Literature DB >> 34302467

Exploring "Return to Productivity" Among People Living With Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Report.

Clifford C Sheckter1,2, Sabina Brych3, Gretchen J Carrougher3, Steven E Wolf4, Jeffrey C Schneider5, Nicole Gibran3, Barclay T Stewart3,6.   

Abstract

Burn survivors experience barriers to returning to work. For those who do return to work, little is known regarding whether they achieve preinjury productivity (i.e., equivalent or gain in income compared to preinjury income). Identifying patients at risk of not achieving preinjury productivity is important for targeting services that support this population. They extracted occupational and income data through 24 months postinjury from the multicenter, longitudinal Burn Model System National Database. Annual income was reported in six groups: <$25k, $25k-50k, $50k-99k, $100k-149k, $150k-199k, and $>199k. Participants were classified by change in income at each follow-up (i.e., gain, loss, and equivalent). Explanatory variables included demographics, injury characteristics, insurance payer, employment status, and job type. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression was used to model return to productivity. Four hundred fifty-three participants provided complete income data at discharge and follow-up. Of the 302 participants employed preinjury, 180 (60%) returned to work within 24 months postinjury. Less than half (138) returned to productivity (46% of participants employed preinjury; 77% of those who returned to work). Characteristics associated with return to productivity included older age (median 46.9 vs 45.9 years, OR 1.03, P = .006), Hispanic ethnicity (24% vs 11%, OR 1.80, P = 0.041), burn size >20% TBSA (33.7% vs 33.0%, OR 2.09, P = 0.045), and postinjury employment (54% vs 26%, OR 3.41, P < 0.001). More than half of employed people living with burn injury experienced loss in productivity within 24 months postinjury. Even if they return to work, people living with burn injuries face challenges returning to productivity and may benefit from vocational rehabilitation and/or financial assistance.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34302467      PMCID: PMC9255661          DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.819


  14 in total

Review 1.  Time off work and return to work rates after burns: systematic review of the literature and a large two-center series.

Authors:  S B Brych; L H Engrav; F P Rivara; J T Ptacek; D C Lezotte; P C Esselman; K J Kowalske; N S Gibran
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

2.  Underemployment in America: measurement and evidence.

Authors:  Leif Jensen; Tim Slack
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2003-09

3.  An Intervention Bundle to Facilitate Return to Work for Burn-Injured Workers: Report From a Burn Model System Investigation.

Authors:  Gretchen J Carrougher; Sabina B Brych; Tam N Pham; Samuel P Mandell; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  Functional and occupational outcome in patients surviving massive burns.

Authors:  J Xiao; B R Cai
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Return to work after specialised burn care: A two-year prospective follow-up study of the prevalence, predictors and related costs.

Authors:  H Goei; M J Hop; C H van der Vlies; M K Nieuwenhuis; S Polinder; E Middelkoop; M E van Baar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Burn morbidity: a followup study of physical and psychological disability.

Authors:  F C Chang; B Herzog
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System: Twenty Years of Contributions to Clinical Service and Research.

Authors:  Jeremy Goverman; Katie Mathews; Radha K Holavanahalli; Andrew Vardanian; David N Herndon; Walter J Meyer; Karen Kowalske; Jim Fauerbach; Nicole S Gibran; Gretchen J Carrougher; Dagmar Amtmann; Jeffrey C Schneider; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.819

8.  Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury.

Authors:  Leda F Espinoza; Laura C Simko; Richard Goldstein; Kara A McMullen; Chloe Slocum; Julie K Silver; David N Herndon; Oscar E Suman; Walter J Meyer; Nicole S Gibran; Karen Kowalske; Ross Zafonte; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  Fatigue Following Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Study.

Authors:  Laura C Simko; Leda F Espinoza; Kara McMullen; David N Herndon; Oscar Suman; James A Fauerbach; Karen Kowalske; Shelley Wiechman; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 1.819

10.  Predictors of functional independence, quality of life, and return to work in patients with burn injuries in mainland China.

Authors:  Dan Tang; Cecilia W P Li-Tsang; Ricky K C Au; Xia Shen; Kui-Cheng Li; Xian-Feng Yi; Lin-Rong Liao; Hai-Yan Cao; Ya-Nan Feng; Chuan-Shun Liu
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-11-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Peer Support Groups: Identifying Disparities to Improve Participation.

Authors:  Erin E Ross; Rachel A Colbath; Jeremy Yu; Naikhoba Munabi; T Justin Gillenwater; Haig A Yenikomshian
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.