| Literature DB >> 34304715 |
Jin-Shu Pang1, Dong-Yue Wen1, Rong-Quan He2, Gang Chen3, Peng Lin1, Jin-Hong Li1, Yu-Jia Zhao1, Lin-Yong Wu1, Jun-Hong Chen4, Yun He1, Li-Ting Qin3, Jia-Bo Chen5, Yong Li5, Hong Yang1.
Abstract
Hepatoblastoma is a kind of extreme malignancy frequently diagnosed in children. Although surgical resection is considered as the first-line treatment for hepatoblastoma, a relatively large population of patients have lost the preferred opportunity for surgery. Administration of locoregional ablation enables local tumor control but with the deficiency of insufficient ablation, residual tumor, and rapid progression. In this study, we integrated 219 hepatoblastoma and 121 non-cancer liver tissues to evaluate the expression of NR2F6, from which a higher NR2F6 level was found in hepatoblastoma compared with non-cancer livers with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 1.04 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.29). The overexpression of NR2F6 also appeared to be an efficient indicator in distinguishing hepatoblastoma tissues from non-cancer liver tissues from the indication of a summarized AUC of 0.90, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.76 and a pooled specificity of 0.89. Interestingly, nude mouse xenografts provided direct evidence that overexpressed NR2F6 was also detected in residual tumor compared to untreated hepatoblastoma. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-binding data in HepG2 cells and transcriptome analysis of HepG2 xenografts were combined to identify target genes regulated by NR2F6. We finally selected 150 novel target genes of NR2F6 in residual tumor of incomplete ablation, and these genes appeared to be associated with the biological regulation of lipid metabolism-related pathway. Accordingly, targeting NR2F6 holds a therapeutic promise in treating residual recurrent hepatoblastoma after incomplete ablation.Entities:
Keywords: NR2F6; ablation; hepatoblastoma; overexpression; residual tumor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34304715 PMCID: PMC8806681 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1945521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Included studies for evaluation of differentially expressed genes in hepatoblastoma
| Datasets | Update Year | Country | Methods | Ca. N | Ca. | Ca. SD | Ctal. N | Ctal. Mean | Ctal. SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-MEXP-1852 | 2014 | France | Microarray | 25 | 7.69 | 0.4617 | 4 | 7.51 | 0.2781 |
| GSE104766 | 2019 | France | RNA-seq | 30 | 4.23 | 0.7728 | 30 | 3.38 | 0.6832 |
| GSE131329 | 2019 | Japan | Microarray | 53 | 10.3 | 0.6151 | 14 | 9.61 | 0.4076 |
| GSE132037 | 2020 | Spain | Microarray | 34 | 9.19 | 0.4928 | 18 | 8.86 | 0.2342 |
| GSE133039 | 2020 | Spain | RNA-seq | 33 | 4.87 | 1.0734 | 32 | 3.98 | 0.4945 |
| GSE151347 | 2020 | Germany | RNA-seq | 11 | 7.73 | 0.7281 | 11 | 6.43 | 0.3717 |
| GSE81928 | 2019 | USA | RNA-seq | 23 | 6.63 | 0.8835 | 9 | 5.79 | 0.8992 |
| GSE89775 | 2019 | USA | RNA-seq | 10 | 9.93 | 0.9598 | 3 | 9.22 | 1.052 |
Figure 1.NR2F6 expression between hepatoblastoma and normal livers in per studies
Figure 2.The overall evaluation of NR2F6 expression. (a) The pooled level of NR2F6 expression between hepatoblastoma and normal livers with 440 samples and detection of publication bias of Begg’s (b) and Egger’s plots (c)
Figure 3.ROC curves indicating the latent value of NR2F6 in the diagnosis of hepatoblastoma in per studies
Figure 4.The overall evaluation of latently diagnostic value of NR2F6 in hepatoblastoma. (a) Summarized ROC curve with 440 samples and pooled forest plots of sensitivity (b) and specificity (c) in distinguishing hepatoblastoma and normal livers, as well as the odds ratio of NR2F6 between hepatoblastoma and normal livers
Figure 5.Determination of potential targets in residual hepatoblastoma after incomplete ablation. (a) ablation-treated model group (T, N = 4) and normal untreated group (N, N = 4); (b) differentially expressed analysis of ablation-treated model and untreated group; (c) an upregulated tendency of NR2F6 expression induced by incomplete ablation; (d) selection of potential targets using 4 datasets of ChIP-seq detection in liver cancer HepG2 cells; and (e) the latent targets regulated by NR2F6 in residual hepatoblastoma treated by incomplete ablation
Figure 6.The heatmap displaying the level of 150 potential targets regulated by NR2F6 in residual hepatoblastoma after incomplete ablation. Note: the ‘test’ represents the ablation-treated model group, and ‘Ctal’ indicates the untreated group
Figure 7.Molecular mechanism for the 150 potential targets regulated by NR2F6 in residual hepatoblastoma after incomplete ablation. (a) Gene ontology analysis, including biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, (b) interactions of biological processes, as well as KEGG (c) and reactome (d) pathway analysis
Pathway analysis for the 150 potential targets regulated by NR2F6 in ablation-treated residual tumor of hepatoblastoma
| Geneset | Terms | Overlap | P-value | Symbol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hsa04976 | Bile secretion | 5 | 0.000 | NR0B2;SCARB1;SLC22A1;SLC22A7; |
| hsa05205 | Proteoglycans in cancer | 6 | 0.009 | VAV2;ERBB3;RPS6KB2;GPC3;HSPG2; |
| hsa04979 | Cholesterol metabolism | 3 | 0.010 | APOE;SCARB1;CETP |
| hsa00053 | Ascorbate and adorate metabolism | 2 | 0.025 | RGN;UGT2B7 |
| hsa01100 | Metabolic pathways | 18 | 0.039 | AHCY;GGT1;AKR1D1;GALNT11; |
| R-HSA-975,634 | Retinoid metabolism and transport | 5 | 0.000 | APOE;TTR;APOM;GPC3;HSPG2 |
| R-HSA-6,806,667 | Metabolism of fat-soluble vitamins | 5 | 0.000 | APOE;TTR;APOM;GPC3;HSPG2 |
| R-HSA-2,187,338 | Visual phototransduction | 6 | 0.000 | APOE;TTR;APOM;GPC3;HSPG2;RDH5 |
| R-HSA-166,663 | Initial triggering of complement | 3 | 0.001 | COLEC11;GZMM;C1S |
| R-HSA-6,806,942 | MET Receptor Activation | 2 | 0.001 | HPN;HGFAC |
| R-HSA-196,854 | Metabolism of vitamins and cofactors | 7 | 0.002 | APOE;TTR;APOM;FPGS;GPC3;HSPG2; |
| R-HSA-8,964,058 | HDL remodeling | 2 | 0.004 | APOE;CETP |
| R-HSA-174,824 | Plasma lipoprotein assembly, remodeling, and clearance | 4 | 0.004 | APOE;SCARB1;CETP;PRKACA |
| R-HSA-8,866,907 | Activation of the TFAP2 (AP-2) family of transcription factors | 2 | 0.006 | CITED2;YEATS4 |
| R-HSA-8,864,260 | Transcriptional regulation by the AP-2 (TFAP2) family of transcription factors | 3 | 0.006 | APOE;CITED2;YEATS4 |
Figure 8.Validation for the targets of NR2F6 involved in KEGG pathway of bile secretion