Literature DB >> 34301752

Ceralasertib (AZD6738), an Oral ATR Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination with Carboplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Study.

Timothy A Yap1, Matthew G Krebs2, Sophie Postel-Vinay3, Anthony El-Khouiery4, Jean-Charles Soria3, Juanita Lopez1, Alienor Berges5, S Y Amy Cheung5, Itziar Irurzun-Arana5, Andrew Goldwin6, Brunella Felicetti6, Gemma N Jones7, Alan Lau8, Paul Frewer9, Andrew J Pierce7, Glen Clack6, Christine Stephens6, Simon A Smith6, Emma Dean6, Simon J Hollingsworth10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study reports the safety, tolerability, MTD, recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, and preliminary antitumor activity of ceralasertib combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. It also examined exploratory predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 36) received a fixed dose of carboplatin (AUC5) with escalating doses of ceralasertib (20 mg twice daily to 60 mg once daily) in 21-day cycles. Sequential and concurrent combination dosing schedules were assessed.
RESULTS: Two ceralasertib MTD dose schedules, 20 mg twice daily on days 4-13 and 40 mg once daily on days 1-2, were tolerated with carboplatin AUC5; the latter was declared the RP2D. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3) were anemia (39%), thrombocytopenia (36%), and neutropenia (25%). Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 2; including one grade 4 platelet count decreased) and a combination of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3 patients. Ceralasertib was quickly absorbed (tmax ∼1 hour), with a terminal plasma half-life of 8-11 hours. Upregulation of pRAD50, indicative of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) activation, was observed in tumor biopsies during ceralasertib treatment. Two patients with absent or low ATM or SLFN11 protein expression achieved confirmed RECIST v1.1 partial responses. Eighteen of 34 (53%) response-evaluable patients had RECIST v1.1 stable disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D for ceralasertib plus carboplatin was established as ceralasertib 40 mg once daily on days 1-2 administered with carboplatin AUC5 every 3 weeks, with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies confirming pharmacodynamic modulation and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity observed. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34301752     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  12 in total

Review 1.  Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alexandre André B A da Costa; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Alan D D'Andrea; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 112.288

2.  TOP1-DNA Trapping by Exatecan and Combination Therapy with ATR Inhibitor.

Authors:  Ukhyun Jo; Yasuhisa Murai; Keli K Agama; Yilun Sun; Liton Kumar Saha; Xi Yang; Yasuhiro Arakawa; Sophia Gayle; Kelli Jones; Vishwas Paralkar; Ranjini K Sundaram; Jinny Van Doorn; Juan C Vasquez; Ranjit S Bindra; Woo Suk Choi; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.009

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Synergistic Antitumor Effects Exploited from the Inhibition of Ataxia Telangiectasia and RAD3-Related Protein Kinase (ATR).

Authors:  Li-Wei Wang; Songwei Jiang; Ying-Hui Yuan; Jilong Duan; Nian-Dong Mao; Zi Hui; Renren Bai; Tian Xie; Xiang-Yang Ye
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  In Vivo Targeting Replication Protein A for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Pamela S VanderVere-Carozza; Navnath S Gavande; Shadia I Jalal; Karen E Pollok; Elmira Ekinci; Joshua Heyza; Steve M Patrick; Andi Masters; John J Turchi; Katherine S Pawelczak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Everything Comes with a Price: The Toxicity Profile of DNA-Damage Response Targeting Agents.

Authors:  Federica Martorana; Leandro Apolinario Da Silva; Cristiana Sessa; Ilaria Colombo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Therapeutic Targeting of DNA Damage Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  DNA repair defects in cancer and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Jessica L Hopkins; Li Lan; Lee Zou
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.890

Review 8.  Perspective on the Use of DNA Repair Inhibitors as a Tool for Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Liesbeth Everix; Shankari Nair; Cathryn H S Driver; Ingeborg Goethals; Mike M Sathekge; Thomas Ebenhan; Charlot Vandevoorde; Julie Bolcaen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Targeting the p53 Pathway in CLL: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Marwan Kwok; Angelo Agathanggelou; Nicholas Davies; Tatjana Stankovic
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Targeting the DNA Damage Response Pathway as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Fabio Catalano; Roberto Borea; Silvia Puglisi; Andrea Boutros; Annalice Gandini; Malvina Cremante; Valentino Martelli; Stefania Sciallero; Alberto Puccini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.