Literature DB >> 34302203

Comparative Evaluation of Physical Characteristics and Preclinical Data of a Novel Monodisperse Polycaprolactone Microspheres Filler.

Hyunsuk Oh1, Sangno Lee1, Jungtae Na2, Beom Joon Kim3, Ju Hee Kim4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Demand for dermal fillers has been increasing gradually over the past decade. Polycaprolactone (PCL) fillers, a biodegradable polymer, not only naturally maintain the volume of the skin, but also stimulate collagen production by microsphere. However, inflammation can be caused by several factors such as large diameters, non-uniformity, uneven surfaces and non-spherical shapes of microspheres in use. Thus, a filler using microspheres with a uniform diameter of more than 20 μm and spherical shape was developed.
OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of newly monodisperse polycaprolactone microspheres fillers, IVL-F001 with smaller microsphere size and better morphology against a conventional commercial PCL filler.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The morphology and diameters of microsphere included in IVL-F001 and the PCL filler were analyzed, and the viscoelasticity and inject ability of both fillers were examined. After intradermal injection to hairless mice, the durability and efficacy of both fillers were evaluated through PRIMOSLITE and Folliscope for 24 weeks. Histology was performed to assess the biocompatibility, inflammation, and collagen synthesis.
RESULTS: Microspheres of IVL-F001 demonstrated a narrow size distribution with average diameter of 34.16 μm and distribution of 4.11. The level of injection force was low and the elasticity (G') was high compared to the licensed PCL filler. In the histopathological evaluation, IVL-F001 had significantly lower inflammatory reactions and higher collagen synthesis compared to the licensed PCL filler.
CONCLUSION: These data indicated that IVL-F001 has lower inflammatory reaction and improved persistence compared with commercial PCL filler. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dermal filler; Immunity; Microsphere; Polycaprolactone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34302203     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02470-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  2 in total

Review 1.  Hyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging.

Authors:  Fredric S Brandt; Alex Cazzaniga
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 2.  Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches.

Authors:  David Funt; Tatjana Pavicic
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2013-12-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.