Literature DB >> 34298356

Can the booster interval for the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine 'FSME-IMMUN' be prolonged? - A systematic review.

R Steffen1, W Erber2, H J Schmitt3.   

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccines are effective and well tolerated. However, their acceptance and use by the public in endemic areas are suboptimal. To some extent this is due to the complicated dosing schedule requiring frequent boosters at variable intervals that even change with age. Simplification of the dosing schedule has failed so far as it is debated if the persistence of TBE virus (TBEV) antibodies is the only relevant factor for protection or if immune memory plays a decisive role as well. The objective here is to present the available evidence to determine the need for boosters and their interval after a primary series of three doses of FSME-IMMUN. A systematic literature review was conducted with a focus on serology, particularly seropersistence, immune memory, effectiveness, and vaccine breakthroughs (VB) of FSME-IMMUN. While after a 3-dose primary series seropositivity persisted for more than 10 years in >90% of younger subjects, it dropped to 37.5% in those 60 years or older. In contrast, field effectiveness of FSME-IMMUN remains high in irregularly vaccinated subjects and thus does not correlate well with the percentage of subjects achieving an arbitrarily defined threshold of persisting antibodies. FSME-IMMUN booster doses led to increases in antibody responses within 7 days. VB are rare and remain poorly understood. VB did not increase, and vaccine effectiveness did not significantly decrease with time since completion of the primary vaccination series or with the time since administration of the last vaccine dose. For all these reasons, data identified from this systematic review suggest that seropersistence alone does not explain the high effectiveness of FSME-IMMUN irrespective of the time since the last vaccine dose was administered. Induction of immunological memory characterized by a rapid and sustained secondary immune response is proving to be an alternative mechanism of action for protection against TBE. In this context Switzerland and Finland have adopted a longer booster interval (i.e., 10 years) following the three-dose primary immunization schedule without any evidence of harm at a population level. Longer booster intervals will likely drive up vaccine uptake. There is a lack of data to base an interval recommendation beyond 10 years.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Booster; Effectiveness; Failure; Memory; Serology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34298356     DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis        ISSN: 1877-959X            Impact factor:   3.817


  3 in total

1.  Tick-borne encephalitis vaccine effectiveness and barriers to vaccination in Germany.

Authors:  Teresa M Nygren; Antonia Pilic; Merle M Böhmer; Christiane Wagner-Wiening; Ole Wichmann; Thomas Harder; Wiebke Hellenbrand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Retrospective, matched case-control analysis of tickborne encephalitis vaccine effectiveness by booster interval, Switzerland 2006-2020.

Authors:  Kyra D Zens; Sarah R Haile; Axel J Schmidt; Ekkehardt S Altpeter; Jan S Fehr; Phung Lang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Recommendations to Improve Tick-Borne Encephalitis Surveillance and Vaccine Uptake in Europe.

Authors:  Michael Kunze; Pavle Banović; Petra Bogovič; Violeta Briciu; Rok Čivljak; Gerhard Dobler; Adriana Hristea; Jana Kerlik; Suvi Kuivanen; Jan Kynčl; Anne-Mette Lebech; Lars Lindquist; Iwona Paradowska-Stankiewicz; Srđan Roglić; Dita Smíšková; Franc Strle; Olli Vapalahti; Nenad Vranješ; Nataliya Vynograd; Joanna Maria Zajkowska; Andreas Pilz; Andreas Palmborg; Wilhelm Erber
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.