| Literature DB >> 34301660 |
Maria Mathews1, Sarah Spencer2, Lindsay Hedden2,3, Emily Gard Marshall4, Julia Lukewich5, Leslie Meredith6, Dana Ryan5, Richard Buote7, Tiffany Liu8, Emily Volpe8, Paul S Gill9,10, Bridget Ryan6,8, Gordon Schacter6, Jamie Wickett6, Thomas R Freeman6, Shannon L Sibbald6,11, Eric Wong6,12, Maddi McKay4,13, Rita McCracken14,15, Judith Belle Brown6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Given the recurrent risk of respiratory illness-based pandemics, and the important roles family physicians play during public health emergencies, the development of pandemic plans for primary care is imperative. Existing pandemic plans in Canada, however, do not adequately incorporate family physicians' roles and perspectives. This policy and planning oversight has become increasingly evident with the emergence of the novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, pandemic. This study is designed to inform the development of pandemic plans for primary care through evidence from four provinces in Canada: British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and Ontario. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will employ a multiple-case study of regions in four provinces. Each case consists of a mixed methods design which comprises: (1) a chronology of family physician roles in the COVID-19 pandemic response; (2) a provincial policy analysis; and (3) qualitative interviews with family physicians. Relevant policy and guidance documents will be identified through targeted, snowball and general search strategies. Additionally, these policy documents will be analysed to identify gaps and/or emphases in existing policies and policy responses. Interviews will explore family physicians' proposed, actual and potential roles during the pandemic, the facilitators and barriers they have encountered throughout and the influence of gender on their professional roles. Data will be thematically analysed using a content analysis framework, first at the regional level and then through cross-case analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for this study has been granted by the Research Ethics of British Columbia, the Health Research Ethics Board of Newfoundland and Labrador, the Nova Scotia Health Authority Research Ethics Board and the Western University Research Ethics Board. Findings will be disseminated via conferences and peer-reviewed publications. Evidence and lessons learnt will be used to develop tools for government ministries, public health units and family physicians for improved pandemic response plans for primary care. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; primary care; qualitative research
Year: 2021 PMID: 34301660 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692