Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: electroreceptor physiology.

Responses of ampullary and tuberous electroreceptor afferents were studied using moving electrolocation targets and electrical modulations of the animal's electric organ discharge as stimuli. The ability of the electroreceptors to encode these stimuli was measured with and without various forms of electrical jamming signals. The goal of this study was to measure the deterioration in electroreceptor responses due to the jamming signals, and to compare these results with the behavioral measures of electrolocation under the same conditions of jamming as described in the preceding report (Bastian 1987). 1. Three types of jamming stimuli were used to interfere with the tuberous electroreceptor afferents' ability to respond to the test stimuli mentioned above: Broad-band noise, high frequency stimuli consisting of a sinusoidal waveform having a frequency maintained at a chosen difference frequency (DF) from the EOD frequency of the fish being studied, and 5 or 50 Hz sinusoidal stimuli. 2. The tuberous receptor afferents' spontaneous frequency was sensitive to continuous presentation of all but the 5 Hz jamming signals. The 4 Hz DF signal caused the largest increase in spontaneous activity, the 50 Hz stimulus was intermediate in effectiveness, and the noise stimulus caused the smallest increase. Estimates of the variability of the ongoing receptor activity were also made, and both the 4 Hz DF and the 50 Hz stimuli reduced the coefficient of variation of the receptor activity, but noise had no significant effect on this parameter. Noise, 4 Hz DF, and 50 Hz jamming signals also reduced the tuberous receptors' responses to a 100 ms EOD amplitude modulation, and the 5 Hz stimulus was again ineffective. 3. Noise and 4 Hz DF jamming were also effective in reducing tuberous receptor afferents' responses to a moving metal electrolocation target. The 4 Hz DF stimulus was most effective in reducing the receptor's ability to encode information about the target. Receptor responses showed about a three-fold larger decrease per 10 dB increase in DF jamming amplitude as compared to similar sized increases in noise amplitude. Threshold target distances were also determined with and without noise and DF jamming, and again, the noise stimulus was less effective in reducing the distance at which electrolocation targets were just detectable. 4. Recordings from ampullary receptor afferents confirmed that the galvanic potentials produced by metal electrolocation targets stimulate these receptors while EOD distortions caused by such objects probably do not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)