Literature DB >> 34301594

The developmental biology of Charnia and the eumetazoan affinity of the Ediacaran rangeomorphs.

Frances S Dunn1,2,3, Alexander G Liu4, Dmitriy V Grazhdankin5,6, Philip Vixseboxse3, Joseph Flannery-Sutherland3, Emily Green3, Simon Harris2, Philip R Wilby2,7, Philip C J Donoghue3.   

Abstract

Molecular timescales estimate that early animal lineages diverged tens of millions of years before their earliest unequivocal fossil evidence. The Ediacaran macrobiota (~574 to 538 million years ago) are largely eschewed from this debate, primarily due to their extreme phylogenetic uncertainty, but remain germane. We characterize the development of Charnia masoni and establish the affinity of rangeomorphs, among the oldest and most enigmatic components of the Ediacaran macrobiota. We provide the first direct evidence for the internal interconnected nature of rangeomorphs and show that Charnia was constructed of repeated branches that derived successively from pre-existing branches. We find homology and rationalize morphogenesis between disparate rangeomorph taxa, before producing a phylogenetic analysis, resolving Charnia as a stem-eumetazoan and expanding the anatomical disparity of that group to include a long-extinct bodyplan. These data bring competing records of early animal evolution into closer agreement, reformulating our understanding of the evolutionary emergence of animal bodyplans.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34301594     DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Adv        ISSN: 2375-2548            Impact factor:   14.136


  2 in total

1.  Metacommunity analyses show an increase in ecological specialisation throughout the Ediacaran period.

Authors:  Rebecca Eden; Andrea Manica; Emily G Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 9.593

Review 2.  Were the First Trace Fossils Really Burrows or Could They Have Been Made by Sediment-Displacive Chemosymbiotic Organisms?

Authors:  Duncan McIlroy
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.