Literature DB >> 34301934

Lineage-defined leiomyosarcoma subtypes emerge years before diagnosis and determine patient survival.

Yael Babichev1, Fabio Fuligni2, Nathaniel D Anderson3,4, Federico Comitani3, Mehdi Layeghifard3, Rosemarie E Venier1, Stefan C Dentro5, Anant Maheshwari3, Sheena Guram1, Claire Wunker1,6, J Drew Thompson3, Kyoko E Yuki3, Huayun Hou3, Matthew Zatzman3,4, Nicholas Light3,6, Marcus Q Bernardini7,8, Jay S Wunder1,9,10, Irene L Andrulis4,1,11, Peter Ferguson7,9,10, Albiruni R Abdul Razak7, Carol J Swallow1,6,9,12, James J Dowling3,11, Rima S Al-Awar13,14, Richard Marcellus13, Marjan Rouzbahman4,7, Moritz Gerstung5, Daniel Durocher1,11, Ludmil B Alexandrov15, Brendan C Dickson4,1,16, Rebecca A Gladdy17,18,19,20, Adam Shlien21,22,23.   

Abstract

Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are genetically heterogeneous tumors differentiating along smooth muscle lines. Currently, LMS treatment is not informed by molecular subtyping and is associated with highly variable survival. While disease site continues to dictate clinical management, the contribution of genetic factors to LMS subtype, origins, and timing are unknown. Here we analyze 70 genomes and 130 transcriptomes of LMS, including multiple tumor regions and paired metastases. Molecular profiling highlight the very early origins of LMS. We uncover three specific subtypes of LMS that likely develop from distinct lineages of smooth muscle cells. Of these, dedifferentiated LMS with high immune infiltration and tumors primarily of gynecological origin harbor genomic dystrophin deletions and/or loss of dystrophin expression, acquire the highest burden of genomic mutation, and are associated with worse survival. Homologous recombination defects lead to genome-wide mutational signatures, and a corresponding sensitivity to PARP trappers and other DNA damage response inhibitors, suggesting a promising therapeutic strategy for LMS. Finally, by phylogenetic reconstruction, we present evidence that clones seeding lethal metastases arise decades prior to LMS diagnosis.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34301934     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24677-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  5 in total

1.  Silencing of CD24 Enhances the PRIMA-1-Induced Restoration of Mutant p53 in Prostate Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Bin Yi; Chao Wang; Dongquan Chen; Sejong Bae; Shi Wei; Rong-Jun Guo; Changming Lu; Lisa L H Nguyen; Wei-Hsiung Yang; James W Lillard; Xingyi Zhang; Lizhong Wang; Runhua Liu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Progressive loss of myogenic differentiation in leiomyosarcoma has prognostic value.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Demicco; Genevieve M Boland; Kari J Brewer Savannah; Kristelle Lusby; Eric D Young; Davis Ingram; Kelsey L Watson; Marshall Bailey; Xiangqian Guo; Jason L Hornick; Matt van de Rijn; Wei-Lien Wang; Keila E Torres; Dina Lev; Alexander J Lazar
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Organoid Modeling of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment.

Authors:  James T Neal; Xingnan Li; Junjie Zhu; Valeria Giangarra; Caitlin L Grzeskowiak; Jihang Ju; Iris H Liu; Shin-Heng Chiou; Ameen A Salahudeen; Amber R Smith; Brian C Deutsch; Lillian Liao; Allison J Zemek; Fan Zhao; Kasper Karlsson; Liora M Schultz; Thomas J Metzner; Lincoln D Nadauld; Yuen-Yi Tseng; Sahar Alkhairy; Coyin Oh; Paula Keskula; Daniel Mendoza-Villanueva; Francisco M De La Vega; Pamela L Kunz; Joseph C Liao; John T Leppert; John B Sunwoo; Chiara Sabatti; Jesse S Boehm; William C Hahn; Grace X Y Zheng; Mark M Davis; Calvin J Kuo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 66.850

4.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers.

Authors:  Serena Nik-Zainal; Ludmil B Alexandrov; David C Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Christopher D Greenman; Keiran Raine; David Jones; Jonathan Hinton; John Marshall; Lucy A Stebbings; Andrew Menzies; Sancha Martin; Kenric Leung; Lina Chen; Catherine Leroy; Manasa Ramakrishna; Richard Rance; King Wai Lau; Laura J Mudie; Ignacio Varela; David J McBride; Graham R Bignell; Susanna L Cooke; Adam Shlien; John Gamble; Ian Whitmore; Mark Maddison; Patrick S Tarpey; Helen R Davies; Elli Papaemmanuil; Philip J Stephens; Stuart McLaren; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; Göran Jönsson; Judy E Garber; Daniel Silver; Penelope Miron; Aquila Fatima; Sandrine Boyault; Anita Langerød; Andrew Tutt; John W M Martens; Samuel A J R Aparicio; Åke Borg; Anne Vincent Salomon; Gilles Thomas; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Andrea L Richardson; Michael S Neuberger; P Andrew Futreal; Peter J Campbell; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 41.582

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Retrospective immunohistochemical investigation of suspected non-visceral leiomyosarcoma in dogs.

Authors:  Rachel V Brady; Robert B Rebhun; Katherine A Skorupski; Jenna H Burton; Sami Al-Nadaf; Eunju Choi; Jennifer L Willcox
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 1.569

Review 2.  Application of Multi-Omics Approach in Sarcomas: A Tool for Studying Mechanism, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Zijian Zou; Wei Sun; Yu Xu; Wanlin Liu; Jingqin Zhong; Xinyi Lin; Yong Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  On the Relevance of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Metabolic Landscape Mapping.

Authors:  Miguel Esperança-Martins; Iola F Duarte; Mara Rodrigues; Joaquim Soares do Brito; Dolores López-Presa; Luís Costa; Isabel Fernandes; Sérgio Dias
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.