Literature DB >> 34302036

Changes in the use patterns of bDMARDs in patients with rheumatic diseases over the past 13 years.

Carlos Sánchez-Piedra1, Diana Sueiro-Delgado2, Javier García-González3, Inmaculada Ros-Vilamajo4, Agueda Prior-Español5, Manuel José Moreno-Ramos6, Blanca Garcia-Magallon7, Jerusalen Calvo-Gutiérrez8, Yanira Perez-Vera9, Raquel Martín-Domenech10, Dolores Ruiz-Montesino11, Paloma Vela-Casasempere12, Lorena Expósito13, Fernando Sánchez-Alonso1, Enrique González-Davila14, Federico Díaz-González15,16.   

Abstract

The better understanding of the safety of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), as well as the emergence of new bDMARDs against different therapeutic targets and biosimilars have likely influenced the use patterns of these compounds over time. The aim of this study is to assess changes in demographic characteristics, disease activity and treatment patterns in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who started a first- or second-line biologic between 2007 and mid-2020. Patients diagnosed with RA, PsA or AS included in the BIOBADASER registry from January 2007 to July 2020 were included. According to the start date of a first- or second-line biologic therapy, patients were stratified into four time periods: 2007-2009; 2010-2013; 2014-2017; 2018-2020 and analyzed cross-sectionally in each period. Demographic and clinical variables, as well as the type of biologic used, were assessed. Generalized linear models were applied to study the evolution of the variables of interest over time periods, the diagnosis, and the interactions between them. A total of 4543 patients initiated a first biologic during the entire time frame of the study. Over the four time periods, disease evolution at the time of biologic initiation (p < 0.001), disease activity (p < 0.001), retention rate (p < 0.001) and the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors as a first-line treatment (p < 0.001) showed a significant tendency to decrease. Conversely, comorbidities, as assessed by the Charlson index (p < 0.001), and the percentage of patients using bDMARDs in monotherapy (p < 0.001), and corticosteroids (p < 0.001) tended to increase over time. Over the entire period of the study's analysis, 3289 patients started a second biologic. The following trends were observed: decreased DAS28 at switching (p < 0.001), lower retention rates (p = 0.004), and incremental changes to the therapeutic target between the first and second biologic (p < 0.001). From 2007 until now rheumatic patients who started a biologic were older, exhibited less clinical activity, presented more comorbidities, and switched to a different biologic more frequently and earlier.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34302036     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94504-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  38 in total

1.  Change Over Time in the Pattern of Clinical Response to First-line Biologic Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Observational Data in a Real-life Setting.

Authors:  Ennio Giulio Favalli; Andrea Becciolini; Pier Luigi Meroni
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 2.  Biologic therapies in rheumatology: lessons learned, future directions.

Authors:  Vibeke Strand; Robert Kimberly; John D Isaacs
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexandre Sepriano; Andreas Kerschbaumer; Josef S Smolen; Désirée van der Heijde; Maxime Dougados; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Iain B McInnes; Johannes W Bijlsma; Gerd R Burmester; Maarten de Wit; Louise Falzon; Robert Landewé
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Ten years with biologics: to whom do data on effectiveness and safety apply?

Authors:  Julia F Simard; Elizabeth V Arkema; Anders Sundström; Pierre Geborek; Tore Saxne; Eva Baecklund; Lars Coster; Christina Dackhammar; Lennart Jacobsson; Nils Feltelius; Staffan Lindblad; Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Lars Klareskog; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Martin Neovius; Johan Askling
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Cost-effectiveness of TNF inhibitors vs synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Markov model study based on two longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  Maria K Kvamme; Elisabeth Lie; Till Uhlig; Tron A Moger; Tore K Kvien; Ivar S Kristiansen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Changes in disease characteristics and response rates among patients in the United Kingdom starting anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for rheumatoid arthritis between 2001 and 2008.

Authors:  Kimme L Hyrich; Kath D Watson; Mark Lunt; Deborah P M Symmons
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 7.  Advances in rheumatology: new targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Paul P Tak; Joachim R Kalden
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 8.  The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology.

Authors:  Thomas Dörner; Vibeke Strand; Paul Cornes; João Gonçalves; László Gulácsi; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Josef Smolen; Yoshiya Tanaka; Gerd R Burmester
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Assessing the Value of Biosimilars: A Review of the Role of Budget Impact Analysis.

Authors:  Steven Simoens; Ira Jacobs; Robert Popovian; Leah Isakov; Lesley G Shane
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Epidemiological studies in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and comorbidity of the rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Sherine E Gabriel; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Global epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Axel Finckh; Benoît Gilbert; Bridget Hodkinson; Sang-Cheol Bae; Ranjeny Thomas; Kevin D Deane; Deshiré Alpizar-Rodriguez; Kim Lauper
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 32.286

Review 2.  Subcutaneously-Administered Infliximab in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Short Narrative Review of Current Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Florenzo Iannone; Fabrizio Conti; Alberto Cauli; Alberto Farina; Roberto Caporali
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 3.  Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview.

Authors:  Andrei-Flavius Radu; Simona Gabriela Bungau
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.