authors:  Ossama Daoui; Souad Elkhattabi; Samir Chtita
Journal:  Struct Chem       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 1.795

2.  Contingency Management and SARS-CoV-2 Testing Among People Who Inject Drugs.

Authors:  Camille C Cioffi; Derek Kosty; Christopher G Capron; Hannah F Tavalire; Robert C Barnes; Anne Marie Mauricio
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Recommendation and Roadmap of Mass Vaccination against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Bangladesh as a Lower-Middle-Income Country.

Authors:  M J Hossain; S M A Rahman; T B Emran; S Mitra; M R Islam; K Dhama
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-12-30

4.  Prediction intervals of the COVID-19 cases by HAR models with growth rates and vaccination rates in top eight affected countries: Bootstrap improvement.

Authors:  Eunju Hwang
Journal:  Chaos Solitons Fractals       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.944

5.  Psychological Distress Among Occupational Health Professionals During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Spain: Description and Effect of Work Engagement and Work Environment.

Authors:  Carlos Ruiz-Frutos; Mónica Ortega-Moreno; Guillermo Soriano-Tarín; Macarena Romero-Martín; Regina Allande-Cussó; Juan Luis Cabanillas-Moruno; Juan Gómez-Salgado
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Evaluating Rates and Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy for Adults and Children in the Singapore Population: Strengthening Our Community's Resilience against Threats from Emerging Infections (SOCRATEs) Cohort.

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Kevin Y K Tan; Frederick H F Chan; Ramanathan Periakaruppan; Brenda W L Ong; Alexius S E Soh; Mark Ic Chen
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30

7.  A novel ensemble fuzzy classification model in SARS-CoV-2 B-cell epitope identification for development of protein-based vaccine.

Authors:  Zeynep Banu Ozger; Pınar Cihan
Journal:  Appl Soft Comput       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Biologic Therapies in Kuwait: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Shehab; Yasmin Zurba; Ali Al Abdulsalam; Ahmad Alfadhli; Sara Elouali
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31

9.  Comparison of Rapid Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for SARS-CoV-2 Detection by RT-qPCR.

Authors:  Lívia Mara Silva; Lorena Rodrigues Riani; Marcelo Silva Silvério; Olavo Dos Santos Pereira-Júnior; Frederico Pittella
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-27

10.  Forecasting the COVID-19 vaccine uptake rate: an infodemiological study in the US.

Authors:  Xingzuo Zhou; Yiang Li
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.