Literature DB >> 34301973

Plasmonic mode coupling and thin film sensing in metal-insulator-metal structures.

N Andam1,2, S Refki2, S Hayashi2,3, Z Sekkat4,5,6.   

Abstract

Optical sensors based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) in the attenuated total reflection (ATR) configuration in layered media have attracted considerable attention over the past decades owing to their ability of label free sensing in biomolecular interaction analysis, and highly sensitive detection of changes in refractive index and thickness, i.e. the optical thickness, of thin film adsorbates (thin film sensing). Furthermore, SPR is highly sensitive to the refractive index of the medium adjacent to the bare metal, and it allows for bulk sensing as well. When deposited at the metal/air interface, an adsorbed layer disturbs the highly localized, i.e. bound, wave at this interface and changes the plasmon resonance to allow for sensing in angular or wavelength interrogation and intensity measurement modes. A high degree of sensitivity is required for precise and efficient sensing, especially for biomolecular interaction analysis for early stage diagnostics; and besides conventional SPR (CSPR), several other configurations have been developed in recent years targeting sensitivity, including long-range SPR (LRSPR) and waveguide-coupled SPR (WGSPR) observed in MIM structures, referred here to by MIM modes, resulting from the coupling of SPRs at I/M interfaces, and Fano-type resonances occurring from broad and sharp modes coupling in layered structures. In our previous research, we demonstrated that MIM is better than CSPR for bulk sensing, and in this paper, we show that CSPR is better than MIM for thin film sensing for thicknesses of the sensing layer (SL) larger than 10 nm. We discuss and compare the sensitivity of CSPR and MIM for thin film sensing by using both experiments and theoretical calculations based on rigorous electromagnetic (EM) theory. We discuss in detail MIM modes coupling and anti-crossing, and we show that when a thin film adsorbate, i.e. a SL), is deposited on top of the outermost-layer of an optimized MIM structure, it modifies the characteristics of the coupled modes of the structure, and it reduces the electric field, both inside the SL and at the SL/air interface, and as a result, it decreases the sensitivity of the MIM versus the CSPR sensor. Our work is of critical importance to plasmonic mode coupling using MIM configurations, as well as to optical bio- and chemical-sensing.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34301973     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94143-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  20 in total

Review 1.  Plasmon-enhanced optical sensors: a review.

Authors:  Ming Li; Scott K Cushing; Nianqiang Wu
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 2.  Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing.

Authors:  Katherine A Willets; Richard P Van Duyne
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.703

Review 3.  Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species.

Authors:  Jirí Homola
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  High-throughput SPR sensor for food safety.

Authors:  Marek Piliarik; Lucie Párová; Jirí Homola
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Long-range surface plasmons supported by a bilayer metallic structure for sensing applications.

Authors:  M Zekriti; Dmitry V Nesterenko; Z Sekkat
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 6.  Nanoplasmonic sensors for biointerfacial science.

Authors:  Joshua A Jackman; Abdul Rahim Ferhan; Nam-Joon Cho
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 7.  New trends in instrumental design for surface plasmon resonance-based biosensors.

Authors:  Abdennour Abbas; Matthew J Linman; Quan Cheng
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 10.618

8.  Resolution enhancement in surface plasmon resonance sensor based on waveguide coupled mode by combining a bimetallic approach.

Authors:  Kyeong-Seok Lee; Ju Myeong Son; Dae-Yong Jeong; Taek Sung Lee; Won Mok Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Small molecule immunosensing using surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  John Mitchell
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Sensitivity Enhancement of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides/Silicon Nanostructure-based Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor.

Authors:  Qingling Ouyang; Shuwen Zeng; Li Jiang; Liying Hong; Gaixia Xu; Xuan-Quyen Dinh; Jun Qian; Sailing He; Junle Qu; Philippe Coquet; Ken-Tye Yong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Design Strategy for Nanostructured Arrays of Metallodielectric Cuboids to Systematically Tune the Optical Response and Eliminate Spurious Bulk Effects in Plasmonic Biosensors.

Authors:  Anna Luise Grab; Andreas Bacher; Alexander Nesterov-Mueller; Reiner Dahint
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04

2.  Nanoantennas Inversely Designed to Couple Free Space and a Metal-Insulator-Metal Waveguide.

Authors:  Yeming Han; Yu Lin; Wei Ma; Jan G Korvink; Huigao Duan; Yongbo Deng
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.076

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.