Shade Horn1, Jacky L Snoep1,2, David D van Niekerk3. 1. Department of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa. 2. Molecular Cell Physiology, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa. ddvniekerk@sun.ac.za.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The fidelity and reliability of disease model predictions depend on accurate and precise descriptions of processes and determination of parameters. Various models exist to describe within-host dynamics during malaria infection but there is a shortage of clinical data that can be used to quantitatively validate them and establish confidence in their predictions. In addition, model parameters often contain a degree of uncertainty and show variations between individuals, potentially undermining the reliability of model predictions. In this study models were reproduced and analysed by means of robustness, uncertainty, local sensitivity and local sensitivity robustness analysis to establish confidence in their predictions. RESULTS: Components of the immune system are responsible for the most uncertainty in model outputs, while disease associated variables showed the greatest sensitivity for these components. All models showed a comparable degree of robustness but displayed different ranges in their predictions. In these different ranges, sensitivities were well-preserved in three of the four models. CONCLUSION: Analyses of the effects of parameter variations in models can provide a comparative tool for the evaluation of model predictions. In addition, it can assist in uncovering model weak points and, in the case of disease models, be used to identify possible points for therapeutic intervention.
BACKGROUND: The fidelity and reliability of disease model predictions depend on accurate and precise descriptions of processes and determination of parameters. Various models exist to describe within-host dynamics during malaria infection but there is a shortage of clinical data that can be used to quantitatively validate them and establish confidence in their predictions. In addition, model parameters often contain a degree of uncertainty and show variations between individuals, potentially undermining the reliability of model predictions. In this study models were reproduced and analysed by means of robustness, uncertainty, local sensitivity and local sensitivity robustness analysis to establish confidence in their predictions. RESULTS: Components of the immune system are responsible for the most uncertainty in model outputs, while disease associated variables showed the greatest sensitivity for these components. All models showed a comparable degree of robustness but displayed different ranges in their predictions. In these different ranges, sensitivities were well-preserved in three of the four models. CONCLUSION: Analyses of the effects of parameter variations in models can provide a comparative tool for the evaluation of model predictions. In addition, it can assist in uncovering model weak points and, in the case of disease models, be used to identify possible points for therapeutic intervention.
Authors: Sean C Murphy; Joseph P Shott; Sunil Parikh; Paige Etter; William R Prescott; V Ann Stewart Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Ellie Sherrard-Smith; Janetta E Skarp; Andrew D Beale; Christen Fornadel; Laura C Norris; Sarah J Moore; Selam Mihreteab; Jacques Derek Charlwood; Samir Bhatt; Peter Winskill; Jamie T Griffin; Thomas S Churcher Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 11.205